1/11/2011

THE IRAQ CONSTITUTION - MERIT BADGES

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 10:23 am

XXV Section 4 >>>

     "Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.

     "Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office."

No I have not started such to suggest Vice President Joseph Biden is currently lining up the generals and admirals so "principals."

No I do not know if the new Iraq Constitution found these passages worth taking as their own.

These two paragraphs may be the longest sentences found in our Constitution, but I will have to check on that.

I do not even know yet if they took our First Amendment and its guarantees fully into theirs for theirs.  I do consider that the United States of America is best to consider that the Iraq Constitution was written and affirmed with thoughts that it had been created to be a better writ, at least a better writ for Iraq, than our Constitution could have been.

What a wonder. To bad President Obama still thinks helping Iraq majorities get out from under Saddam Hussein and to such freedoms and rights and to a prosecution by his peers for Saddam Hussein was not the right decision, if even a right decision made harder for it not having been made within the Clintons’ first administration.

Still remarkable the confusion across America whence the Pope was to statements about Operation Iraqi Freedom as statements meant as collective to just Catholics as Catholics not seeming called as Catholics to be responsible as Catholics to bringing justice to/for Muslims for other Muslims.  It might have helped if Pope had an "amendment" to explain to American Catholics that as Americans they may have state duties and precedence calling them more "neutrally" in a common fairness around jurisprudence in democracy.

Jefferson said something about swearing to an eternal hostility on God’s alter to all form of tyranny over men, right?

Have the Iraqi people stood up a "new and improved" formation in their Constitution?  Have their efforts pointed to "amendments" maybe wise for our own constituting as a People?

Few people know I faxed the Bush White House to suggest a name for Operation Iraqi Freedom before such name was picked to replace the first one that Muslims objected to on religious grounds.  I think it was "Tommy" Franks that threw me a strong salute from I have no idea where after I suggested such operation could be maybe titled OPERATION VALUE LIFE.

Mr. President and your executive principals, President pro tempore of the Senate and Speaker of the House of Representatives, "it is all the fault of Bush’s eight years" cannot be spoken without me taking it as an ignorant insult inconsistant with my knowledge and contributions over both Clinton and Bush years.

Oh, fellow media types:  Don’t forget the Time Square Bombing attempt suspect may have been in a Muslim tradition of to a restoration of "honor" among his family and friends after his slipping and so to a bombing attempt to help secure more paranoia in America to more U.S. dollars sent in fear to his friends and family so funded to chase enemies of America.  And, that such considered does help secure the idea that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is at least one "civil servant" not making us safer or within her swearing to our defense?  Is she a lone actor in such a politic practicing under guise of "diplomacy" such that we are not without some funding of our "enemies" in the war we are supposedly fighting against them on their own turf?

It is not a fair supposition that Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton by her approval by such Senate so tasked in duties and powers but with two votes of her peers is reasonably to a presumption that such "vote" was of the ‘removal’ of past faults so provided as a power of Congress for forgiveness of past acts or failings against We the People…?  Such confirmation was just a confirmation but where it may have been political expedience for ambitions of the other 99 of our nations most ambitious politicians whose ways she may more have been obstructing if not voted out of our Senate?

"Hillary is making us safer."  Still doesn’t seem to compute.