Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 7:01 pm

Space ally? How much for your Secretary of State?

On this anniversary of Apollo 13 of 1970 redramatization with Hanks and Sinise:  Let me not be alone in reiterating that America has know at least since 1970 how to filter out dangerous green house carbon gases from our environment.  (See movie)

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton was a choice pick for her proud and known "skills" and yet not yet considered as of such same "skills" should disqualify her from "Honorable" benching. 

See: she and "Bill" had their reputations and even ran on vindicating "Bill" and his disbarments with a new national stage venture? 

See: "Hillary" was a natural for a wise political removal of her from national stage and spotlight of our Senate and for her proud and known skills to do the "lying" like in THE HUNT FOR RED OCTOBER:  "What?  You have lost another nuclear submarine."

So what about the economy now so near April 15th so close to Apollo 13 oxygen tank explosion in 1970?

Was the recession "unnecessary" but for "Healthcare Hillary" of "Clinton Machine" entering the 2008 race for our Constitution defending "office of the president"? 

Did the economy freeze on fears of "President Hillary"?  Was it just her associations with "global warming alarmism" and the global scaring of worlds children with end of world doomism and "murdered" tossing to anyone buying another gallon of gasoline "knowing" they were killing polar bears with such?

Really quit absurd.  You asked: "How much for your Secretary of State" space ally.   Not much, how about a dollar?

To look again at our latest "low" as "unnecessary" and a fabrication of Democrats White House seeking with a new extra-Constitutional AMBASSADOR TO THE WORLD post just for "Bill":  Al Gore and his global warming alarmism and global snobbery ignored what we knew back since at least April 1970 of Apollo 13 mission, that we knew as a nation how to capture and filter out dangerous greenhouse gases from our environments.

See:  We didn’t need to do the "kill off" of old American ways to spearhead a new Gorist Creed, and all the automotive and corporate air flight jobs and companies.  We didn’t have to go the path of Spain that showed us to seek such a radical new creed so was likely to cost at least two jobs for each new "green" job created.  

Didn’t you know American or Canadians had already done work on inexpensive filter and capture devises that could be put on roof tops in "exhaust" regions and create a new industry and jobs without having destroyed old American ways? 

Really, space ally, just a dollar will do.

What is "honorable"?  How is "Honorable" even a consideration for a known and admitted past just "fork tongued" double speaking orator named Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton ("Hillary")?  Do you remember that Gore’s concerts went to the trash yards and collected old tires to bring to his concerts to "not waste energy" and for concerts that could have been more "daytime" and not "needing" large venue night lighting?

It still makes little sense that Bush administration caused this "new low". 

The Republicans had a lack of motivation to create again an economics for advantaging by Democrats, again, of "it is the economy, stupid." 

It was Democrats that were yelling about Bush spending too much and being prohibitive on spending that countered the rash bleeding of a trillion too much in Clintons leeching federal budget by two trillion, too quickly. 

Bush could only have tried to fix economy the way he did with Obama’s transition team by specifically showing that the Clintons had irresponsibly taken near a trillion too much out of spending for their and some other’s "instant popularity." 

Democrats couldn’t win 2008 if they let Bush do the spending now known better to have been needed to fix Clintons’ reign.

So:  The recession was an "UNNECESSARY ECONOMIC LOW" or was it inevitable for their was no way to stop Clintons from trying to bend Constitutional intent and wisdom by pushing hard for a return to our "BULLY PULPIT" of our White House?

So oil spiked after Senator Clinton threatened to sieze oil company profits and not necessarily just American company profits? 

Or, was it a spike that happened only after Al Gore alarmism introduced unprecedented "subjectivism" into our economics by scaring consumers that they were immoral and killing polar bears with every gallon of gas consumed?

Maybe both?  Maybe both and all the while we had the technology and were rebuilding our automotive and energy science and practice with day nearing of everyday home roofing shingles able to look near the same and yet be a integrated circuitry of solar energy capture and usage? 

Our/your next generations were already "all over it" yet likely with Bush/Cheney to get credit for being "on top of it" and "green" but not yet or still "anti-capitalist"?

So the housing bubble became dangerous because it was a Clinton "unfunded federal social program" as concieved and inaugurated that to work within existing economic science would need at least one of the two trillion they cut rashly from Federal Budget not removed from such.

Our recession became necessary first because people were losing their jobs not because the banks had played the accounting games to try the "can you just gamble away the risks" that President Clinton is remembered for suggesting. 

Banks would have been much better off and maybe "fine" if Bush had been allowed to attack the Clintons’ SURPLUS as "rash" and "irresponsible" administering.

No "honor" left?

We didn’t need to effect change the way the Democrats sought and did even if global warming were "real science" and a "real concern" as we had ability to create at least two new industries with additional jobs as new jobs with old jobs still intact. 

Remember the "filter" the astronauts had to fabricate in APOLLO 13 movie?  Well,  land based filter and capture devises have been invented and tested, and of near "off the Home Depot shelves" materials probably near of 80 pvc large diameter piping.

Well, tax day is near and maybe with new "lows" the norm.  Is this the first time you have considered the recession was "necessary" only towards Democrat aims in 2008 and beyond? 

Space ally?  Space ally?  But she does "what? you lost another nuclear submarine?" so well? 

Note:  above was written around the assumption that new lows in nuclear parity by such signatories today has not been done without considering our needs to defend with nuclear weapons from approaching asteroids and aliens.

Comments »

No comments yet.

Leave a comment

Publication may require admin approval; please come back later to view your comment.