Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 8:19 am

Is it today, still of Dems just playing the BIG TEASE?

Is it yesterday and yet tomorrow that hot seat of John McCain more the train and track fully laid and testable?


Have the Democrats gone soft, and taken economy with them?


Is it like HYPERION by Keats left to two and a half books?   Are the Dems just not going the distance?   Was Keats wise in HYPERION left without an expected additional half of a third book, for "hyper" in "K-E-A-T-S" beat could only be left maybe martyr chasing "hyper"?


So most of world and near all Democrats expected Al Gore to have become the elected President in 2000, and not as a former "cheerleader" like Bush but more a former war-time photo journalist.

Mush, mush, mush!  That is some bone these Dems have thrown the Republicans of 90s.

War beat?  Afghanistan as "Obama’s war of choice"?  Afghanistan as "President Al Gore’s" stolen moments/pix/photo-ops?

Where is the martyr, where is the martyr, where is the martyr "Hillary"?

Mush, mush, mush these the "Hillary Crusades"?  Halt!  Stop!  Click, click, click?

I am no student of poetry.   Thank you General Petraeus for setting me to Rudyard Kipling, and so for that library thing that had me loan out Shelley and Keats works at same time.   Keats’ HYPERION, again as me no student of poetry, does seem set as he said "Miltonian" but as well to beat of K-E-A-T-S and so fit to need a "hyper" echo.

I am no student of poetry.   Michael Moore it is amazing how another FARENHEIT 9/11 sort of writes itself, though disappointing in our not having caught "Hillary the Martyr".  Just seems more a Crusade turned "mush" with the expected "martyrdom" turned to "just accept "big tease" slop.  Afghanistan as Al Gore’s "necessary war" and wow! wow! wow! what amazing war photographs?  What a hero he would have been and with "Hillary" not the storied "martyr" but now with Bill of power beyond all imagination, extra-Constitutional and with President Al Gore happy with them.


What happened to First Lady Hillary Clinton’s crusades as an incendiary in Middle East and even the specifically more radicalized regions?  What happened to "Hillary’s" commitment to her cause to force Middle East and especially the Taliban to become more "American" and "American" as she said "American" should be?


Is it all now just "Hillary’s Big Tease" falling in ditch but for more dramatic "martyr" chase whipped "incendiary" by First Lady Hillary Clinton?


Slop this "Hillary" of chasing the "MARTYR" and pulling up "BIG TEASE"?

Slop?  Al Gore better writ to 9/11 plots and "Afghanistan as a necessary war"?  Even though 9/11 more an attack of disgruntled Muslims not content with post Saddam invasion of Kuwait rending of justice upon Saddam Hussein, then in Afghanistan mostly as foreigner on camping trips not of the 75% of Afghans rated as "illiterate" in their own tongue.

Slop that Al Gore was "expected" to become the President after Clintons, and while story of 9/11 attackers long laid with effectings upon United States soil proper set and fed and trained under Clintons?  

Mush that Clinton Administration, while wrapping to "transition" was as well of establishing new "walls of separation" at FBI between intelligence and enforcement branches that later were blamed for not "catching" 9/11 plotters before them chasing other "martyr"?  

Halting that Clintons if Al Gore had been elected would have had extra-Constitutional powers beyond their wildest imagination, and while Senator Hillary became the untouchable sentimental "Ground Zero Senator" as a new national heroine so moved suddenly past all "seniority" obstacles in Senate and normal road blocks in our system of "checks and balances" to such power usually reserved only for martyrs, post mortem?

Not as "incendiary" as Clinton the track a presidency of McCain would have whipped - new Federalist - to an economy not frozen with rash rush bitting at "green" and with more jobs likely saved and many more created in nurturing states’ teams in competition against each other not a bland "assimilation" to a new "big tease" centralism quite near socialism?

What a bone, again, that these Dems through Republicans of 90s, such that now as Clintons’ nineties seem the root source of most of our troubles it must not have been the Republicans of nineties fault for these Dems would have already blamed them, right?

Have the Democrats gone soft, and taken the economy with them?

So what if "Hillary" chase the "MARTYR" and pulled up short for selfish personal political gain leaving her crusading as "slop" just incendiary and inciting to radicals with her imperialism professing just preaching but not directing?

Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton, if you are proud of your past why aren’t you taking the credit?   Madam Secretary, if you are not proud of your past why are you "qualified" for your current office and why aren’t you apologizing? 

Slop?   Click, click, click!   What a picturesque "war of choice" further "Hillary’s Crusades" imperial towards forced women’s rights for all Afghani, but still without Dems professing that Iraqi women deserved equal treatment, by them.

Comments »

No comments yet.

Leave a comment

Publication may require admin approval; please come back later to view your comment.