America could be better served in light of recent developments if it had a more parliamentary system with a right to call our own leaders out "on the carpet" for more than just fashion.
America could today be of calling for special elections to remove President Obama and "leadership" of Secretary Clinton, if so.
America, my America, how did we get to "two-faced" (multi-faced) Clinton now as an acceptable spokesperson in Diplomacy?
Today’s performance from Geneva another oddity near a "yang" of a Hillary of "ying" just yesterday, or vice versa – Today again she seemed justified in being publicly not whom her personal story and history would have suggested. Yes this is the same Hillary Clinton that started officially as Secretary of State with near "we won’t make human rights a priority."
Yes, my foreign readers, today again Hillary seemed near the opposite of whom she was closer to just "yesterday."
Yes, my foreign readers, she even seemed more now of "stumping" "CLINTON DEMOCRATIC GLOBAL POLITIC" and not more appropriately as the top the United States of America’s top DIPLOMAT. She even seemed to get personal and personally religious, specifically, and inappropriately if not "dangerously."
Yes, my foreign readers, you may have longer memories than most Americans following Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton.
Yes, you may likely remember and consider relevant now still how "Hillary" was of "ready from day one" and as a claim that she already was acceptable to most tyrants, and dictators and autocrat regimes around the world and especially at "3 a.m." – Yes this was "Hillary" again proud that she could arise today without considering her own consistency and past remarks as governing.
Again Hillary Rodham Clinton just the "lawyer" again waking another day treating a world still moving and shifting as just another case that she could look at objectively as unrelated to her past subjective injections and inflections. Again Hillary rose as "just a lawyer" yet wanting acceptance as a personality.
Yes my foreign readers today does more than most make me near wish for America to have an option to a special election to remove and replace its leaders, peacefully and more regularly as an improved right.
Not all Americans do ignore or maybe have forgotten that our "Hillary" has been on the opposite side, and regularly, of most of what she performed as "old Hillary" today. Yes she was today more of stumping for "Bill and Hillary" globally than, so it appeared, standing convincingly loyal with President Obama. Yes she was being "Partisan" with a capital "P" today — Anyone: WHERE IS BILL? Where is Bill, the man that claims to be her President of the World?
Yes, my foreign readers, her near first official statement was near "we won’t make human rights a priority" and that with some loyalty to President Obama and his near "Bush was wrong to go into Iraq" and maybe only for such was helpful to cover-up the Clintons gross underperforming of their "8".
The size of the cover-up can and does suggest the size of a possible crime or failing — "It was all Bush’s fault" is quite possibly the largest attempt at a partisan cover-up yet advanced and attempted in the United States of America’s brief history.
Yes, my foreign readers, our "Hillary" a bad messenger for feminism and women’s rights. Yes her story and regular contradictions are of a history somehow and maybe sad of having to learn to wake up each day as if sadness and betrayals of yesterday didn’t really happen to her. Yes, my readers, this "Hillary" may have developed this "new Hillary" each day by compromise - because she accepted "Bill" and didn’t leave him to pursue her own ambitions independent of a dependence on Bill.
Where is Bill? Really, where is Bill, the man who claims to be the global leader of the Democratic party as the President of the World "Hillary" wants him to be still? Is there another story of great and regular betrayal that "Hillary" may have to explain such regularity to a another "NEW HILLARY"?
To my foreign readers, yes, this performance by "Hillary" again raises a questioning if such only possible from years of regular betrayal maybe by her "Bill". Don’t know though, but it is unseemly how she is so a "new" Hillary so proudly and disrespective to earlier "Hillary".
Yes, my readers that was a personal and religious wrap up today by Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and one that seems unlikely to have been requested by President Obama or in his personal political interests.
No, I do not know if he minds being so near a "Deputy President" to the Clinton "two-fer" still - please ask him yourselves.
Yes our Congress does seem to have the right to impeach or proceed to an impeachment of an officer of an administration like Secretary of State Clinton without necessarily moving also to an impeachment of the President. But, please, while you are questioning President Obama yourselves would you ask him about both Martin Luthers - Martin Luther the arguable "father" of "buying Christian forgiveness" and then Martin Luther King Jr. and for his once timely near "a job for every black man"?
And to my foreign readers, please do consider today is much about both Martin Luthers as both (all) Hillary Rodham Clintons. Seems MLK Jr. was political and correct in his day for calling near for "a job for all black men" yet with us now to a today where people of all races shouldn’t feel a need for a job or a right to a job - a "purpose" maybe, yes, but not a "job" certain and guaranteed, right?
Hmmm, which is the evil and which is the good - is consistence at all important? Which is the real yang - which is the real ying - does it matter which "Hillary" was yesterday if appearing the other today?
America now has a problem far different than China.
We have very different recent histories, and us with very different people.
Where Americans now near all have to consider the possibility of new taxes they do not necessarily have to be of an assumption that new taxes must mean higher taxes - higher "net" across all their taxings.
As China may now have money and enough to buy up our debts they still may be better "buffered" behind their wall - they may now be prudent to using the United States of America to launder their international contributions.
China may already have one or two "colonies" developing in Africa yet as per like of Libya the most homogeneous China may be best to "stay more behind their wall." For China to assert as per even just Libya an "authority" could suggest a pride "homogeneous" and "superior" that could be misunderstood.
America does now have a problem quite different that China - and yes more in Middle East likely already know more english than chinese, and while English and Europeans, as per Libya, seem to have a greater selfishness.
Sure we may have been better to a "stimulus" more like recent domestic (domestic to China) efforts, and with such more "capitalistic" than such as Obama’s domestic economics. And, yes we are as Americans now of a time where we may need to see some local taxes increased but with not "net" increase in overall taxation as Americans - we are of a time where Chinese "stimulus" likely would have been better for us, and, where if local taxes increase costs around federal taxation and spending could come down and to a "more efficient".
Yes we have a different problem globally than China and may be well positioned to do international money laundering for them so that a more sudden reaching beyond their wall doesn’t seem a vast reaching by a superior homogeneous people.
Really, President Obama is of a time where local taxes could and likely should be increased but such that federal taxes can be reduced.
Really, President Obama has more than just the Chinese wall now relevant and suggestive - he has his failed stimulus - he has public popular uprisings suggestive that his "federal spending" is too much federal spending.
Really, we would have been better to have attempted an economic "stimulating" more like China did domestically.
But alas, President Obama seems at a wall, a different wall - how now to sell, democratically, that cities and counties should rework their taxation and valuations and so that they alone are to raising taxes and such that Americans can look to federal taxation lowered?
But alas, how now to a greater efficiency that can bring cost reduction and while America still has rare global stature of having a entirely volunteer Armed Forces, best so suited/uniformed to a global policing?
And, still, what though to do about Secretary of State Clinton, with President Obama, have been to so much "giving" when of a time that "collecting" was finally sellable and reasonable?
It is ok. We don’t need to expect union solidarity from Hollywood today.
Los Angeles! Los Angeles! Los Angeles!
So many wannabees have bigger boulders to push tonight.
Los Angeles! Los Angeles! Los Angeles!
It is ok - they have an uphill battle themselves tonight.
Los Angeles! Los Angeles! Los Angeles!
Are you ready for a RISE OF THE QUEEN?
LOS ANGELES? LOS ANGELES? LOS ANGELES?
Seems a night for me to view THE MACHURIAN CANDIDATE & CITIZEN KANE back to back - not sure in which order.
LOS ANGELES? LOS ANGELES? LOS ANGELES?
What are you, so many of you, doing sharing the "Clintons’ Hell"?
Yes "en ingles" "THE ANGELS" - or is it "THE CITY OF THE ANGELS"?
The hedge and row of the Clintons’ eight years now obviously misguided.
How did their angels share there lack of "leadership"?
It is ok - We don’t need union solidarity tonight - it wouldn’t be "leadership"!
So much for so many of LOS ANGELES to learn O’ a 90’s not really O’ the Clintons.
Grunts of Hollywood now needed otherwise - about our cities and counties.
How many of LOS ANGELES can rally and climb now?
See the Clintons’ economic team couldn’t do a sequel successfully - hmmm?
Los Angeles! Los Angeles! Los Angeles!
California has its own problems, and New York - And now CNN cut wrong host.
And Los Angeles! And Los Angeles! And Los Angeles!
It is ok - they have an uphill battle themselves tonight.
See? See that our Governors now of either 2011 as " THE YEAR OF OUR MAYORS" or "THE YEAR OF OUR GOVERNORs"?
The eight years of the Clintons established as misguided - the Bush years of a story of fixing as much as possible from such.
Our mayors now may need to raise taxes - The Clinton economic team couldn’t do a sequel.
Our mayors now may need to raise taxes - Solidarity from Hollywood would be bad medicine, now.
Our mayors now may need to raise taxes - Times like these so global has these the days for such.
Our mayors now may need to raise taxes - Time to see if the haves like their community enough, or have another place they can go to.
So many wannabees have bigger boulders to push tonight.
Time to see our mayors only raise taxes - time to see if the haves actually like their communities enough?
So many of LOS ANGELES still fallen and about the misdirected hedge and rows of Clintons and especially their eight years after their eight years of trying to work an effective highjacking of Bush Admin power.
SOLIDARITY? SOLIDARITY? SOLIDARITY?
So many wannabees have bigger boulders to push tonight.
If mayors are reasonable and spending "businesslike" these really are the days to check the Feds and exercise local tax burden debate and adjustments - Do the haves like their communities enough - Do they have an escape? Much can be done cheaper yet just as well if done as a community.
SOLIDARITY! SOLIDARITY! SOLIDARITY!
Are you still of the C.C.C.R. [the CLINTON COLLECTIVE COLLAPSE RETREATS]?
Are you still with the Clintons’ hedge such that you still are working to a RISE OF THE QUEEN - A GLOBAL QUEENDOM FOR HILLARY?
Or are you less of such UN-AMERICANISM so viral in our AMERICANA?
LOS ANGELES? LOS ANGELES? LOS ANGELES?
"COLLECTIVE" is out of fashion — "COLLECTIVE" dinosaur to the "SOCIAL MEDIA"?
NIXON IS SMARTING?
NIXON IS SMARTING - HE LOST HIS FIRST CAMPAIGN TO A CLASSMATE NAMED LOGUE, AT WHITTIER HIGH SCHOOL.
SOLIDARITY? SOLIDARITY? SOLIDARITY?
Really! How much do the "haves" of our country like their communities - better to tax someone you know and have personally debated than to push it higher and higher so that all just become numbers?
Aren’t you tired of just being a number?
The Clintons’ economic team couldn’t do a sequel successfully - hmmm. - Do we have any choice now?
Keep it real! Keep it local!
KEEP IT LOCAL? SOLIDARITY? SOLIDARITY? SOLIDARITY?
Hmmm! Seems we haven’t heard President Obama take back his "all Bush’s fault" or his own "Iraq was wrong" - and yet now we have democracy spreading, rightly. President Obama was wrong, must be, and now I am not sure I like being right now for then I was right from 1991-1993 with my thinking about my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM, and, that Clintons, together, still not. I guess I as well was right that day on the Annapolis waters sailing/racing when original to new movie idea that America was ready for a new Academy movie and even one this time about Naval Academy.
Hmmm. CITIZEN KANE or THE MANCHURIAN CANDIDATE first, hmmm?
Well at least the eight years of helping Bush fix the mess the Clintons had made and left now seems more worth the effort - are you following change in Middle East that has caught Clintons and Obama unprepared?
It is ok - we don’t need or shouldn’t expect solidarity from LOS ANGELES tonight!
Yes, THE ANGELS - and while wondering how many got trapped sharing the Clintons’ HELL.
What a week!
I’ld like to thank the ________________, and ______________, and __________________
Did you catch the bit about former Senator Christopher Dodd having dated PRINCESS LEAH re-reported as old news new again?
Well, it was interesting that just the other day I went out for another long walk around Connecticut, its Milford and Orange area, and happened coincidentally to walk by an old movie mega-theater parking lot, a lot now a construction site with new steal rising. It was quite interesting that this time had me remembering a day, years ago, in such parking lot when I volunteered that I didn’t see a movie "showing" that I cared to see. And then also "you know what I would pay to see? — Lucas should re-release the original STAR WARS movies. I would want to see those again." (paraphrased from memory)
Hello Wolfgang, I do mean to meet you in person one of these days - are you hosting another OSCAR party this year? Still haven’t tried any of your restaurants but did once spend a year plus with your frozen pizza as part of my food-rep work around Connecticut.
Hello former wife of Darth Vader, as the story went/goes. I cannot forget - and am grateful that my request to your PR agent seemed to be passed as requested all around Hollywood back then to get the word out that none of my musing and support to any out there (except Extreme Home Makeover) was to be considered or profered in any way to help "Hillary for President." Those were some fun notes - I didn’t realize Senator Dodd had dated your daughter. Hello Kelly Bush, I guess I was before David Geffen as a "Hollywood" concern with a proclamation against the Clintons, his seemed to go maybe further, though.
Gosh Senator Dodd, I think I may have known you more than half my life. I was probably still at Villanova as an undergrad when my sister, then one of your receptionists, introduced us in your office. Last time we were in the same room you were having a "swearing in party" about 1999 when I happened to walk in with Senator Lieberman, and was able to say hello to your other receptionist from back when. Good luck with the Motion Picture job.
Ok, Dowd - Mayor Rahm in a TUTU, stuck. Seems his message to his former employer is that community service actually is best done at a community level, do you agree?
I’ld like to thank my Mom and my Dad and ____________ and _____________ and _____________.
Really scary, you all, this pirate story about American missionaries on the Somali seas or there abouts – Was that an "O~~~" on that big front sail and looking like a "mark" of "Obama" as so of B~~~ O~~~ signature marking? Was it just a Q for QUEST – surely it wasn’t out there so large in front of the boat looking like an "Obama" letter of marque notice?
My long walk around Connecticut was a theme walk to browse cooking and food supply stores in the area, and even the RESTAURANT DEPOT across from the old theater parking lot earlier mentioned. I just happened to walk into the one store in the area that may sell QUALITE (sp?) with such a "Q" cookware - got me to wondering. ("long walk" implies I measured by hours not miles and in this case at least another three plus.) It was fun making my first visit to "wear the restaurants shop." I am not sure when I might need a fifty pound bag of flour, though.
I really want to thank all my artist friends who honored my wishes to avoid any use of my past support and musing to benefit the Clintons. Thanks and especially for them so selfishly about as they were of ‘Hillary the Inevitable."
What a week!
Really sad about those American sailors. I have learned since that some or many sailors ship their vessels over such seas and resume their cruises maybe even from Bahrain.
What a week!
Got me to thinking about Iran, finally and in a new way. It has dawned on me, after catching RICH STEVE’S IRAN episode and learning that Iran has passed laws to forbid casual sex, that Iran may be onto something or not that we should look at as Americans when wondering on our healthcare reforms. Still wondering, now while considering Iran’s ban on casual sex so balanced globally with "the man who claims to be President of the World" - Bill Clinton - essentially the far left to Iran’s far right. President Clinton is quite the global lobbyist for casual sex and so is about as far to the other extreme from Ahmadinejad as America can produce.
What a week!
President Clinton makes American Republicans seem like a GLOBAL MIDDLE WAY in light of Iran’s conservatism. But about "Obamacare" and healthcare reforms - has such a ban in Iran caused their healthcare cost to climb or fall?
Is President Clinton’s specific efforts now unavoidable to higher healthcare costs or lower? Are we now as "grateful" to Clintons as we have to consider with old report of healthcare statistic something like and near << If we could get back to the average personal weights for Americans before the Clintons took office we could save a trillion dollars in healthcare spending. >>
How did this become our nations business?
Mayor Tutu? The other mayors? Did Hillary ask for KING OF QUEENS to help her hubby feel more comfortable in his natural character and habits? Who did so set America about "UPS" deliveries to a more happily rotundity? Seems of the hand and mind of First Lady Hillary - or just President Bill, maybe, alone. Still remember an annoyance that nation was being let out to such so near seeing its first trailer/tease.
What a week!
What can we learn from Iran other than that when scaled against President Clinton as the global lobby for casual sex the American Republicans show as a global middle way?
Dowd, Maureen Dowd, is "BLACK SWAN LAKESIDE" MAYOR - The "tutu Mayor" - really spinning a ’Community service is best done at a commune level, among neighbors - Sorry for the earlier misdirection.’?
What a week! And I’ld also like to thank _________________!
Oh, and Stan Rosenfield, you too.
We should now all take a moment "of silence" and even maybe a moment of meditation or relection.
If you will - Now a consideration of Indiana’s "Only a penitent man may pass."
Oh, yeh - Indian Jones with line here replayed from memory - not with a movie fact checking.
In part today is of an: "It’s not like he had a finger stuck in his face with ‘…or else’" And: Wow, where has Rahm disappeared to now in this the year of Governors?
I have no idea what is going on in Chicago, in this year, so much already a year of our Governors. Do they have a free and independent media - has social media ban banned since Obama got elected using it to gain national power?
It is not like he is President Clinton of humilation of impeachment and disbarments and having taken to a penitential touring of Africa speaking and appearing to promote safer sex and multiple partner awarenesses.
Has anyone seen Rahm? Where has he disappeared to - disappeared to in this the year already so much a year of our Governors?
No, this is more about an alternate history - this is about what could have been.
Seems the issue today is more about all the condoms and prophylactics pushed by Clintons at least during their eight years.
Seems the issues today have to be so also about the Middle East and Muslim pride about current demographics, and even now to a closer reporting as to whether the average age reported so near or over 60% in general populace is of a balance near enough female to male.
Fox isn’t alone in such perpetuation of a confusion suggestive that the Middle East has 60+% of its population all under the age of 30 and all young males without any home life or hope.
Rahm has other more pressing problems now and President Clinton is happy as an unchecked and unbalanced non-state actor. Who can we look to now? Rahm has a Governor to remind him he wasn’t elected Governor or Illinois new grand leader. Bill is just rogue.
Now about a current alternate possible economic and balance of power:
If Clintons hadn’t pushed so many prophylactics would we here in America have enough in a new generation already matured as a largely new gen of American Christians actually born and now so to employed, and, available as consumers for our excess housing and consumables?
But for all the prophylactics Clintons pushed just in America would we not even be asking if we had a critical mass enough to assure a peace? Should America now mandate family size for its own survival and with an upping of here-to-fore planned family sizes?
As per all the walking by a seeming penitent former President Clinton with his travels around Africa speaking to safer sex and multi-partner awarenesses: Such lives not created there still likely would be too young to already be compatriots and allies but with toy guns – but was this something his Hillary demanded he do - how did such post presidency turn to such an alerting?
So, again: Our Constitution was "ratified" so ordaining it "in the Year of our Lord…" with a use of the Christian Calender — How many more American Christians might have been born during the Clintons’ years?
So, again, American isn’t allowed to wage a "Holy War", Constitutionally speaking, is it?
Is our best defense now to start making more Americans and hope our allies are with us enough in the mean time?
Luckily for now a new Middle East challenges all Christians equally and while American Christians still of a grace and even "honeymoon" for recent shown willingness to stand and sacrifice along side all Iraqi people. Is a godless Russia at greater theat?
With new balance of power a pressing question and more so for us of so many fewer born in America during the Clintons’ years as may have naturally occured and celebratorilly - at least now we don’t have Ba’athist Saddam Hussein offering and insisting to send his Republican Guard into neighbor countries to restore peace and balance.
Well we seem most definitely about 2011 as a "YEAR OF OUR GOVERNORS" and maybe even of the young of Middle East not quite looking at global demographics quite the same way we have been.
Surely President of the World Clinton has all the answers already even if he is now an unchecked and unbalance non-state actor himself - right?
Maybe it was just a phase.
Maybe all the excess housing we now have still would have been too early to the party.
So which are our allies - which of such are Judeo-Christian allies? At least since we finally prosecuted Saddam Hussein we still have global moral street reputation of actually standing for universal rights more globally and equally. And now may less have to argue with fellow Americans about how it may be unconstitutional for the United States of America to wage a "HOLY WAR" or conduct a just operation without it being a "Holy War."
We did our duty - now what?
Are we to now a: Do we have enough Americans to a relaxed mass sufficient to assured peace?
How much work needed now to alliances? — Have you hugged a Clintonista today?
This is not about Iran!
To be about Iran it would have to be more about DHS (Department of Homeland Security) than I mean or intend.
We are about now, more than just here, efforts to a new and better bureaucratic. We are about a times that seem harder to understand largely because of how often we had been mislead and misdirected during the Clintons’ years. More than just Americans are paying for the Clintons happy to be years of doing say 80% and leaving so the hard and necessary to an actual ’solution’ in a regular practice to avoid near 20% quite necessary about such.
They got their popularity and we got something worse, but not necessarily so for those years.
They, you could say, just tried punting on the hard parts of the politics they were about, or were just amatuers who didn’t know better - rank amatuers even. Much of what they did was popular and of good intent and maybe even inspired for such years. Such though throughout their eight years needed a full effort and not a mellow punting on the hard say 20% they could count on Americans just assuming them of and about with diligence, yet not in reality.
Well, this is inseparable from Iran, actually. But this is not written to be about Iran’s Neda.
This is about our own disasters and maybe some others, this is about our readiness and bureaucracy about Federal Emergencies.
This is not really about the "leadership" failures of Clintons about New Orleans and its "MR GO" (Mississippi River Gulf Outlet) or specifically about Clintons’ years of FEMA budgeting or performance. This isn’t even about how the now laughable "PEACE DIVIDENDS" of the Clintons’ year may have underfunded FEMA and as well any military cooperation for emergencies.
Clintons’ PEACE DIVIDENDS seem now sadly laughable and only maybe more so than CLINTOMICS and their specific encouragement of risky lending. But this is more about a new and improved bureaucracy for our times.
Of course this has to be some about Iran but that only because Clintons’ eight years left far more than 20% undone about Middle East – And now even George Soros seems confused about such as noticed with his recent spot claiming that people should be grateful President Bush isn’t in office now during these days of popular uprisings. Mr. Soros isn’t alone so though in necessitating a brief response about such with at least this: President Bush by attending to, finally attending to, finally to an overdue prosecution of Saddam Hussein, with forces, with Operation Iraqi Freedom, such was done allowing, that by using forces there, American forces wouldn’t be needed elsewhere for others to also achieve to same more equal rights more equally as Bush’s standing with Iraqis was about.
We in America have as much to worry about now as many around the world and even now over longer lunches. We in America have a down economy more of an accidental making by Washington meddling with liberal Democrat politics and so now a high unemployment that shouldn’t and maybe cannot be blamed upon any of now unemployed – That is an old story now but still we have the collatoral damage. Republicans may now have to entertain once more objected to government intervention. Republicans may look at solutions now for economy that have policies and priorities that historically were considered undesired meddling that now would be corrective and necessary to an undoing of the really undesired governance that caused these current economics.
Yes, our Federal Government may need to now meddle to fix the economy and meddle about even a job rationing and because the people are largely victims now of ideological Democrat governance. But, still most of such may best be profered at state and local levels. Yes, Republicans may have to embrace a federal government roll and quite contrary apparently to their proper sense of governance and as a corrective meddling.
They too may be better with longer lunches and maybe a new styling about suspenders. They though may be better for an earlier retirement – yet otherwise quite wise as well to a new VIVA LA FRENCH! Americana. It may be the best way to start growing our economy again.
But about NEDA? Well we have to consider most of our bureaucracies now!
Our Department of Homeland Security is not an ideal home for our Federal Emergency Management Agency - our FEMA should become NEDA.
We can leave the discussion about how to fix the economy until after you know better how much both Clintons are still standing selfishly in your way to a new and better economy.
In the mean time: a consideration of at least our Federal Emergency Management Agency: an organization better to be outside of our DHS: FEMA is now also of states’ budget line items. If FEMA were NEDA it wouldn’t need to be in our Department of Homeland Security it could be a stand alone organization tasked primarily to a readiness for natural emergencies. If FEMA were NEDA it would the be our NATURAL EMERGENCY DISASTER AGENCY – it could even have a fleet of NUCLEAR CHILLER SUBMARINES to cool warm waters of the Gulf of Mexico if hot spots were developing that could turn a storm into a mega storm and with a "WEATHER CORP" as crew.
As long as FEMA is of its name "Federal Emergency…" then it belongs with DHS even though its history has been primarily thought to be a dedication to storm and natural disaster response and recovery.
How now to a new and improved bureaucracy at local, state and national level and one now equally respectful of global change with popular revolts about a need for greater representation and involvement?
Surely, even with a NEDA with a fleet of unarmed NUCLEAR CHILLER SUBMARINES crewed by a WEATHER CORP, a new NEDA bureaucracy should cost as much or maybe less than a FEMA kept in and under DHS even as DHS was set up with a respect to a system in federalism and of a loose federation of states?
How much could be saved and with more employed in shorter days and with longer lunch hours at least until such can be practice as maybe our fastest way to recovering our pre-GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM economy?
How much could be saved and with an improvement maybe even in moral for now FEMA workers and such a corp of dependables if to an independent NEDA with just a couple or few annual "joint operation" training days if needed to be called up to greater "Federal Emergencies" of different regular politics and duties better to more uniformed service planning and preparations?
Yes, longer lunches and shorter working days may allow some additional employees and may be our most efficient and respectful way beyond the GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM economic crash recently a perfect storm of a confluence with a "Pelosi Congress" clinging to it’s "Clintons’ surpluses" and the Obamacare jobkilling bureaucratic construct.
Yes, we should wait to try to fix the economy until we have fully arrested the Clintons continued efforts to highjack domestic and global power to further Clinton Global Initiative to as near a Clinton Autocracy as they can get. We may need now though to consider another "socialist" solution such about "state ownership of oil" and so with a necessary consideration to look to owning Venezuela oil as better socialists.
Well, maybe less is more.
We have known how to chill water and make ice for many decades.
Power to NEDA? All hail to a federal lead about a job rationing?
Wisconsin, we can hear you! Any word from California’s public unions?
Yes, quite so still that Bush admin was of near or of an: If we prosecute Saddam Hussein and help liberate Iraqi people without occupying and colonizing them, then we likely won’t have to use force/forces for other countries peoples and may even win over Iran’s youths.
But this is about how F.E.M.A. now to N.E.D.A. may be a wise bureaucratic change, and even a new consideration of workday rituals and breaks to a better moral and more equitable employment, too.
Please don’t forget to fully consider how the Clintons are popular still for much they shouldn’t be and that much of such can and should be looked at as a corruption of their doing the easy and popular 80% on much and only letting us think they were dutifully attending to the other and more necessary 20% that had the hard work and unpopular leadership actually around and in it.
Clintons are still more of the problem then of the solution, and especially with President of the World Bill Clinton basically an unchecked or balanced non-state actor.
I remember them thinking 80% enough for their purposes and to a worrying then. Again, it probably would have been better and less costly if we had pushed a full prosecution of Saddam Hussein within the first term of the Clintons – before he started to think he might get away with so much murder and such and while the ‘intent’ of first sanctions still with original threat of a real enforcement.
The problem with ‘Berlusconi for America’ as a "leadership" example is a matter of size and proportion. An "Obama for America" caught near as well by "bunga, bunga" yet more as an innocent class war of his making not "inheriting" — President Obama has as well been about the "leadership" issue as well of near the "small people" have great "bunga, bunga" why can’t their leader(s).
The problem isn’t ’Gigi Gone Wild’ - an ‘America must become more French - more French Socialist’ — it is a matter of size and proportion - a matter of representation in a proportioned mass.
Well, maybe a problem is a little Gigi Gone Wild - but that isn’t really a new problem, is it?
If the "small people" are have good, and especially if they are to a having of a great "bunga, bunga" is it now more about making sure their is a good middle "bunga, bunga" – middle class "bunga, bunga"? Is the problem for ‘Berlusconi for America’ that for our President to be so Clintonesque ‘cubed’ a fairness and equality ‘power’ issue of federalism arises — A President can only be so for America if the governors are near unanimously also so that way to and of America. For America such would need a equal practice for a middle class as well as for the "small people" and their highest leader.
How many Italies fit inside one California? How many Italies fit west of the Mississippi? How many Italies fit south of the Mason Dixon line? How many Delawares fit inside Italy?
Where is Bill? Where is Bill? Where is Bill - the man who claims to be President of the World?
If such fair because the "small people" had there to fore been having ‘GREAT BUNGA, BUNGA’ where then is our highest leader(s) where are those of the middle - where is our middle class - and where are our governors? How many of their states fit Italies within multi-fold or theirs in Italy of one or more?
Does America need a middle class? Where are our community leaders? Where are, as well, our Governors?
And, yes! Where is "Hillary"? Where is Madam Secretary – Madam Secretary "Hillary" aka Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton? Would she have married "Bill" if he were still William Blythe III?
And, yes! In these days it isn’t the predilections, personal, of a former President or even one now extra-Constitutional and in a new un-American frontier so out there as "the man who claims to be President of the World" and without "election." It isn’t either the personal predilections of "Hillary" but where such is a "Bill" first the Constitution second, still.
Where is Bill? Where is Bill? Where is Bill - the man who claims to be President of the World?
Where is Barack? Where is the old "Barry"? Where is President Barack Hussein Obama - still near ‘We need to become more French - more French Socialist!’?
Where is Bill? Where is Bill? Where is Bill - the man who claims to be President of the World?
What happend to elections? What happened to "elected"? Where is "Hillary" - where is "Hillary" on this?
The problem with ‘Berlusconi for America’ as a "leadership" example is a matter of size and proportion? Where are our Governors? Are the "small people" having all the fun? Where is our middle class?
See, in America it isn’t about (only?) maybe similar predilections, personal, but their "leadership" example, and, now, how so few knowing their highest leadership then fraught and sloppy in their Clintons’ nineties was and is tops when explaining so much damage to collatoral and values.
It was and is their ‘economics’, stupid! It was and is their, the Clintons’, ECONOMICS - CLINTONOMICS!
Where is "Hillary"? Where is our Secretary of State on all this?
Where is Bill? Where is Bill? Where is Bill - the man that claims to be an unelected President of the World? Where are the Clintons on such only maybe "poll-based" representation of skewable statistics?
How many Chicagoes fit inside one Italy?
VIVA LA FRENCH! VIVA LA FRENCH! WE COULDN’T HAVE TOPPLED NEAR AUTOCRATIC UNITED KINGDOM WITHOUT YOU — WE COULDN’T HAVE REVOLTED TO A BETTER CONSTITUTING SUCCESS WITHOUT YOU!
What is fair for the middle and the masses or our high leaders if the "small people" are having great "bunga, bunga"?
We do need to become more French! We do need to become more French!
I do wonder how the French may react to this. I do wonder but while thinking we need to become more French but not the "French Socialist" pimped by President Obama.
Viva la French — shorter work days and longer lunches with romance in the air more than war - VIVA LA FRENCH please pass the bread.
Viva la French — later retirements and now some job sharing and job rationing for America as a way to mass toasting and bread breaking for our Governors and community leaders - even to Spanish siestas?
I do wonder now how the French - the modern French may respond - and the people of the ‘middle’ leadership of governance by Scott Walker. "We need job rationing!"? - "We need job sharing!"?
President Obama, how about you still to a ‘we need to become more French’ but of a different "Frenchism" than you were origially about ineffectively for undue respect to representative "size" and "proportions"? Yes, "Hillary" is a hinderance - the Clintons’ eight years now seem near all wrong and especially so for their eight years also "eastern to the middle rhelms" regular and "official" about "Shia incapable of governing themselves" and the Clintons happy and ambitious with a "pro-Sunni" we (our "two-fer") is "ready from day one"? And especially now the specific usage those "official" years with "Iraqi Shia are incapable of governing themselves" inheritance left President Bush?
VIVA LA FRENCH! But let us again find ways to improve upon them — let us now maybe try job rationing and job sharing and with later retirement dates - and jobs now where a husband and wife (civil partners pledged for life) are encourage by society to be of the same trade and profession such that a job sharing can be well effected with one getting Tuesdays, Thursdays and alternate Saturdays or just maybe mornings and alternate Saturdays and the other the other needed hours to satisfy employer and/or clients?
VIVA LA FRENCH! Thanks again for your help with our Revolution. Maybe we will at least see now longer and more casual mid-day public dining/refreshing in America.
Where is Bill? Where is Bill? Where is Bill - the man who lets media claim him high and highest as an unelected President of the World? Where can "Hillary" come down on this - but with a cold shoulder - and official "cold shoulder"?
"Berlusconi for America" – it is a matter of size and proportion - it is a matter of representation in a proportioned mass? What is to happen when the "small people" are having all the fun?
Honey, please share the Wisconsin cheese – how much bread do we really need with it, now, especially?
Are there enough American whinning? Are there enough local vintages? And totally enough American wines?
Some "French" bad for us - not all French. Right? Thanks again for your help with our revolutions.
Thinking out of the box — Where is Bill - the man who claims to be President of the World?
George, dear, yes ‘pitty the fool’ that tries to take your recipe as their own and especially for profit - my recipe was shared without a transference of "ownership" and as it was so a recipe "original" to us.
Do you think some day "Americans" still of a United States of America will be about "keep it simple stupid" remarking? Do you think that the wisdom in our simplicity will be ignored and kneeded as "simple" and "stupid"?
Retirement is treating us just fine George, don’t you think? And, on that future "stupid" concern do you think we should now act to make our example as first elected couple and "official" and not just a "suggested behavior" such about two term limits?
George, could we craft such into just a single additional sentence into an existence, and if so would we need Jefferson or Hamilton or even Madison or Adams? Obviously we could be to a future with Americans not "citizens" of a United States of America and of a different constituting - will it haunt us if we don’t create a writ to limit a first couple to more than two "electings" as per our wisdom and our example?
Martha, Martha, Martha - where would I be without you, would we even have a country to be so discussing?
Long live Martha! Long live Martha! Martha will be remembered or else - or else ‘pitty the fools’!
Yes, George you/we may not have to be royalty to become immortals, ha, ha, ha. We don’t even have to prevent and outlaw a "touching" or "holding" of us by others.
George, though, could we fit it into just one sentence - our essence and common wisdom - can we in just one sentence even do justice about our ‘holding’ and affections and such to cover the wisdoms about "royalty" touching "holding" preventions?
Yes, Martha, we might and maybe such would be enough to guard and bulster Americans to still of a United States of America and away from becoming too "bookish"!
Oh, George - so we shouldn’t have to write it into law - its absense but with our "example" should be enough?
At least Martha a best place for Americans to start from - and yes ’pitty the fool’ who takes our recipe as there own and especially if to a profit so misappropriating our heartfelt sharing of a recipe original to us and shared only as ours.
George, if such becomes necessary the word "elected" will have to be used as strongly and actively as the word "person" don’t you think?
Martha, let us hope our example and such as of common wisdom is enough.
Okie dokie George. - have another cookie you?
Yes Martha dear - and yes you are the mother of country - I know not to say "they should have elected you" for they did "elect" you.
Honey, should we at least write about the no holding or touching of royalty practices?
No Honey. That shouldn’t be necessary to a an understanding of our ‘holdings’ and ‘touching’!
NOTE: Years later an eightieth Congress still of so conceived United States of American and such of Americans was to at least one sentence so: "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President,…" Martha seemed a little nervous - her/their example may not be enough for "elected" to be judged as important as "person" - George still hoping less is more. George can hear Martha and her concern that people may have forgotten she thought herself also "elected" and proudly through marriage. Martha still a believer that George was "the office of the President" and she daily to a holding of him and by common acts of "elections" to such as her right and honor to duty. George defers again to her wisdom and irreplaceablity and of such his duty and honor about her as a co-holder necessary and competent to such.
NOTE: Pitty the "Democrat" if a more crass example needs be aired. Pitty those that need it said like "Paul Tsongas knows a wife is also ‘elected’" or even to a more crass "Jonathan Edwards, knows that Americans expect the wife to be also ‘elected’." Pitty that American who, maybe of a too bookish, is of an oblivion about founding common sensicalities.
Note: (added a few hours after above original drafting) >> Our 22nd Amendment could just as well have been writ otherwise more exclusively or "specifically" as "No President shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice,…" and so rendered usage of "elected" more allowing to a President having a "harem" more than a "spouse." But we have it as writ "No person…"! 1+1=2 is "just dating! 1x1=1 well that is marriage!
Captains, captains - lash thee selves to your masts – a mesmerizing calling/musing you off your course - and on the rocks.
Where would we be today but for Ivan Vujacic’s stirring comment to me at AEI that day of November 2007 near a year before 2008 decidings - where would we be today without me quietly becoming concerned that "top Republicans" were of a "Top Republicans are telling me to expect ‘Hillary’ to win"?
Helen, where is your Odysseus? Yankees, where is your thrift?
Livingston and McPherson, I presume - I presume you remember me from those days of your producing the pilot for SEVEN DAYS about 16th St and Lafayette Park NE. To which of you was it that Steven Spielberg admitted knowing me and from AMISTAD and again with "but lose the van"?
Mr. Livingston, I presume you of STAR TREK - NEXT GEN were maybe only vaguely aware of how show got a starting from a near "siren’s call" across my Livingston Street and by the mesmerizing musing instrumented by her then heard wafting across the seeming safe river of my Livingston Street. And, how so that my friends from then Special Olympic Games Organizing were about my thoughts and near to "mesmerized" and them then much about business of BORG WARNER automobile sensor business?
Mr. McPherson, I presume you too of a professional aiding about lessons of the Sirens and the dangers about their mesmerizing musing. Did you know that if I were to cross Livingston about such music instrumented I were to have been of a real "mesmerized" by a real Kate Janeway - I do not remember her "instrument" played so classically to a wafting about my rivers.
Mr. Twain, at one hundred, sorry about you going bankrupt from keeping your word to General Grant to see through to publishing his memoirs – my growing up near a small river made classical images more than just yours of big rivers hard to quite imagine - especially of sail vessels near careening. Ahh, there’s the rub of Sam Clemens, too.
Fans of Harry, of all Potter books and the seven of eight movies: I have yet to decide to read a one of them and for a muses perogative allowes and precedes, wise enough still, maybe. Fans of Harry "Dumbledore" doth arose from a purple double Dutch style front door (Dutch doubledore) across from such "mesmerizing" music of old Rhine whines. Oh Lorelie? Oh, and, Griffendore? Yes, and Gryffindor doth also harken a safeharbor "squawk" and now less from another old Special Olympic Organizing friend then in PR for Griffin Hospital - Hi Gerri, how is it being now first lady to Talbots chief accountant once ESPN’s back when? How’s the PR business treating you?
Yale Daily and so about Gilmore and girls: Oh, yes that is another one.
Beware the classical mesmerizing on every river even your own street a river poetic.
There to was a real Officer Barone, but he may be the least of your worries.
Gone Carney "media circus" the President’s stripes may be the most of his troubles – the two tone beige "earth tones" so ovalized and ovaltined. Bad enough for me his embrace of beaten Clintons but to then decorate his lair/home office with the colors of the 1968 Cal 25 sailboat "SEPTEMBER WIND" (see cal25.com "restoration" tab and "photo gallery" tab for "before" and "after")? And such that I put a handmade by me black sail cover upon after restoring such cruiser/racer to original gel coat colors in expensive automobile Imron paints matched as of a 60’s GM beige and a Ford 60’s beige? That there is the most of his pouring salt in me wounds of battles past to protect peeps from the Clintons and their regular lowering of "revelry" standards. Such was a boat I spent over five years carefully restoring and had to sell to afford the independence and time to defeat the Clinton "two-fer" from yet another election to our office of the President and it so of a cozy home office.
Helen, where is your Odysseus? Yankees, where is your thrift?
And with just simple logic an ‘electing of a spouse’ is always some also an ‘electing’ some of the other spouse and never to a setting asunder otherwise of their marriage union and its legal protections, local and national. An electing of one spouse is never not an ‘electing’ at least some of the other spouse - the spouse only to such a co-holding of White House and its home office by legal ‘electing’ of a union so inseparable.
And, really what is our standard such that no one law is supposed to contravene another law?
And now our revelry?
Seems Larry Summers is at least right about "Hillary’s" simple arithmetic for 1 crossed by 1 equals 1 - not a loose "two-fer" to of a legal two.
Yes I so did cover the BOOM with a handmade and fit and sewn by me black sunbrella sailcloath cover, and still have been to a reading of "BOOM" that rightly seemed to follow such as my restoration of a classic from 1968.
Fans of Harry, you are my peeps, and so are many others – yes I challenged J.K. Rowling with a pre Google "googled" search for an unkwnown by motivated author and to specifically write seven books for seven separate years of advancing curriculum and secretly with me of to such to protect future generations from the Clintons I knew already too well. Yes Harry Potter had its start as to a buffer and protection from the lowering of revelry standards regular by Clintons.
It has now been a little while since I sat near-on a window sill at American Enterprise Institute and found myself talking over lunch with Ambassador Ivan Vujacic then the Serbian Ambassador to the United States of America.
He let me do most of the talking and mostly only added a "but that isn’t what most in DC are saying" and "but that isn’t what top Republicans are telling me."
Abassador Ivan Vujacic is just one of my "witnesses" of those days I was still in DC - He is though may the one most to hear me through across most of my reasoning as to why Senator Hillary Clinton wouldn’t win and shouldn’t win the presidency.
He was quite surprised at first but maybe not so near the end of such luncheon break when I had time to explain how and why President Bush’s Iraq policies were right and necessary and even to a necessary global standard operating procedure that should be a better foundation for even Serbia.
He has since been recalled to Serbia, but that day I was in a very small minority so stating and explaining that Senator Hillary Clinton should not and would not win the 2008 Presidential election.
Sure since the day she announce an attempt to get the Clinton "two-fer" elected to more years in the White House I did basically go on a Randian strike kind of like in Atlas Shrugged. Sure I had to sell off boats and other material goods and take to living a plainer life to afford the time and proper independence to prove my points. Yes, if you knew me then you likely thought I owned too much for a DC area one bedroom apartment dweller, and you would be very right - it has taken me years to become "reorganized" those years of having so much.
Looking back it seems I don’t have to reverse or take back a single point or argument of mine about Clintons and reasons that their "two-fer" couldn’t and shouldn’t get elected again.
Quite possibly those were the months and years I was near in the smallest "minority" on an issue in my life, and yet still.
We weren’t actually sitting on the window sill at AEI that day but in chairs juggling luncheon plates while eating and chatting. I have sat on the window sills their for other events if I recall correctly. We were there that day for an event honoring long time Soviet expert and author, Robert Conquest. And, I so maybe even accidentally there that day for having miswritten a note for an event that had actually been the day before.
I really should find a publisher - these blogs have been written to flow one to another and into book form too. Especially the first year of jphogan.org blogged 227 now mostly "hidden" since first anniversary. Seems very little editing for content correction due to subject or "conclusion" error maybe called for.
It really seemed I was near in a minority of near one back in the early days of my eruditions that Clintons’ ‘two-fer’ couldn’t and shouldn’t win another election to more terms.
BEWARE THE TEMPTATIONS! BEWARE THE TREATS!
BEWARE THE BAGGAGE ON THE MESSENGER?
Once upon a day, in a country of pre Clintons’ "dime" novellas renderings - in a land once more conservative — or is it now too late to even consider such?
In a country now post 60’s anti-parents’ and grandparents’ more "conservative" and maybe prudent - now what?
It’s a soroity world? Just a little less "members/autocrats only"?
Where is Bill?
For today of a "Hillary" posturing proudly so with an attempt to be proud of her posture of 90s and about internet and such - we got baggage!
BEWARE THE EXTREME MAKEOVER? — BEWARE ANOTHER "COMEBACK"?
<<< BEWARE!!! >>>
Her’s, the "messenger’s", hope may be to use what is now arguably "in the public domain" via new media blogging to posture past and to a posture present with a gaming about herself and her "baggage" such that what is of known and public today can cover her/their misappropriations of such of 90s that wasn’t "in the public domain" for them to lift and supplant as their own.
Very clever, she can be presented as. BEWARE!!! BEWARE OF THE MESSENGER!!! BEWARE OF THE MESSENGER AND COLLATORAL "BAGGAGE"!!!
TAGGED! & CHECKED! Her/their "baggage" is with her and everytime an airing of a posturing to a proud of her 90s.
President Obama you are complicit!
President Barack Hussein Obama on global internet and messaging you are now complicit.
Presidents Clinton and President Obama such posturing has with it so aired "EATIN’ AIN’T CHEATIN’"!
BEWARE THE BAGGAGE OF THE MESSENGERS!!!
BEWARE!!! We have an expectation now for the White House to clarify, their message has "baggage."
Oh, and really!!!: WHERE IS BILL? WHERE IS THE OTHER HALF OF CLINTON TWO-FER?
You may have to be as brave as I was brave today – you may have to consider some culinary too.
A free-for-all here now I share of - of a recipe new - a new recipe mine - yes a cookie recipe.
Yes here now I share a recipe not that of the Culinary Institute of America aka the CIA.
I have survived my own recipe creation for a new cookie - a banana chocolate chocolate chip cookie.
Probably best I don’t put up a recipe tomorrow - God only knows how that might get interpreted.
It was probably a United States Department of Education that had me in middle school at East Rock Community School learning how to cook and bake in a required Home Economics Class- I don’t know for certain. I did though have a chance at home to learn some baking too - and such that Home Economics may not have been necessary as a federal program - I was curious about how most things that seemed simple enough to maybe understand might be understood.
I was also encouraged with middle school Industrial Arts in woodworking and a curiousity to metal working. Such school had the money for metal working equipment in its industrial arts wing when designed and constructed - but somehow didn’t seem to have the money to have an instructor of/for metal working. Yes a "curiousity" to metal working it was from using so many metal working tools as drying benches for woodworking projects and so with a wondering to what they might actually be designed for.
Yes, my new just invented BANANA CHOCOLATE CHOCOLATE CHIP COOKIES is not a CIA recipe.
And yes this recipe is now recommended and a free for all.
BANANA CHOCOLATE CHIP COOKIES
2 1/4 cups all purpose flour/3+ tablespoons of unsweetened cocoa powder/3/4 cup of granulated sugar/1 tablespoon molasses/1 teaspoon baking powder/1 teaspoon salt/1 teaspoon vanilla extract/2 extra large eggs/1 cup (two sticks) butter -softened/one ripe medium banana/1 cup chocolate chip morsels.
Preheat oven to 375 degrees.
Cream softened butter and add in sugar, cocoa, baking powder, salt, molasses, vanilla extract and eggs. Cream all thoroughly together using two butter knifes to cream or a mixer - add the banana and remix. Gradually mix in the flour and then the chocolate chips. Adjust ingredient amounts some if you are so inspired.
Waiver: I just made this for the first time today and with a yield of near 48 cookies baked at 375 degrees for about eleven minutes. Cookie dough was placed on buttered cookie sheet to near the size of a golf ball or ping pong ball and pressed and shaped by hand. Cookies were dolloped onto cookie sheet using two tablespoons.
Yummy to me - maybe to you too. Had a banana I didn’t know how I wanted to consume or when and then wondered on making more Chocolate Scotch Shortbread cookies or trying an original banana cookie. Did look to Tollhouse Chips bag to consider baking science more for a chip cookie than a shortbread and then adapted and wondered. Note: "chocolate" in "Chocolate Scotch Shortbread" also my creation/adaptation and maybe such better to be not as a side dish for scotch - though maybe bourbon or another such or just milk. First made such "shortbreads" as a new pistachio chocolate adaptation. Maybe still a "Scotch Shortbread" but that may depend on the scotch.
Yes it is probably better I don’t post this tomorrow - God only knows how that might be interpreted.
I should ask maybe this mentioned CIA though about "banana cookies" since what I don’t know and haven’t figured and about a life lived so far without now a memory of a "banana cookie" before is only a simple scientific question as to "shelf life" and "refrigeration"/"freezing." For now I am content to test such myself or not – like other good cookies they may not survive the night.
NOTE: You don’t expect me to always write about politics - do you? And, maybe you are glad I didn’t blog about rewiring garage/barn lighting for my mom the other day with a relocating of one socket location and an additional socket via permanent wiring extenting and as well the conversion of another incandescent socket to a small strip flurescent fixture. I don’t have occassion to dig out and use my specialty Klein electrical tools as much as I used to - it was good to find such old friends again, and my Wiggy voltmeter and non-contact voltage checker.
I was tiring of too many hours keeping up with political shows and have been now newly about some of cooking shows and personalities so showcased. A curiousity took hold anew.
Learning to cook a variety of Chinese stir fry dishes came later and to much of my sustenance, self sustenance while living off-campus my junior and senior years at Villanova University. Recently I have been working off the recipes and successfully - "off the recipes" = without the recipes.
HEAVE! HEAVE! HEAVE! WE MUST GET THE LAST STONES IN PLACE!
TICK TOCK - TICK TOCK - WE HAVE MERE MOMENTS UNTIL THE LAST WALK ABOUT ROUNDS UP THE LAST OF CAST OF LOYALS.
HEAVE! HEAVE! HEAVE! KEEP THE PACE - WE MUST LOCK DOWN THE CHANGE!
DON’T WALK LIKE AN AMERICAN - EMBRACE THE CHANGE - WALK LIKE AN EGYPTIAN - LIVE YOUR ‘CHANGE’!
AMERICAN DEMOCRATS ARE SCARED!
AMERICAN REPUBLICAN ARE NEAR ‘JEALOUS WITH ENVY’!
TEA PARTIERS WANT TO BE LINKED TO YOUR TOURISM BOARDS.
NON-STATE ACTOR "BILL" AGAIN AT THE MERCY OF OUR CONGRESS AND FOR OUR CONSTITUTION EMPOWERS CONGRESS TO APPROVE ALL GIFTS BY KINGS AND PRINCES AND FOREIGN OFFICERS TO AN OFFICER LIKE "BILL" OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. "BILL" IS NOT ‘BELIEVABLE’ AS A NGO (NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION) – HE IS STILL BASICALLY ON OUR PAYROLL – AND AS WELL COMPROMISED WITH CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AS ALSO OF THE PAY OF OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF STATE TO SHARED MARRITAL WEALTH.
STATE ACTOR "HILLARY" AT RISK AS A ‘LOYAL’ TO ANOTHER POLITICAL ‘BURIED ALIVE’? IF NOT THE "HILLARY" OF YESTERDAY - OF YESTERDAY’S BLOG - THEN A "HILLARY" AS A DOMINATRIX FROM 1993-2000 AND ‘SUPERIOR’ TO "BILL" ALL ALONG AND ALREADY OF HER MAX SERVING OF EIGHT YEARS? NOT SURE WHICH IS WORSE FOR US OR FOR HER - SHE WASN’T ALL THESE YEARS AND COULDN’T CHANGE! OR, SHE WAS ALL THESE YEARS AND CANNOT CHANGE!
ROUND UP THE LOYALS — ROUND UP THE ROYALS?
KEEP THE PACE - WALK LIKE AN EGYPTIAN - LIVE YOUR CHANGE!
HEAVE! HEAVE! HEAVE! WE MUST GET THE LAST STONE READY.
TICK TOCK - TICK TOCK – THIS IS SCARING WASHINGTON ESTABLISHMENT DEMOCRAT LIBERALS SILLY! YOUR NOT ALLOWED TO SUSPEND YOUR ESTABLISHMENT GOVERNMENT AND WALK AND LIVE ON YOUR HONOR LOCALLY AND PEACEFULLY SUCH THAT SOME OR MANY MIGHT DISCOVER AND AFFIRM SAVINGS FROM THEN TO FOR "NECESSARY" BUREAUCRATIC TOP DOWN REIGNING.
TICK TOCK - TICK TOCK – WE HAVE MERE MOMENTS UNTIL THE LAST WALK ABOUT ROUNDS UP THE LAST OF THE CAST OF LOYALS!
HEAVE! HEAVE! HEAVE! WHAT? OUR TOURISM BOARDS? OH. YES SEE THE FELLA WITH THE BROOM OVER THERE.
THANK YOU, REALLY – THANK YOU! YES, I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE NILE, TOO, AND YES I DO HOPE TO LEARN TO MILK AND RIDE A CAMEL.
CAN YOU TELL ME THOUGH, DID YOU ALL REALLY USED TO BURY THE ENTIRE CAST ALIVE?
SWEEP!!! SWEEP!!! SWEEP!!! NO, NOT USUALLY, WE WERE MORE REGULAR TO KILLING THEM AND THEN BURYING THEM ORDERLY ALONG SIDE AS A ENTIRE CAST TOGETHER FOR THE JOURNEY - SEE MOST REMAINS HAVE ALL BEEN FOUND NEATLY ORGANIZED/COMPARTMENTALIZED?
YES! NA’AM? WHY? LIMAADHAA?
HEARD YOU WERE ALL JEALOUS OF OUR EGYPTIAN REVOLUTION. I HEARD YOU WISH YOU TOO COULD JUST SUSPEND FEDERAL ESTABLISHMENT GOVERNMENT AND SPENDING FOR JUST A YEAR AND ALSO DISCOVER FOR YOURSELVES HOW LOCAL AND PERSONAL SOLUTIONS ON THE HONOR AND PEACEFULNESS OF YOUR OWN PEOPLE MIGHT FINDS SAVINGS NEEDED THAT OTHERWISE MAY NEVER GET FOUND.
NA’AM! OH, ALL THE POSSIBLE SAVINGS WE MAY NEVER FIND AND ALL THE BETTER LOCAL AND COMMUNITY BASED SOLUTIONS WE WON’T BE ALLOWED TO.
LAA, ANAA AASIF.
SWEEP!!! SWEEP!!! SWEEP!!! ATAMANAA LAKA IJAAZA SA’IIDA!
SWEEP! HAVE A NICE VACATION! YOUR DEMOCRATS ARE SCARED?
NA’AM! YES, THEIR "NECESSARY SPENDING" MAY NOT BE "NECESSARY"!
Hillary was the "martial law" candidate in 2008.
She was the candidate with the government funded storm troopers duty bound to maxed pomp and circumstance.
And yet President Barack Obama isn’t a TEA PARTIER.
Math must have something to do with this.
How did "THE INEVITABLE" not add up?
Was it that on her face it seemed, especially while waxing proudly about "Bill" as AMBASSADOR TO THE WORLD, that she wanted and "election" again of the "Clinton two-fer" to keep her cast in a "supporting role"?
Was it on its face nearly obvious that "Hillary" only wanted to be President if "Bill" could be superior still and as now heralded as the first PRESIDENT OF THE WORLD - BILL CLINTON?
How can the ‘cozy’ with propped up dictators and other also less than ‘democratic’ leaders be explained - but that Clintons were ‘in’ and ‘down’ and ‘jiggy’ with themselves thought ‘inevitable’ to years in excess of our norms and contravening of our Constitutional ways of moderation and checks and balances first?
But for Saddam Hussein we wouldn’t have now about America a new TEA PARTY effecting?
And yet President Barack Obama isn’t a TEA PARTIER.
How do we like Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as still yet "BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR"?
But for Saddam Hussein and the Clintons’ eight years of mostly "inaction" and "avoidance" more "propped up" dictators would have been more THE NORM.
Again it was reading Alan Hart’s writing that I personally learned of the Ba’athist Party as "conceived" to a establishment of a United Arab Socialist State. And, how "some" would "pervert" it to their own personal power grapping and controling aims.
So what have we missed with "Hillary" not to an inferior by intent as PRESIDENT HILLARY CLINTON in a new world with "Bill" as PRESIDENT OF THE WORLD BILL CLINTON?
On its face we weren’t really to expect that a married life so long dedicated and consumated would be able to just "change" with an affectation/taking of a new title, right? It was too late for Hillary to stop being Hillary?
How wouldn’t "Hillary" have been a "propped up dictator" herself if "inevitable" had meant "inevitable"?
Was it even fair that she had all the pomp and circumstance that most dictators enjoy during all the long and usually more trying days she was of "campaigning"? Was it even fair that a full Secret Service detail and its assets so afforded a term limited President could be so tasked?
And yet President Barack Obama isn’t a TEA PARTIER.
Nobel Peace Prize recipient President Barack Hussein Obama did though make a good point with his "acceptance speech" for such when of a warning to "dangers" globally from "inaction" and "avoidance."
How did "THE INEVITABLE" not add up?
Was it merely Iraq and Saddam Hussein she couldn’t well shake? Was it the math of the Clintons’ years? Was it the dangers that became real from eight years of Clintons’ "two-fer" "inaction" and "avoidance" and domestic "have your cake and eat it too jolliness"?
Depends on "is a peace dividend" as "isn’t rightfully ‘peace’ dividends"?
How do we like "Hillary" as BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR? Could she have been better to such as President?
So much for her insulting all the Egyptian people conveniently to herself and "Bill" on near the eve of last Clinton Global Initiative near "mandatory" meeting of otherwise world leaders with her LAST CHANCE FOR PEACE - pronouncement to the world. Maybe Hosni Mubarak liked it some but wouldn’t most Egyptians have taken some to much offense from such?
How does "Hillary" not add up?
Note: Best for now to leave alone all the Saddam plotting likely with old France and old Germany to a less American centric economic and ‘peace’ that was much in the air as near a "war" thought during much of the Clintons’ "two-fer" eight years mostly to current dangers with their regular "inaction" and "avoidance." Best now to leave alone the "war" thinking and maybe new "Euro-centric" that Saddam may have thought he could work to with an invasion of Kuwait and such that he would so then be able to keep it as his. Best now to leave so much alone and especially "war" thinking about Saddam’s assassination attempt of President Bush that maybe was already in his plans for a "re-elected" President Bush. Hillary is enough to worry about for now.
While mopping up the tavern one day – and sweeping it another…
Alighting riddles swarmed as a relevant aftertaste, and disolved away leaving just some thoughts.
What do you have to say for yourselves - today?
Was it "foreign"? Was it "domestic"?
It seemed like it could "add up" yet wasn’t apparently adding up?
Hmmm, are Speaker Boehner and Minority Leader Pelosi really of the same parish of Saint Peter’s?
There’s a conundrum.
Here’s a conundrum: A church cannot stand on tything alone if it forgot/forgets or avoided/avoids prudence and effort to protect profiting and proceeds of those in its faith/community?
A "sweepin’ economics" cannot stand on tything "contributions"/"investments" if the sum to be "tythed" is zero, right?
A "moppin’ up" for a more copacetic - to a regular re-socialization sufficient as a weekly and/or necessary as a daily, and to a better set/reset of faith with re-socialization a calling to sing and listen weekly/daily with strangers and friends, and loudly?
So how does all this of a "conundrum economics" realight to lessons of Governor Lowell Weicker, and then his Connecticut?
Surely a lesson for our times and yet a riddle for many that a "tythe" system/economics still collects zero if zero proceeds what they sold?
Re: Governor Lowell Weicker: Connecticut conundrum of old: It is not the "taxing" but the type of taxing and the times of such taxation?
A "tythe" of zero is zero, right?
Ah, but there is a riddle – If a politician pushes altruism and a free giving how hard is it for them to think that a encouragement to a "free working" will effect more proceeds from others on the motivation spirited about the supposedly few "working for free" as a "good example"?
Is Islam a better religion for a basic and copacetic "poverty" not a "poverty" to them? How hasn’t "news" years been about Egypt and its "poor" of its "poor" and for so long? "Poor" but not "untouchables"?
Yes, Governor Lowell Weicker was a thorn in many Washington sides, and once another "maverick" – Yes, but these days of our "sweepin’ up" style has us again wondering near: If not the taxing - then maybe just the method of taxation?
A system based on taxation or "tything" cannot be about a failure to encourage and protect individual proceeds and profits?
It is wrong to sell a "capitalist" as an "altruist" and short sighted?
Not the "man" - Governor Weicker - but the times for Connecticut?
Yes teh "man" - Governor Weicker - for he alone had best chance to change the method of taxation and with a new call to state about state’s fair duties and responsibilities?
Mop Mop - Sweep Sweep - we have been here before - yes we have been here before.
How do we afford a sanctuary for weekly and/or daily "re-socializing" with song and readings for strangers and friends alike?
How do we get about a better funding to a "re-socializing" anew and such that it can be self-supporting and supporting of capitalist selves?
A tythe of zero is zero, right? And, a morality to taxation cannot stand on a system busy much to ‘disincentive’ and incomes of nothing and especially while then so of to incomes of nothing for much "mopping" and "sweeping" with a conundrum thought reasonable that a taking from such of intellectual property is supposedly about helping enough make enough to cover the needed taxation?
How long can a system stand where "capitalism" and "for profit" motivation usurped and sold by others as "altruistic" example to be followed by others, and "not" recognized or compensated as "capitalism"?
It is not a conundrum to some but should be that "a tythe of zero is zero."
Hmmm? Governor Lowell Weicker of a "conundrum economic"?
Hmmm? Governors all now of a time and a conudrum such that their economics need a new type of taxation not "higher taxes"?
Governors all now of a time and a reasonable duty such to consider a remaking of state taxation systems and now maybe to a more county specific revenue basis? Your cities are not alone? Your towns have rights too? So much isn’t even your "state’s" business let alone the business of others across the United States of America and their Washington representatives?
Hmmm? Are there some whom Democrats have been of a telling of their story the wrong way and now such that too many had their "capitalism" sold as "altruism" or just not credited or acknowledged?
A taxation of zero come from zero - A tythe of zero is zero.
Hmmm? Morality to a "re-socialization" anew weekly/daily with loud singing and stomping and readings and such for strangers and friends alike? How much needed for such community "sanctuarys"? Can it be self sustaining or more nearly "within" just its community? Is Islam better at such - can we afford not to ask?
Re: Egypt: It is un-Diplomatic for us to be of a saying even nearly ‘that those many in Egypt living on or near 2-6 dollars a day’ are not living well and as well we shouldn’t say they are not living ‘holy’ lives, right?
Re: Clintons: It is wrong, and now more an obvious conundrum of the Clintons and Democrats, that they are still "popular" for so much that now many see or nearly see couldn’t really have been of their own doing or thinking/creating. It is wrong and hindering to our current economics that so many are still encouraged to look at Clintons as "the answer" again and now still as there "reset" failed to effect even similar results with them to similar efforts.
Hmmm? A tythe of zero is zero - and taxation ‘wrong for our times’ may be now less about ’higher taxes’ than the type and place of taxation. If the Clintons have shown it couldn’t have been them - then whom might it have been? Why haven’t you heard of them - even now maybe so?
Our federal taxation system can stand a while longer and should - yet so in such a time that our states all may be best to a new method of taxation and an avoidance of a pursuit just to "higher taxation"?
Hmmm? Can Speaker Boehner and Majority Leader Pelosi really be two peas of the same "re-socializing" parish of Saint Peter’s?
There’s a conundrum.
Here’s a conundrum?
Their rivalry is palpable - ‘mohatma’ Clinton and "mohatma" Obama.
MSNBC soon reporting about such ‘mohatma’ Clinton as news as "President of the World Clinton."
MSNBC still reporting as news ‘President Obama’ only ‘president’ of the United States of America yet maybe a ‘mohatma’ himself.
MSNBC still seeming not yet reporting that the ‘other’/'otherwise holder’/'otherwise holding’ Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton as "the ‘otherwise’ in an inseparable soul of the ‘Clinton two-fer’ and so only of "Hillary" as part of "Bill’s" ‘mohatma’.
I do hope American taxpayers are not paying the rents for the Clintons’ Global Initiative offices. Such is so much of "Bill" existing as a "non-state" actor.
President Obama a ‘mohatma’ Obama yet not a Muslim? Obama as Gandi?
Where is Clintons’ ashram? Where is Obamas’ "community"?
If ‘Obama’ is Gandi then therefore he is Muslim - is Muslim as well?
Enter Pakistan – Gandi then no longer Muslim - Gandi to a lesser ‘mohatma’?
It is a dangerous precedent that former President Bill Clinton is about setting with what we can hope isn’t just a ‘popularity purchasing’ or "brown bag politicing" for his ‘otherwise holder’ of his "two-fer" connected soul - Secretary of State Hillary. It is dangerous especially for it not in those receiving state’s interests or their "free press(es)" or state media interest’s that Americans be told that such ‘gifting’ and ‘generosity’ abroad by "Bill" is in their eyes not ‘good’ for Americans nor in our ‘best interests’.
If Obama is Gandi then he is Muslim? And… and… and…?
Where is Obamas’ "community" – how is their ashram?
MSNBC - is "President of the World William Jefferson Clinton" though a seeming ‘rogue’ and ‘non-state actor’ acting at all in the best interests of Americans? How dangerous is all this precendent setting ’gifting’ that could be ’reported’ as too close to "brown bag politicing" and specifically to a smoothing of ’waters’ for his wife first and President Obama at most ’second’?
Today’s news perspective has us/me wondering on the ‘how’ about Egypt having so many that have gotten by for so long, as now reported, without being ‘news’ to us for being of a ‘living’ for less than two dollars a day.
It isn’t in the interests of ’receiving’ countries or their media to ‘report’ to Americans that they think all ’Bill’s’ ‘gifting’ isn’t in our best interests, right?
In the movie GANDI you are shown Gandi telling his ‘community’ or followers that they are Hindu, Muslim, Christian and Jew and… and… and so seemingly of his ’mohatma’.
In the movie GANDI and near the end of his last hunger strike Gandi is of telling an Indian Hindu who admits that he "wants to kill Muslims because they killed his son (and family?)" after a careful moment of listening and consideration near that such Indian Hindu can get out of such a hell if he did as told by Gandi and found a young boy who has lost both his parents that is near the age of his lost boy and adopts him and raises him as his own and specifically with Gandi telling such that he had to find a young Muslim boy and so raise him proudly as his son and as a Muslim.
Please tell me, anyone, anyone who knows for sure, that Clintons’ Global Initiative is not actually getting by with rents paid for by taxpayer dollars and while principal ‘Bill’ so rogue and busy as a ‘non-state actor’.
President William Jefferson Clinton and his soul maybe a ‘mohatma’ with "Hillary" versus President Barack Hussein Obama and his soul maybe as well a ‘mohatma’ but with "Michelle"?
Where is their ‘ashram’ - where is their ‘community’?
How do so many in Egypt live so well on near two dollars a day?
Do any of our unionized federal workers know?
But then politicians run the risk of being ‘nothing’ in trying to be ‘everything’ - right?
Mr. President Obama, isn’t there something we can do?
Are we becoming late to our own party? What about Sudan? What about the DRC?
How can we proceed now with former President Clinton abroad as a "non-state actor" politicing quite partisanly and globally all the while basically so as a "non-state actor"? Is there time left to correct such a global spilling of camel milk an avoid the crying? Where have our standards gone?
Where is "Bill"? How can he be assumed to be a "state agent" so far and vastly while basically just a "non-state actor"? How dangerous is it for Americans to have a former President so galavanting "independent" yet "partisan" and "political" and us here stuck at home without a media coverage to inform and alert? How can we fight back the global assumptions by many that he is so there as an uncontested voice of America?
Where is "Bill"? Where have our "protections" gotten to?
He is still on our payroll – the misconceptions so then reasonable abroad, right? He even so wanted to be "compensated" about to a worth that he attempted a rent for "offices" in New York City that if granted would have had him in one year have equaled that paid out to all past presidents combined for their first years. As it is he settled for less but not by much.
So we are all in agreement - it is presumed?
So we are all in agreement that President Clinton got promoted out of the White House to higher duties, and more personally gratifying abroad - yet still oddly now so set as that of a "non-state actor."
Is it just President Obama and "Bill’s" wife that are making us late to our own party, or is it equally or more excessively "Bill"?
So we have to look elsewhere now to guard our freedoms.
So we have to look elsewhere as well to guard our "representation."
Welcome to the United Nations! Welcome to the new "more democratic" United Nations - SORRY, THE AMERICANS ARE LATE TO THEIR OWN PARTY?
With Egypt so assertive and the Sudan also on the move can we ignore the DRC? Can we ignore our "representation" in the United Nations?
Today’s United Nations e-news newsletter (yesterday’s news) was of a reporting on change in the Sudan and even a new agreement to "wealth sharing."
"The United Nations today hailed the announcement of the official results of South Sudan’s referendum…Both Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and the panel he appointed to monitor the referendum urged the sides to reach lasting post-referendum arrangements, building on the momentum generated by the successful holding of a vote that by 9 July will sever a third from what has until now been Africa’s largest country and is widely expected to lead to the creation of the UN’s 193rd member state."
"Such issues include border security, citizenship, wealth-sharing, frontier demarcation, and popular consultations in the states of South Kordofan and Blue Nile - and Abyei, an area straddling northern and southern Sudan, that was due to have voted in a separate but simultaneous referendum on which side it would join…."
"’Their work is not over,’ Mr. Ban’s Panel on the Referenda in Sudan said in a news release."
Where is "Bill"? Where is this "rogue"?
With "democracy" seeming to be breaking out - are we now looking to be late to our own party?
If the member states of the United Nations do themselves become more democratic the United Nations will become more "democratic" – Are we looking to be late to our own party?
"Bill’s" way may be good for him - but he isn’t representing us, now - is he?
"Bill" isn’t even maybe representing half of us?
And neither is "Hillary"?
And nor is President Obama though of an oath to all?
Have you asked yourself or another?
And, have you yet considered we will be late to our "own party" if democracy breaks out at the United Nations and us then not with fifty state ministers instead of one mere ambassador?
You will be assimilated - UNLESS…?
Mr. President Obama, isn’t there something you can do?
Should we move rapidly now at least to a more ‘democratic’ representation by six regional ministers with the "six regions" soon reasoned to and recognized?
You are the face in the mirror?
Are you proud of your "Gorish" "Global Warming" "GREEN" image?
Al Gore grew up and got schooled likely with funding from family plantation tabacco sales aided by addictive qualities and efforts further down the line — Al Gore grew up keeping on - people "addicted" - addicted to what his family was pushing? Did he really grow up without having been pulled off his childhood ‘youth’ tabacco sled name "SMOKE IT!"? Did he really grow up not "pulled off" soon enough? I wonder.
If you are finding this blog just recently you may not know that as per the "economy" I have been basically on strike with a political protest since day Senator Hillary Clinton announced her entrance into race for President. You as well may not be up to speed on my blogging mostly in 2006 as "uc" with regular commentary on newsbusters.org taking on all comers and establishments to argue for the surge and then much in regular reasoned defense of such.
In 2005 Mr. Putin was TIME magazine MAN OF THE YEAR if I recall correctly.
In 2006 I woke up in DC seven blocks from the Capitol to spirits bothering me with a "can we have a picture of you for our cover" and me waking faster than I wanted and with a near "no, you would have to tell the whole story and I am not near half done … but, but, yawn, yawn, but… and while by then walking around apartment half asleep… was to saying well if you can want to cover "uc" and can put a "mirror on your cover… I can and will work with your intents." I still have to consider they likely were until then thinking of doing a collage anyways.
I heard Secretary Clinton rebroadcast on a news show this evening and now am patiently waiting for the media to cover her hipocracy and "transference" attempt without needing to be coerced to such maintenance of journalistic standards.
You deserve to be the face in the mirror?
Secretary of State Clinton using line and feathering such a line of mine used against her with enough truth and history that it has been sticking to her like tar is ripe for a media circus to a "gone carney" about her and her latest "transference" and "politicing" selfishly with a Diplomatic see/charge.
Secretary of State Clinton using a line near as >…candidates elected like seeming to a democratic purpose may actually be after a locking up a power to a lasting Autocratic "real power".
I have been years explaining the Clintons for their seeing their years as of an opportunity to grab near ‘autocratic’ global and domestic power that would humble even "Presidential" powers and with an near unprosecutable "highjacking" of power with grabbing beyond establishments current checks and balances.
Now as well and around such we have President Obama as first 2012 candidate already to campaigning and us all to vigilance about "equal air time" standards and practicing for parties and candidates as writ and as well about former and very partisan and political still President Clinton on a Global stage and in global media as of domestic politicing on foreign airwaves that aren’t necessarily properly to a policing to fair and free elections and "equal air time."
You are the face in the "MIRROR" cover of 2006 TIME - MAN OF THE YEAR issue?
Did you too not get pulled away from a "SMOKE IT!" youth sled as a child, soon enough?
How do you feel about your "Gorish" "Global Warming Alarm" "Green" visage?
So Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is of selfish politicing with her defensive "projection" with "transference" with like > get elected but then to a highjacking of power to Autocratic control.
So former President Bill Clinton of the CLINTON GLOBAL INITIATIVE is of saying his efforts with such are non-partisan and not political and yet then to interviews at such and before it is yet over and while guests are still their as invited to a "non-partisan" and "non-political" was to specific partisan and political and quite personal "hits".
It is not my way to go head to head with Secretary Clinton for such an abnoxious performance that is inappropriate with her own history and ambition - head to head on such comment as per Diplomacy and whether President Obama should fire her.
It is still my way of my strike to avoiding and economy stimulating and now to look for more ways people wouldn’t be wise to attempt to grow economy as long as she is so of such a "corruption" to our systems and foundations. Our media professionals not themselves to such a history of stimulating economy are more of a professional duty and charge upon such hipocracy showing anew on "Hillary" really near as sticky as tar.
Yes, I just get to sit back and reaffirm my protest and share with others how unwise it would be to help her further "highjack" our domestic and global systems and politics and economics to her decades old hopes to being, with "Bill", to such a ‘real power’ in a time unsuspecting that they would be virtually (usage?) to a Autocracy of Clintons.
If you see a "journalist" please share my concerns and a new "necessary" reaffirmation to my years in protest and in striking so where I have to work to figure out how not to stimulate the economy, and for a "greater good" and "necessary" checking and defense of American ways.
NOTE: Yes you may save on energy costs if your roof was a lighter color — yet now with most of America this side of the Mississippi covered with shinny and reflective white snows Global Warming may already have saved us more than we could have in a decade so from "global warming." The snow where it hasn’t collapsed your roofs may have helped insulate your homes and businesses and also been to a lowering of energy costs while there and that on top of the savings for it supposedly being warmer already.
*Yes, I have been saying since 1982-82 that I am more a "citizen Rosebud" that a CITIZEN KANE and have since been to thinking about improvements and stimuli and/to positive change for all. I take offense at Clintons’, and now Obama’s attempts to work such to just benefits to one party and one ideology. And, yes when Senator Obama was in primary with Senator Clinton it was before he started to gain that I asserted "officially" that the Clintons were not of an "authority" or "right" to use my material and especially because it was being again used selfishly more to a "highjacking" towards a seeming desired end of an Autocracy of Clintons and as of an "global" plotting and initiative.
**Happy Birthday President Reagan. Happy 100th. America is barely still here - the Clintons nearly got away with it but/yet not in a way that would have made us safer.
***2011 diddy: ASK NOT WHAT YOUR PRESIDENT CAN DO FOR YOU - ASK RATHER WHAT YOU CAN DO IN AND FOR YOUR COUNTY. (YES "COUNTY" NOT "COUNTRY")
***2012 ALARMISM: HAVE YOU ASKED YOURSELF OR OTHERS, AND ENOUGH, AND REGULARLY HOW A CONSTITUTIONAL "POWER TO REGULATE…" AS BECOME INTERPRETABLE AS "LAW" AS A "DUTY TO OPERATE"?
Please don’t forget to look in the mirror. "those who don’t know history are doomed to repeat it" like and well this is really much about the Clintons not really "knowing" their own history or times.
ALL HAIL - KINGS OF THE CONSTITUTION - ALL HAIL…
WE HEAR YOU EGYPTIANS — WE THE PEOPLE OF AMERICA HEAR YOU?
OUR GOVERNMENT MAY NOT "HEAR YOU" BUT WE HEAR YOU?
YES IF IRAQI PEOPLE SEIZED THOSE DAYS TO REFORM THEMSELVES AND TO A THINKING AND DEMOCRACY WORKED TO "BETTER THAN AMERICA’S" THEN WHY CAN’T YOU BE EXPECTED TO TRY TO DO BETTER THAN THE IRAQI PEOPLE MAY HAVE - AND SO TO AN ALSO "MAYBE BETTER THAN AMERICA’S CONSTITUTION."
OUR GOVERNMENT MAY NOT WANT TO "HEAR YOU" BUT WE HEAR YOU?
YOU WANT TO STAND UP THE WAY THE IRAQI MAJORITIES GOT TO AND STILL GET TO?
YOU WANT TO STAND UP A NEW EGYPT AS THEY WERE FREE TO FIND A NEW WAY JUST FOR IRAQ AND WITH A NEW CONSTITUTION?
WHAT IS FAIR IS FAIR — AND HECK PRESIDENT BUSH SHOWED US AND YOU THAT AT LEAST REPUBLICANS ARE NOT THE NEOCOLONIALIST "OCCUPIERS" THE MORE SO CURRENT SET OF DEMOCRATS ARE AND SEEM WANT TO BE?
ALL HAIL!!! ALL HAIL KINGS OF THEIR OWN CONSTITUTIONS!!!
WHAT HAPPENS WHENCE PEOPLES OF THE WORLD MORE SO STOP SEEING THE UNITED STATES AS OCCUPIERS OR NEOCOLONIALISTS – WHAT HAPPENS NOT WITH "AMERICA IS STILL THE LIBERATOR" IT USED TO BE?
WHAT NOW THAT BECAUSE "AMERICA THE LIBERATOR" HAS RETURNED BUT THAT WE NOW TO A NEW "ALL HAIL…" WHERE AMERICA NOT NEEDED EN MASSE OR FORCE, PRESENT, FOR OTHERS TO NOW TRY TO COMPETE WITH THE NEW IRAQ?
Left - Right - Left - Right - Left…
On February 6, 2011 President Ronald Reagan will turn one hundred years old.
Today is Groundhog Day and something is stirring somehow in Egypt.
How spirited Mr. Ja Ja Binks was dramatized - really still to a "fighter" for the "Gipper"?
Literally, a fight for freedom is about, such that a win by U.S.S.R unaffected by President Reagan, and his times, may have left to a "less peaceful"?
Literally "peaceful fights" and "less peaceful fights" - today seen.
Ja Ja Binks is quite a Gungga Din.
Today’s Egyptians seem well past "jousting at windmills" Quixotic.
Have you read of the municipal concerns about Mr. Binks of Hezabad?
Will President Reagan’s "half-life" be near as long or longer than Rudyard Kipling’s and his Gunga Din and MUNICIPAL? Could Reagan have been "Reagan" without Rudyard Kipling - was he a fan?
On February 6, 2011 Ronald Reagan former head of the Screen Actors Guild will turn one hundred years old. Boy did he have "chemistry" with the People.
This seems writ more to a staccato than a "rhyme" and maybe an appropriate "poetry" for today.
Stop and smell your surroundings?
No one is working in Egypt? How is their "municipal" today?
Reagan was a man that could write - and likely one that read Kipling.
Ha - ha - ha — so telling.
So President Ronald Reagan wasn’t as much to "jousting at windmills" as likely "suggested" and aired with protestations less than civily?
How are they on Martin Luther and "buying of forgiveness"?
Today is Groundhog Day and how is your MUNICIPAL - how is Egypt’s "municipal"?
Sean Hannity — You seem out of tune - you seem too much to a Dem Washingtonism that "a shinning city on a hill" is towards a mass socializing around DC as a "singular" great City alone on the "hill" of life on Earth.
Sean Hannity — You get Mr. Binks and MUNICIPAL?
Sean Hannity — Ja Ja Binks really is quite a Gunga Din, yes?
Sean Hannity — You are doing Reagan’s "life" a disservice more Cervantes by limiting the "Irish" in his poetic "a shinning city on a hill" as an inspiration to all municipalities as of them and for them and of their own "city" specifically.
Groundhogs — Surely I was not the only Irish American to see the common sense in such erudition by Reagan at least maybe of readings of Kipling? Surely I am not still alone and so still since late 80s considering to such and too poetic as a call whence upon a new world order to be of all cities more equally and equal?
Facebook friends and fans - and those others who have read my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM — And how? How? How? How can a Washington, today, in our new social media world, still of the post-Reagan Revolving, to a "new world order" now be but to a DC as a central district more "municipal" centric and less "state-dominated"?
Here-to-fore "socialist" like President Barack Obama - maybe but a "side-kick" to Clintons’ "two-fer" to "socialism" or "autocracy" reigning?
The Clintons still have us living in a world without the "windmills" they saw or didn’t see? Our’s and other’s "municipals" now endangered because?
We are moving fast now! We are moving fast now?
Reagan must have at least known of the movie "ON THE BEACH" if not also of an earlier knowing of Nevil’s book?
You elected the right people for your municipal safety and well being, yes?
What can we learn from "the nuclear holocaust"?
ON THE BEACH - with "Hillary"?
WARNING: You may want to reach for your Hans Kung.
Today is February 1, 2011 – do you know where your foreign policy is?
For Americans our United States of America Constitution was ordained "in Order to form a more perfect Union" and for "Posterity" and "in the Year of our Lord" using a Christian calender.
Seems it is an old wife’s tale that Asparagus turns urine green, but still it seems "scientific" that cockroaches might survive a nuclear bomb/holocaust.
Smoke can kill - and "insurance" is by definition a proposition only for "unknown" risks gambling, and so not an appropriate term for "pre-existing" conditions.
Smoke can kill - and well people should be free to smoke and still wonder if their smoking is actually helping them live longer than they would have if not to a use of "smoking" to moderate them at such moments. People who smoke though could be said to be of a "pre-existing" condition that would prohibit extraordinary measures to prolong life – such would be to a destroying of the "individual" and "soul" of such as one that smoked so knowing that "smoke kills"? Save the "soul" to measures that respect the individual and their life story of each of their character choices?
ON THE BEACH – where isn’t the "fallout"?
Time for romance? Time to make amends? Time to save souls?
DOOM AND GLOOM — The Clintons must be "RESET"? It wasn’t the Republicans - NOW WHAT?
ON THE BEACH — How did we get here? We are not alone?
Is this a "lesson" to warn from electing "officers" to our "offices" just because they wanted to become the first husband and wife separately elected to such a holding - and for the now more apparent likely - to predictable - corruption such an ambition effects so to two more of to a time of their making and selfishly instead of a more reasonable and humble of "officers" of a making by their times - still based in "reality"?
GAME CHANGE >> Yes this book is very misleading for its suggestion that "Hillary" only accidentally happened into a decision to run for president and so "romantically" as a "calling." Yes, I knew here ambition since early 70s and again by 1997 of hearing that people were already organizing during the Clintons’ administration to effecting to "line her up for a run." Really, there is nothing "romantic" or "patriotic" in "Hillary’s" told tale to run at Presidency.
ON THE BEACH — DOOM AND GLOOM — IS IT NOW TOO LATE?
Where did we go wrong?
How about the Clintons’ first moves on Middle East and Persian Gulf area of their first term where they were of an "asking" of region’s leaders to "just blame American Republicans" and to giving them a like clean slate?
How about the Clintons’ such move when really more blame was best put out that the U.S.S.R. and its expansionist policies towards a global spreading of communism more fundamentally at fault?
How about the Clintons’ suggesting that all the Cold War geopolitics that effected the Middle East were best to be blamed on American Republicans and not the enemy they were necessarily fighting to protect democracy and freedoms for all and from a global expansionist Soviet communism?
ON THE BEACH? Save your soul? Russia’s got religion, now?
On Russia now we have a consideration of Iran – a fair and stragegic consideration that though of a current helping to Iran that hardly now enough for any weaponizing from such not to a first and fixed targeting upon them and all past participants in U.S.S.R.? Iran for the Iraq and Iran war has U.S.S.R. to blame more than American Republicans and themselves though for willing associations of old?
Yes America, we should be able to rest easy or easier now finally that some of the hooliganisms of Clintons now outed and exposed — Yes America, we should now be able to rest easier with an Iran more logically to a blaming and targeting of once socialied nearer "Godless" Russia for having brought American Republicans to an ugly and undesired compromise with Saddam Hussein.
Surely a better way was available for Iran then?
Surely a better way is afoot for Iran now?
So but for "fault" still of Soviet Socialists with expansionist and agressive ambitions it otherwise really is now and still: ALL THE FAULT OF THE CLINTONS’ AND THEM NOT ONLY IN THEIR "EIGHT YEARS"?
Now — about the cockroaches?
ON THE BEACH — WITH "HILLARY"?
Today is February 1, 2011 - Do you know where you foreign policy was? Do you know where it is? America should now be able to rest easier and even to lasting romancing, at least that Russia and old Soviet states now more logically belonging in the "nuclear" sights of Iran?
And, so the "Muslim World" of Islam is a marvel of old for seeming the largest religion for peoples living about the hottest and driest and sandiest parts of the world on Earth?
If they had more beaches? A Brazil they might be and proudly?