6/30/2011

REAGAN DIDN’T GIVE RUSSIA A “RESET” BUTTON

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 4:28 pm

The CLINTONS’ SUPRLUS set up this economic mess - set it up with Democrat Party support and then with carrying with party pride for too long so that this economic mess became unavoidable.

The CLINTONS’ SURPLUS is of a negligence, easily arguable, for events of 9/11.

But, besides these games played by Clintons and those corrupted Republicans of such political toying during 90s specific to undermining of defense and intelligence and social spending programs, the Clintons nearly as much at fault for Bush’s OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM having been a NECESSARY operation.

At the time of the CLINTONS’ SURPLUS already our United States of America was at risk already for too many cuts happening too quickly with the near trillion dollars of cuts that Republicans showed Democrats could be found and exercised.  That the CLINTONS’ SURPLUS was all politics of Democrats then defensive about such an accomplishment by Republicans and so the jerkily to needing to find another trillion to cut just to save their political hides is a fact mostly ignored or avoided.

Since 9/11 our United States of America has constantly discovered that so much of what the Clintons found to cut had to be restored into our budgets, necessarily.

Since 9/11 the arguments for finally prosecuting Saddam Hussein only got more complicated – since during the Clintons’ first term a prosecution of Saddam Hussein seemed necessary, quite.

Though because 9/11 terrorists didn’t actually break our current laws for terrorist acts until they actually pulled out the box cutters while aboard with intent it is complicated to argue all the areas where Clintons are likely reasonably negligent for their gross and irresponsible cutting of an extra trillion for their SURPLUS.

Besides that regardless of 9/11 Saddam Hussein needed prosecuting just in light of changes seeming to be happening/dawning across the Middle East, and because we would have no where to really stand and stand against Iran on nukes, fairly, if not first of a history of putting bite into sanctions on and against Saddam Hussein.

The CLINTONS’ SURPLUS was completely unnecessary and we have basically had to return much of spending items back into our budgeting and as at higher costs, necessarily.  Besides that the trillion found by Republicans may have been one trillion dollars of cuts already cut too quickly that the CLINTONS’ SURPLUS was a rash removal of another trillion of cuts suggests that it was way too much cut way too quickly and quite irresponsibly and unnecessarily.

But while considering the possible and likely "negligence" actual of both of Clinton "two-fer" and their intimate power sharing please don’t forget to consider their conceiving of derivatives program and near begging of banking friends to push such greatly so that they could push their "housing bubble" economics as essentially an unfunded federal social program - so with their personal request, seemingly, still, of their having specifically asked their banking friends "to try to find a way to gamble away" the known and expected great risks and likely destabilization.

OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM was not a war of choice but a operation long over due and very necessary.  It was started with 9/11 having made it a more difficult prosecution to balance against a war on terror of Al Qaeda - the Al Qaeda documented to have been conceived and formed specifically with "cause" to see that Saddam Hussein got brought to justice for invasion of Kuwait.

President Obama is still stuck having left no middle ground for bipartisan efforts on almost any issue and mostly because of his less reasoned thoughts on above history.  Without OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM he wouldn’t have a reasonable place to stand for "bite" in any sanctions against Iran, and, while Saddam let go as Clintons nearly set free would have been using Iran’s nuke interests to gain simple global support for rebuilding his own nuke programs just because Iran wanted them to protect them from Saddam Hussein and whatever weapons he may still have.

But besides Clintons irresponsible droning now maybe being criminal and deserving to a "baby killer Madam Secretary of War Clinton" heckling — their SURPLUS is the worse inheritance for Bush Adminstration and Obama Administration - it was completely unnecessary and very irresponsible and all selfish politics of Clinton "two-fer."

A LOWER CASE FOURTH

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 7:19 am

Good Morning (re)founders, all - sons and daughters alike.

George Stephanopoulus may still be found to be a British spy, one wanting a more limited view of "Founding Fathers" - yet not nearly as much as President Clinton now trying to stay in "effective" power into thirty years.

These of Democrat Party have been working hard against so much - so much American, historically - and are so much of demagoguing now with regular "…as we know it" ends. 

Regardless of the case of "medicare, as we know it, will end" it is far different from "medicare will end" or saying someone is "from" a town but not saying such was "born in" such town.

What do we have to fear but fear spread, as they know it, by Oxford educated elite Democrat Party messengers?  Didn’t President Clinton get some of his special training, supposedly, at Oxford University?   Wasn’t General Clinton the last British General found still fighting, as they know it, against the founding of our Union, as we know it, against all our founding fathers, especially all those of "fathers" of our Revolution as "Son’s of Liberty" with our original TEA PARTY?

How a ABC morning fluff seat filler like George Stephanopoulus can miss such simple, yet important, differences in use of English for American case, is a wonder.

We have a representative system since all our founding fathers were so well represented by their own ilk with the Founding Fathers, and though not without a lot of old effort, especially about THE FEDERALIST PAPERS, to counter the governance and ambitions of another Clinton - an earlier one, near as early or quite as early as the British General Clinton who may have been fighting for the Crown even after the Revolution was over, fighting to kill founding fathers where ever he might find them?

And now what is our Tea Party and what are its caucus leaders really up against - especially with a founding mother for her pride in John Wayne as "from" Waterloo not as "born in" Waterloo?  What of a Tea Party Caucus leader wanting to use lower case "founding fathers" to describe America as not just the property, intellectual property, of the original signers?   Why not better, like, to include all about insurrections especially about the original Tea Party, as sons and fathers all of our founding, a founding that was as much about the survival of such through its first couple or few decades?

The Clintons now complicate President Obama’s foreign policy messaging, as it is against foreign heads of state in Power too long, like over thirty years.  They complicate it as they both work to stay effectively much in power into thirty years themselves, and with clever machinations and loose interpretations especially about very questionable "commitments" of Clintons Global Initiative. 

And, Senator John Kerry so just the other day, seeming to an admissible confession of war crimes with his full cooperation, as "Congress", with Obama and Clinton use of drones with him near "you have us on drone use."

Why else would George Stephanopoulus misrepresent original, and more maternally encompassing, use of founding fathers in lower case and specific use of "from" not "born in" as per John Wayne and her Waterloo?   Seems someone of his profession was more professional about the two John Waynes of Waterloo with a explanation that John Wayne the patriot actor had lived in Waterloo for a short while at some time in his long life.  (I will have to check that but that is how I first heard these stories. — Hopefully I am not just hearing what I want to hear as the seeming British loyalists or copycats George Stephanopoulus and President Clinton, at least, seem to be.)

So, as our Fourth of July approaches let us remember how our Preamble is a "key" and "legend" specifically "cased" with unexpected use of upper and lower case emphasis to being to a proper tonal intonation of all following about our consecration by so many of our founding.