Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 7:56 pm

When it isn’t because they were too "Chicago":

President Obama just announced an extention of Bush tax cuts on condition that unemployment benefits be also extended.

President Obama didn’t have much choice.

Without putting a firing of Hillary Clinton on the table he limited his own options on tax cuts for the top two percent.

Without offering up a balancing with a firing of Hillary Clinton he still sat at tax table as "polarizing" and of a new low in "blame game" politics.

Without presenting a firing of Hillary Clinton as an option in tax cuts for top two percent of Americans President Obama was still of a specific labeling and tagging of such as evil capitalists of all the blame.

Maybe the economy didn’t start shrinking and collapsing as soon as Hillary in "for President" jack booting was of proclaiming an attempt to seize profits of evil capitalists as of her "platform."

Maybe the prospect of President Hillary didn’t really while seeming the "inevitable" future so directly cause the economic shrinkage that then led to the housing crisis from a shrinking economy so shrinking household incomes.

Maybe it was just all the Democrats in unison and jack booting to a polarized politic against a evil axis of capitalists.

So we are here now, and the banking and housing crisis was not where it started but where it manifested the most after the fact.

Would an offering up of a firing of Hillary Clinton been enough to placate the top two percent of American tax payers with an offering to them only half responsible and half as guilty with such an offering orated specific to a more reasonable blaming of half of all these problems on both the Clintons?

Sure all Democrats set out to demonize capitalism and the top tax payers but really it was "Hillary for President" proclamations to a "seizing" of oil company profits well beyond here to fore standard taxation methods of government taking that alone might not have been near half as bad but for the Al Gore Global Warming ALARMISM that can be analysed to an effecting to the spike in gas prices with injection of a new subjective in gas demand and supply pricing normality.

Yes our down economy may have started with "Hillary’s" declaration of an intent to seize profits of oil company capitalist profits but such a crashing of economy to causing the housing crisis probably needed the Al Gore Global Warming ALARMISM in conjunction/unison.

Was President Obama’s only chance to get a concession on tax rates for top two percent from a peace offering of a reduction in "blame game" politics and a reduction to half a blaming with an offering up of Clintons as at least half as responsible as evil axis of capitalists?

And, while worrying about Clinton’s reputation as "polarizing" are we at least now with President Obama have a second string Diplomat so that a failing on Koreas by Clinton a call for a back up Diplomat and not an immediate call to war?

So without extending tax cuts even for the top two percent the general rule around tax increases unwise during a recession necessarily had to hold, but only maybe in these economics for Dems of a demonizing of the "haves" as an axis of evil capitalists.

Not extending the tax cuts would only have been a further counter-productive jobs policy as yet of another blaming of a part of our economics more historically involved in job creation, especially in times of economics and politics when they were being told they were bad to create jobs and needed to be told to create jobs, because they were evil and of an evil axis of capitalists.

So as long as it is "all the Bush’s fault"…

Oh, and well as long as Dems were of thinking the order to fix "problems" wasn’t to immigration then jobs/economy and then healthcare and so to their much more expensive and counter-productive with carrots of healthcare and jobs before immigration…

Comments »

No comments yet.

Leave a comment

Publication may require admin approval; please come back later to view your comment.