Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 5:58 pm

A polar bear enters stage left:  A polar bear enters chin down looking dehydrated and sad:

>Seems no more than rubber bullets and/or isolation at play.

>Seems odd, just odd this polar bear entering from stage left.

(Polar bear doesn’t speak)

(No real guns seem responsible for all the hype – wondering about the possible dehydration.)

The stage?  What, you want a stage?  Who do you think you are - Al Gore?

Polar bear keeps walking, you can see Russia in the back ground, visibility is good.

(Polar bear doesn’t realize it is 2010 and a mid-term election season.)

(Polar bear also doesn’t seem to understand combat - human style, naturally.)

Left is trying to cheer polar bear for entering stage left and are claiming him/her a "friend of Bill" - FOB.   Left is already understood for trying to move back to before Gore.

(Polar bear doesn’t realize "Hillary" trying to silence the guns hero style like GUNS OF NAVARONE dramatization of Battle of Leros, but only with hollywood hype, like.)

Left is now mired, mucky - mucky, torn between two competing histories, and especially that around the Clintons’ legacy around FOB (Friends of Bill).  Left needs a hero.

Polar bear still moving, sad, and looking dehydrated, no Democrats moving forward with "empowerment" or a bottle of water, or a song.   Dems starting to worry as polar bear keeps going right.

>Gladly no one even has rubber bullets loaded nor extra Kool Aid.  Polar bear not looking as sad anymore - still moving right.  Was it something President Obama said?  Was it due to a new centralized solution effected in Washington, by committee?  Did the polar bear just stop smelling Democrats?

So what if GUNS OF NAVARONE was fiction?  You get that Blumenthal was a big FOB, yes?  You get that "Hillary" is trying to play more hands from the FOB deck even though "personality based" centralization governance by President Obama is counter to the "empowerment" attitude of the nineties around Clintons?  Oh, you like the "hype" punditry offering comity to the LAST CHANCE FOR PEACE - Hillary entrance?

A polar bear enters stage from right, and Democrats start to smile again - seems they think polar bear can only be heading left.

(Polar bear doesn’t speak - well…?  Seems to communicate, some how - something.)

(Polar bears seem to start battling.  Dems don’t see it as love.)

>Seems interesting and that no rubber bullets seem needed, even.

>Seems hopeful as "battling" bears move left - hopeful for the Dems, bears seem indifferent.

Left seeing no blood, start cheering both bears, especially for seeming to head left and so most certainly big FOBs.   Al Gore, who?   What a fear monger.  All that talk of polar bears all soon to die that may have driven gas prices over four dollars a gallon as like a carbon guilt tax, with his subjective scare mongering - best to sneak back to "Bill" and his friends, even if "Hillary" now trying to play from such deck, and counter too to "empowerment" and "decentralization" that worked so well in the 90s.

Quiet, would you - this is my story, please just sit back down.  Yes the nineties was maybe more a success of Republicans than of FOB (Friends of Bill) science and analysis.  Yes the nineties that worked with a dot-com boom was obviously just "happenstance" and not "inspired or created, or saved" by Bill.  Yes, so much of the good news that came to our cities with the decentralization in "community policing" programs and the much championed by Republicans "welfare to workfare"  was arguably "happenstance" "Bill and Hillary" got too much credit for.  Please just take your seat, please.

Polar bears, still with Russia in the back ground look "together" and "happy under the sun" — Dems can smell them, and, so it is likely polar bears "up-wind" and not able to smell them.

>Seems no longer odd.

>Seems one bear was wanting after the other, and seem "safe." 

Polar bears start heading right.

Yes, Dems start to fret.

Yes, polar bears seem oblivious to the contradictions around LAST CHANCE FOR PEACE heroic "Hillary" effecting so also of the hypocracy steppin’ out around Democrats towards mid-terms.   Yes, very few seem to understand how they can be for "empowerment" and "empowerment zones" and the decentralization that was key to "community policing" and also be now for President Obama attempt to run a centralized "personality" based governance with redistribution key.

Well, yes "The Guns of Blumenthal" may need some explanation, past "FOB" ties and "rubber bullets" punditry.   See I first heard the "served in combat" Vietnam service lie back during the Clitnons’ years, when he front and center a "close friend" of "Bill" and "Hillary".  See, I realized such "lie" that someone pointed out to me meant an end to my efforts in Connecticut around helping write for more "clean"  positive change. 

Polar bear that entered from left no longer seems sad, probably wasn’t dehydrated.


  1. For the sake of “story” my comment around “clean” positive change is of my deciding to move from Connecticut and continue writing for such elsewhere, with a leaving CT to its own “new” in improvements aorund so much change I was some part of during nineties. I thought I was to move to LA but did that move to DC and staying on til ten years nearly passed. It was a Connecticut lawyer or sparkled at the “Blumenthal lie” that evening, so alerting me to what I guess was a breach of trust within the Connecticut bar.

    Comment by J Peter Hogan — 9/13/2010 @ 6:10 pm

  2. If you followed “community policing” and “liveable cities” intiatives you may know current Providence, RI Chief of Police (last I checked). What you may not have considered that he is in the above “web” for then being a neighbor, and not necessarily wise to diff between son and father around William Bratton, and my getting “wired” with our ambitions, of similar pace and range back in Boston in spring of 1988. Still wonder on stories that Chief Dean Esserman hasn’t been as successful as his mentors were. Still wonder for he left more a part of Connecticut web, with limits likes of Bratton never lived with my writing to assist positive change beyond limits of “Bill” (President Clinton’s personality). Chief Esserman may live more as a “control” sample effected specifically by Connecticut standards then. Hello old neighbor if you happen to read this.

    Comment by J Peter Hogan — 9/13/2010 @ 6:29 pm

Leave a comment

Publication may require admin approval; please come back later to view your comment.