Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 10:05 am

To skin a chicken you first must catch it.

To save healthcare in America you should have first looked at what wasn’t really being looked at, our communities as communities?

To get to Carnegie Hall "PRACTICE, PRACTICE, PRACTICE" like?

Ok, it is odd that Presidents Clintons (Clinton two-fer in the original) in their first moves past boot from White House was to attempting to get Bill nearest the Penthouse suite in new Carnegie Hall Towers in New York City and so as an attempt to get tax payers to cover near a million per year rent - before build-out just for President Bill Clinton.

Ok, it wasn’t to such a "simple life" that Clintons were to trying to get tax payers to cover for them an annual rent for President Clinton that was in just first year to amount to more than had been paid for all past Presidents of the United States combined in our brief history.

Ok, it was to they didn’t get their first choice and its desired elite austerity and royal spledor and that even what he got dragged into near tears uptown in Harlem was even then more than tax dollars should have been released for.

What was "appropriate" for a new Senator? 

What was "appropriate" as well for a new Senator and especially a carpetbagging Senator around healthcare reform?

What would have been better for all New Yorkers but for Senator Clinton and such just President Clinton to have turned their energies to helping all New Yorkers get "coverage" at least as Massachusetts had worked for all?

How was it Senator Clinton isn’t googleable for years of hard work to get all New Yorkers covered by all New Yorkers and is almost entirely searchable for "universal" coverage just for elite Americans as her reaching for centralized big government solution inseparable from tag as "socialism"?

Where was the "community service" in Washington DC Democrats manuevering? 

Where was the sensibility to look at greatest costs that may have been the easiest to fix and fix locally?

Where was the focus on local and community level change where about healthcare by a neighbor for a neighbor in a neighborhood or near neighborhood healthcare facility run by mostly other neighbors for other neighbors mostly was still a healthcare system about neighbors and community? 

How did we get to neighbors needing WASHINGTON to give care to a neighbor? 

How did we get to neighbors and communities thinking around health fears that it wasn’t just still a neighbor or other member of their community that they really were only needing to consider?

How did we get to a healthcare cost system inflated and confused just because WASHINGTON seemed to want to be in our "community" decisions?

Isn’t the greatest "cost" issue thought easiest to fix that of how emergency rooms and their higher costs from higher over-head are providing healthcare services like at five dollars per case when only one dollar per case needed otherwise?

Isn’t it only because WASHINGTON wants in that communities have been not fixing such system on their own and maybe with a new focus at county wide not country wide levels?

Isn’t it only because we stopped looking at such practice around urbanity and counties and inequalities of burdens for a regional model of life and created a new healthcare model to first match the existing regional model of life?

Even as early as early 90s the United States was with a new technological level of interconnectivity such to adjust healthcare systems and "groups" towards "county based" and more in lieu of "employer based" coverage.

Even as early as early 90s were we with though a new interconnectivity that could prevent much of the feared abuses thought to come then with attempts to fix healthcare with one small step at a time community and county based reforms.

Even as early as early 90s and before Clintons got elected a great extra cost in healthcare was that emergency rooms providing at five time or more the costs to their community care for others in their community that could be covered at on unit instead of a multiple of such to five.

To fix healthcare don’t we first have to stop looking at it the way and ways the Clintons both have long encouraged?

To skin a chicken you must catch it first, and isn’t it actually worse than all the above as per our current economics that President Clinton did seem to approach his "banking pals" thinking they would dish out his "rent" for near penthouse suite in new Carnegie Hall Towers and for them like "owing" him for not just helping them create an entire new market in "derivitive" but actually for encouraging them into such when he wanted to try running unfunded and underfunded classic federal social programs?

{I would mention such more about President Obama, but see in early 90s, he and his being four years older than me to the day, still had him as a fresh law school grad, and seeming focused other ways.}

Comments »

No comments yet.

Leave a comment

Publication may require admin approval; please come back later to view your comment.