1/31/2011

“LAST CHANCE FOR PEACE!"???

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 7:25 am

Once upon a time on a day near the eve for President Clinton’s CLINTON GLOBAL INITIATIVE (mandatory) meeting for world leaders.

"Where’s the beef?"?

"Where’s your beef?"?

Dark forces, "dark" on both sides, both sides…

The faux "grit" of Clintons being covered again - shouldn’t talk of conflicts have ensued?

Too clunky in footsteps of Diplomacy to be a ballerina - Hillary conflicted and out of line.

It is her "Chicago way"?   She only thinks herself an "UNTOUCHABLE"?   While more of the "tradition" of movie mayor of such a writing on a business card for a hired killer like to a "get out of jail" pass with near "please extend the utmost curtesies to the holder of this card"?  At least she of such for having been raised to hit first and specifically "to hit the boys first."

The eve of last CLINTON GLOBAL INITIATIVE meeting is quite telling for its conflicts.

Then there is the forked tongued Clinton (Bill) of one breath saying his meeting and organizing was "not political" and not "partisan" and with the other breaths with him throwing "political" and "partisan" hits.

But what of "Hillary" is it now best to consider her, yes, of substantial "reading" yet maybe of poor comprehension or of having read too much of the wrong works?

She is our Secretary of State - not a private industry lawyer of "the client goes to jail - not the lawyer" and of expectation that each day is a new client and case so yesterday is just a former case not to be used to judge the personal character of the lawyer.   She is our Secretary of State and yet wants to be treated as a lawyer limited by the law with her "yesterday" and its contradictions not admissable for tomorrows judging and coverage of her. 

She wants to wake each day to a consideration "as best lawyer available for that day" and not a person with a consistant story more necessary for a "builder" or "poet."

Remember the eve of recent CLINTON GLOBAL INITIATIVE?   Remember Secretary of State Clinton’s declaration and such to LAST CHANCE FOR PEACE?  Remember it for a timing seeming of a clear conflict of interest for being so spouted to build interest and energy for the CGI (mandatory) meeting?

So Egypt?  So such "LAST CHANCE FOR PEACE!" was specific to last chance for Hosni Mubarak and for him to lock up thirty more years he could then pass on to his son?  Surely she wasn’t speaking so to condemn all other Egyptians and was just speaking of a window of opportunity as closing for herself and Bill and Mubarak and Son? 

Sure it may still be more telling and concerning that phonetically the Clintons first moves as holders of office of President were to an appointment of a WARRIN’ CHRIST O FOR as their main voice and man for Iraq and Egypt as well as Israel and Middle East.  Was it worse that they then were inciting, again phonetically, with their forcing MADAMS ALL BRIGHT?

Surely she must just have meant the LAST CHANCE FOR PEACE as for the selfish ambitions of herself and Bill to grab more Global "lime-light" for themselves.

So "conflicted" and yet hardly reported or covered how improper it was for "Hillary" to be intentionally pitching CGI with dramatic teasing to help "Bill" re-establish new relevance?

This "Queen" and her "King" have speech more fork tongued and corrupted - their poor diction, more intentional - stutterers they are not.

 Is it that they have read alot and alot that was "popular" and really for our times of having read too much of the wrong works?

Sure she wants to wake another day to more immunity as of a lawyer waking to a new case and new client and only to a working with existing law — Surely she hopes not to be judged for conflicts and contradictions over her past as of her real character and shortcomings - just please tomorrow an "immunity" as a lawyer not a prosecution one of the hands of a "player."

Yes, she is impeachable without an impeachment of the real one holding our office of President.

Her "LAST CHANCE FOR PEACE!" does now seem an unchecked condemnation of all Egyptians — ‘Oh but that was just an earlier case.’?

If as the "new" NBC was to "Obama late to this talk of democracy stuff" then the Clintons and their oppositions to foundations to such by Bush/Cheney may yet be to an arrival.

Again:  To an Amendment XXVIII as a new writ to ordain that no "lawyer" if elected to hold our office of President is to enter into such office and its oath taking without first voluntarily surrendering their ‘law licence’ and JD pf to a daily practice as high-lighted above - and so too for our members of any Cabinet - and only partly for otherwise they remain an "officer" of our Superior branch in Justice?

"Dark forces, "dark" on both sides, both sides of … — a tipping of the "hat" to Gandi and his story of beginnings as a dark skinned English barrister once on a train in South Africa, and while "current" on issues of Egypt today, some.

It still seems to have been so improper and unfitting for our Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton to have hyped her husbands annual (mandatory) meeting of their CLINTON GLOBAL INITIATIVE on the backs of all Egyptians and Israeli and others specific to "local" around such.

But then she wakes hoping each day to have a lawyer’s "immunity"? 

We are not to judge her "personally"?   We are not to judge her as a "person" just as a "lawyer"?

She has read so much it really isn’t her - it is just the limits of the laws she has to be ready to be on both sides of equally?

Where’s your beef?  The "Queen" and her fork-tongue speech?

Again:  Once upon a time - on the eve of the annual mandatory meeting of the CLINTONS’ GLOBAL INITIATIVE…

They want to be "royals"?   Egyptians want out from under her too?

THE UNTOUCHABLES?   An "untouchable" more of the Chicago Mayor passing out "GET OUT OF JAIL FREE" card to dramatized "hired gun" as also of THE UNTOUCHABLES movie?

We are only to judge her as a "lawyer" and yet that would have her also still an "officer" of our Superior branch in Justice and to another "conflict"? 

Surrender your law licence!  Or we will move to a disbarring for you too?  

 

1/30/2011

“SWEEPIN’ IT” ROMANTIC - “SEXY” PASSE’

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 12:20 pm

Thank you Speaker John Boehner and your Ohio for returning politics to our taverns and kitchen counters - civil.

Free at last we!  Free at last we!  Free at last we!

We are no Egypt – and new NBC of "Obama late to this ‘democracy’ stuff" nearly but oddly without a condemnation of his top Diplomat and foreign policy advisor for having him more "romantic" and current.

Yes, one of President Bill Clinton’s Davos messages was that he and Hillary are Neanderthals.  Quite fitting and remarkably honest in light of current administration having again gotten caught with their "pants down" on foreign affairs.

Thank you Speaker John Boehner for still "sweepin’ it" romantic.  Thank you Ohio, he is a fair representative - yes?

Free at last we!  Free at last we!  Free at last we!

But aren’t we now already sold to a change in America and Constitutional to an adjustment ourselves in administering reign as now it seems more romantic to have a "social media" revolution here to an amending of our office of president terms to two year terms with a maximum of eight years elected or otherwise of a holding of?

What can we learn from those fine Egyptian engaged citizens these days of responsible and concerned expression?

How can we "part the waters" here at home to better ways more "romantic" than "cheap" SEXY?

Yes "from Davos" former President Bill Clinton was most clear in all of his remarks seemingly with his announcement that he and Hillary are "Neanderthals."

Free at last we!  Free at last we!  Free at last we!

So we too don’t have to "part the waters" at home either for "change"?

We don’t have to "cut and run" from our age old ways either - but some ways?

Back to American politics - less "prohibition" to Middle East’s preferences to smoking and as well, now, less "proclamations" from "on high" by Washington for them and us.

For us an amending to more "socially responsive" politics with a celebration of spirit so to new "terms" for our own office of president?  Two years enough even for us?

Sure "Hillarycare I" and "II" and "Obamacare" are of systematic attempts at a partisan bureaucratic to lock in effective power to a centralized near dictatorial for America and so of such "charity" that the party promises such could become an entrenched elite outside the reach of "popular" "reset" by fair and open elections.

Sure to keep "Obamacare" would be to a stiffling of our democracy and nations designed spirit to self renewal.  "Obamacare" has no place in a loose federation as our confederate republic where national power meant more to necessary "undoing" of that which can be undone through representative politics, instead of an attempt to "do" for "everyone" and with a proposition that the People need it done for them "because they are not capable of doing it for themselves."

Free at last we!  Free at last we!  Free at last we!

Neither they nor we need to cut and run and hope apon hopes that "waters’" might part miraculously and timely.  This all seems more of a shift in winds than a need for a vast sea change, right?

"SEXY" passe’?  Will Egyptians beat Speaker Boehner to a new "romantic"?

Clintons already too long of a reign "SEXY" first and too much to a global about "AMERICAN INFIDELS."

On the Nile - the Clintons still in denial?  And also "late to this democracy stuff"?  Obamacare nothing but "Hillarycare III" and a furtherance to a democracy stiffling bureaucratic Washington too to a reign through promise of charity, less of "governance" for which ever party and its elite might if ever establish.

On the Nile - Are the engaged citizens of Egypt about a "republic" and as "republicans" - are they so and more so of Lincoln than Obama?

This is no time for America to usher in a "prohibition" of smoking in its foreign policies and Diplomacy and especially in the Middle East, right?

President Obama - you did quit smoking didn’t you?

Do remember your childhood and visits to your school by firemen and the public service messages though that smoke is bad for you and can kill you - you never should have needed the Surgeon General to remind you.

What’s on the menu America?   What’s on your menues Egypt?

Free at last we?  Free at last we?  Free at last we?

And for America too a revolution to shorter terms for our leaders and any entrenchment they could effect with promises to "doing for people" what "people can still be to a doing for themselves"?

Heck no to Obamacare!!!   Heck no to futher Clinton entrenching!!!

Heck no to futher Clinton entrenching especially domestically, and now especially abroad?

Can we get past Clintons’ "SEXY" and too Boehner’s "ROMANTIC"?

Egyptians?

1/29/2011

THE PROBLEM WITH SOCIAL MEDIA?

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 3:55 pm

I feel for you Egyptians so of just one ruler not term limited near on thirty years.

But really the real problem with social media today may be that because I didn’t see a post/alert to the exact time that Villanova was playing Georgetown today in college basketball I had set off feeling more relaxed than I should thinking my team didn’t need me.

But about the President and his plagarized remarks in Cairo a couple years ago:

"Plagarized" seems harsh? 

Well, what about his earlier part of his speech to the Muslim world for a new beginning of other orations more dominant about "all Bush’s fault"?

Well, what about his oration about not lying about not lying such that he was honest in a double lie admitting he had to and would maybe choose to lie?

Yes I gave this past speech an "F" and it must have been then the Berlin attempt at erudition that only garnered a "D-" for President Obama.

What you should have considered by now that the Cairo diatribe by President Obama was about as partisan a speech could be past our "waters’ edges."

What you should have considered with any speech that gets introduced by its orator with an spouting about "lies" and lying so conditionalized that it was delivered either as a Muslim "tipping of the proverbial hat" (joke) or as an intended lie that appeared to be a promise that America wouldn’t lie, and so though delivered as a double negative of ‘not lying’ about ‘not lying’ and so a needed "Muslim" truth telling.

Egyptians, though, I am wondering if you feel for me and because President Obama’s line about "America" doesn’t steal from it "people" is actually a plagarized rhyme and reason years mugged by Clintons during their eight years of triangulating to hold power on others works.

Yes President Obama and the Pelosi Congress did with their "cutting the corners" of our democracy fundamentals were to a willful and knowing attempt to steal just money as well.

It was probably mostly Americans that heard the Clintons, in troubled days, politically speaking, espouse a "need to get back to the center" and so much of a lesser knowing that near every time I heard such I tried to get to a proverbial bunker to keep them from "triangulating" about be to mug another solution to save their selfish political selves from their own ruinous tendencies. 

Yes I wish I could have relied upon the "social media" today as for a better sense of timing and support for my "home team" of my college - Villanova University.  Yes I wish I hadn’t turned on the TV and found game against Georgetown underway while thinking my attention and support was needed at a different time.

Yes, I still think President Obama deserves an "F" for his Cairo Speech and only partly for his audacity in thinking he had enough character and personal experience to so speak to the Muslim World as an expert in everything theirs. 

Hubris?

Only a limited few have read my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM or the letter to the editors of the New Haven Register from back near when "Barry" Obama was still unpublished and nearer a Harvard Law student, and its first black student head of their Law Review.

Yes, many at the New York Times likely could have reported such for "similarities" since Clintons were elected and maybe come to my defense every time the Clintons got in trouble with their own political instincts and needed to got to another triangulated mugging with another "we need to get back to the center" and even those years they left me to be a "food rep" in New England at times in Stop and Shops and IGAs checking NoNonsense and Trojan displays for dust and expiration dates.

Yes I was of coming up with such a thinking for America and the world for my own maybe more interesting and complex personal story than "Barry" Obama and for years as far back as early 70s when "Bill" and "Hillary" polled me about whether I as a near first grader thought they could both become president someday.  Basically my full answer was to a "no" but "Bill" wanted to get laid and lied to his future wife in front of me with an expectation that I even as a near man in just first grade would support his lying about my honest answer so that he could get laid.

WTF — "Win the Future"?

It is a "mad" thought that "Hillary" might have thought I might ever have been willing to work for her.  Certifiable quite!  Really sad how many times I may have heard her think such and yet while most of what they used and stole from me and at times with not too clever triangulation was developed to protect America and Americans and even others of our world from them and as much more a loyal and true Republican.  Just maddening that she could even think herself worthy of my helping her at all much past their first term - and so said with an attempt to be generous.

At this point I have to add to the complexity around "feminism" by mention a Metz that must have been equally confused to think herself worthy of her thinking "I had done it for her" when it really was my own story more complex and problem based to worked solutions that she was charitably added to and around my of years of holding thoughts of Clintons as someday useful as disposable politicians.  I did try to help Metz but that should have been seen as more business and of her of asking me to help her father and with "help my father" having in it a "global" help her father help save IBM or at least its marketing.  She is still better to be on my side and to a new an better understanding about such and to making a break from anything contaminated by Clintons.

See, she was a friend of my older sister and so of my already working in a feminism to help so many women with their issues of those years and so just go added much more in a concerned platonic to medical not medical way into a large grouping of women.  In no way was my politics and attempts at political solutions for those years only because of her - and especially for a study would show her ways have been tried again as very near Clintons and to the expected shortness of necessary thinking.

But now on the Cairo Speech and my offering to a "plagarism":

6-04-09 from Cairo University:

"America does not presume to know what is best for everyone, just as we would not presume to pick the outcome of a peaceful election.  But I do have an unyielding belief that all people yearn for certain things:  the ability to speak your mind and have a say in how you are governed; confidence in the rule of law and the equal administration of justice, government that is transparent and doesn’t steal from the people; the freedom to live as you choose.  These are not just American ideas; they are human rights.  And that is why we will support them everywhere."

Ok, there is a rythym and ryhme about some of these lines much more familiar to me than most, and from days before Larry King started talking about how great New Haven ice cream was.

Again, this was orated about President Obama disagreements with OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM and with a as well "domestic" proclamation that was very partisan with "all Bush’s fault."

Yes, while "Barry" Obama was still in Hawaii and likely still in High School I was of winning a science fair in New Haven in Middle School with team of two efforts about energy from hydro-electric power and also of taking a second place in Middle School’s Oratory Contest with FDR’s war declaring DAY OF INFAMY speech.

Yes, while "Barry" Obama was still quite nearly an unpublished Harvard Law Student and I still of a remembering of Clintons as to a someday usefulness as maybe disposable politicians I was of my "letter to the editors" of the New Haven Register of a ryhme and reason worked then seeming original and based on local and global concerns first about existing problems and then to a workable blending/solution in a better language usage.

Yes, Clintons’ rise was largely by some to much thinking by one dedicated to protecting others from the Clintons he knew and with them seeming useful against themselves for a better future for more, and more equally.

Yes, somehow it even got more confused but without the Clintons proving themselves to a "more worthy" than original and quite old "first impressions."

Yes, President Obama’s lines offering the near best merger of thinking to language for our times that was used with "America doesn’t steal from its people" proposition is actually the most lifted and plagarized poetry in his entire speech and so as I should know and recognize more than any other.

Though earlier in President Obama’s Cairo Speech at Cairo University he says too cleverly for my sensibilty:  "There must be a sustained effort to listen to each other; to learn from each other; to respect one another; and to seek common ground.  As the Holy Koran tells us:  ‘Be conscious of God and speak always the truth.’ That is what I will try to do today – to speak the truth as best I can, humbled by the task before us, and firm in my belief that the interests we share as human beings are far more powerful than the forces that drive us apart."  — The "not lie" about it "not a lie" as a double negative >>> Tell me that isn’t just "Muslim humor" - PLEASE!

And so these words them seeming original and needed were written and shared by me thinking I was offering a solution in a better usage of language and reasoning for my community and as well "poetically" so that other in our times might find it useful as well past divisive partisanship of our times.  Yes it was written to be "bi-partisan" or more "right of center" and was never written or meant to be obfuscated as a strickly Democrat and partisan "global" power grabbing initiative.

And so again, and as it was also to have crossed George Stephanopoulus’ desk in then Rep. Richard Gephardt’s office"

"Dear Congressman Gephardt,

I understand you are not running for President.  I hope it is not because you don’t think you are ready.  You did after all look more like the President when you gave the democratic response a while ago.  The fire was in your eyes and you had the presence.

New Haven, Connecticut is a city to watch.  There is a very subtle movement underway that might just set an example for all cities to follow…."

(and enclosed with such letter the "letter to editors" of New Haven Register dated June 8, 1991.):

"New Haven is a great city, with problems yes, but none that the culturally and diverse and talented peoples and businesses of the greater New Haven area can’t address and solve together.

Our biggest problem is that we have not learned how to work together.  The businesses and the voters of New Haven do not work as  a team.  We all need the same things:  A safer and more attractive city, more business and jobs, thus the chance to grow and become someone.  We all have a lot to learn and all need to become even smarter and more knowledgeable in order to turn New Haven into a premier city.  We have the raw talent, what we need is the leadership.

It is getting tiresome to listen to the candidates for mayor speaking of an either/or world, one in which the problems are seen in black and white simplicity.  There is a "new world order" emerging and what it amounts to is that if we, the people of the greater New Haven area, are to survive, let alone prosper in the world economy we hav to, out of economic necessity, resolve our differences.  We don’t have to like each other but we do have to learn to respect each other and our different backgrounds.  It is our great cultural diversity in New Haven that already makes the city great, regionally.

We can, however, no longer afford to just think regionally.  We now must compete globally.   To prepare for the improved competition we must get our city in order.  We need to discover and tap all the talent that is in New Haven, of any and every age, especially the kindergarteners.  After all it is their future as well as ours that we are trying to build.

To prepare for and adapt to the new world order we need the agility of youth, the ability to think freely and thus learn quickly.  Our age old ways may no longer be appropriate to the new world order.

The city of New Haven does need to become more attractive to prospective businesses as well as residents, shoppers, and tourists.  We must succeed in attracting more businesses, with their additional jobs, and also at the same time succeed in making the city a place people want to visit and spend their money.

What is seems we really need is a mayor who is characteristically a democrat, with concern for the people as foremost, and one who is also a republican with a focus on the interests of businesses.  This only sounds impossible because the term "democrat" now means th opposite of "republican" and vice versa.

It is no wonder then that campaigning has become negative when the democratic party and the republican party instead of worrying about the needs of the community, state and nation have instead focused on how to make themselves appear different and better than the other party.  It is about time that they realize the voters want substance in their representation.  We know what we need, and we know what we want.  So candidates, if you want to succeed show us you know how to listen, and know how to lead.  In a Democracy we aim to elect the candidate who will best serve our needs."

*** J. P. Hogan - June 8th of 1991 ***

Mind you I have just reread portions of DREAMS OF MY FATHER and now share an observation of how different the Cairo speech was in writing style than his earlier work about his basis for law and politics — very remarkable how "different" such styles are.

I do note that my "comment" about "plagarism" was of a likely continued usage of a rhyme and reasoning cleverly used without a re-usage of the specific words.

I have felt jarred from usage by them so playing with offerings of "isms" as their own for many years now and all those as one of such a creation with origins of a making and wrought of a hope to protect many from such using it so though meant for others and specifically not meant for them.

Yes, I have said I tried to save the Democrats from themselve and think I made it clear that they forgot to acquire the rights to my intellectual property in a manor reasonable and proper for their selfish desires of usage.  Still seems "mad" they even "Hillary" would entertain a single thought that I could possibly have a willingness to work for or with her, and so all the way back to before the Monica Lewinsky story broke reasoning.

President Obama has noticeably changed his style!

I am not sure I have — but then my style has been for so many years to as many practical understandings of life in my time as our Founding Fathers like Washington - Jefferson - Adams had brought to their own choice of words for "We the People" and our Constitution reasoning in their own time.

Yes, I was to many styles to be united later in words as attempted in 1991 by trying to learn as many of practical skills as most of our Founding Father’s possessed and in favor of strickly judging the texts in my own times. 

1/28/2011

“FEDERALISM IS DEVOLVING!” — ECO… WHAT?

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 6:09 pm

At least President Obama hasn’t shut down the social media in America — How else might Egypt have avoided "American meddling in their internal affairs"?

His "Cairo moment" of a "new foundation" has crumbled and fallen, his promises to an America that wasn’t best to meddle seeming absent. I did give him a D- or an F for "failed" for such "speech to the Muslim world" oration. 

Where isn’t the vacuum, now?

President Obama was in such old speech so spouted in Cairo to a proclamation near: "American slaves got out of bondage peacefully and without violence."

President Obama came across in America to some with such speech as a denier of our own Civil War, and even the Buffalo Soldiers.

President Clinton and former First Lady Clinton would be better to be silent know on domestic and foreign "inheritances."

The only foundations that are now working well for President Obama are those that are not their own, mostly, and maybe only partly for the divergent dichotomies present in most of his as presented with by fundamentally opposed to an also present as good of the Clintons’ eight years.  Yes confusing that President Obama can front his policies and politics as other than quite opposite to the Clintons’ "surplus" and un-funding and under-fundings.

So Egypt?  And still with President Obama fresh on spouting in press conference with Chinese leader with "partisanship stops at the waters’ edge" and yet President Clinton very very partisan still and across most waters as an integrated cohort of Obama administration — WTF? What a confusing "way to future"! 

So this is about the Middle East and American "nation building" so it seems.  Boy did Robert Gibbs use "we" alot seeming to speak to what internal decisions Egypt should be to.

The legacy of the Clintons in the Middle East about "change" and freedoms is quite awful and quite bigoted against a specific religious sect - The Shia.  The politics and policies of Clintons now in the way of "Hillary" being "believable" are stark and sad as a recent part of America’s history in the Middle East.  Quite unthinkable their standing so pro-Sunni and pro-Ba’athist with a clear disregard to the majorities and Shia as such.  Have we ever before been so bigoted anywhere in the world against a peoples of a majority of a specific religious sect?

What a mess the "new foundation" so compromised by floats of Clintons much of spreading of contaminants and distressing.

All that is working for President Obama now seems to be the remaining hope and optimism Reaganesque to "a shinning city on a hill" sensibilities footed in federalism and our Constitution.

President Obama is restricted by his own tying of his own hands with his still shoveled opposition to OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM.

President Obama on freedom and rights for a state’s people - what?  But, he still is against such for the Shia of Iraq and seeming from his closeness with Clintons also of their official policies and opinion near "Iraqi Shia are incapable of governing themselves" – to again like >therefore America should stand with the available "strongman" for stability over improved rights or chance at better future nearer our "federalism."

I still believe "Federalism is devolving" was the symposium conclusion I heard then Senator Joseph Biden assert in New Haven back in 90s when I found a "open to public" THE EVOLUTION OR DEVOLUTION OF FEDERALISM event hosted by Yale Law students including his son. 

"Federalism is devolving" could be a good thing if it was spoken to a "corrupted" federalism reverting back to fundamental original basis.  That is not how I seem to remember Senator Biden concluding.

What worked in 90s wasn’t a charm and wit of Clintons so much as a continued march to a "shinning city on a hill" future by many who very much bought into Reagan and his common touch.

And now how often do we witness Democrats now just thinking they have to "act the part" with a presumption that such is all Reagan did and so miss how poorly cast for such performances some of them are, especially as for a portrayal in their own times?

So as with China so was spoken by President Obama "partisanship stops at the waters’ edge"!

So as with Davos so was spoken by President Clinton much "partisanship" taken way past many waters’ edges - and very very very partisanly!

Yes it has been a busy Friday – and yet this administration still seems without a consideration or understanding that the economics of the nineties was of our governance in our times and our economics of our times per free markets as "convergent" and towards a renewal around original federalism debating.

President Obama is now of efforts and a time to reverse spiriting once to "a shinning city on a hill" republican renewal and in a time that as well is proving inconvenient for governance and economics seeming on divergent yet evolutionary marches.

Evolutionary is the market of our time as driven by freedoms from technological advances/ingenuity and while our current Democrat set contaminating with their floating their own attempts to a "new foundation" and maybe stealing of credits, and yet while such Democrat set avoiding "perspective" especially about their own history.

Evolutionary is that our markets are of tech advances now available to aid freedom advancing and while our Democrat set still being shooted and poured more devolutionary to a distrust in Peoples proclaiming about their heralding way past waters’ edges in hard partisanship en masse to a need for an American strongman even for Americans and with way too much "centralization" to yes - socialism.

Yes, this is about troubles with "foundations" and maybe as confused as the "cementing" attempts by this odd lot of miss-matched and poorly cast cabal of Democrats.  I haven’t worked masonry in a while but did try to pay some literary tribute to masons and even with a literary use of "float" as to other trades with recent mention of rebuilt motorboat that had me just on trailer buying a new axle and the new hubs, wheels, leaf spring brackets and leaf springs and hitch and rollers and fenders and winch and licence plate holder and lights of my own hands in such with all welding and such but for the heavier welding for the spring mounts to axle.  And, yes the boat needed all new floor ribs and marine grade plywood floor and all the glass and epoxy and spray foam as well as then other more cosmetic parts of restoration.

Yes, today it could be said "Federalism is devolving" and because our current administration is seeming at attempts to fight the direction that evolutions in technology have been about for all and all more equally in our markets and economics.

  

 

1/27/2011

NO MAN’S LAND - AND ROGUE

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 10:39 pm

If you have been thinking that Sarah Palin is the quintessential "rogue" of our times - think again.

Today in Davos — so still presented unchecked and hardly challenged, another.

What has happened to America — What has happened to our politics and the media?

Can you think of one "critical" article of former President Bill Clinton as globe-trotting statesman?

Well, I cannot, and do doubt that you can.

It was charming how he wrapped up his political and partisan cohorting with a touch of science — but please it better for us to be remembering "every action has an equal and opposite reaction" as per each of former President Bill Clinton’s words.

He is neither here nor there yet both there and here and publicly partisan and seeming a willing "officer" of an administration and yet more of "on a cloud" of a new frontier.

In America that is "POLITICS" and loudly so as of a standard defining.

So, where is the critical pressing to measure and consider how each word he speaks or nods to calls our media and journalists supposedly to a considering of possible "opposite reactions" from such spouting?

Cover still though like a harmless hapless hand of an administration and quite an "officer" — and yet quite independent and rogue on a new and old and ancient frontier.

One didn’t have to hear all of former President Clinton’s spouting to here him here and there and yet not there or here in a fixed legality with check of media critiquing.

The media has been absent from an expected duty and dangerously so.

How alone is it a "danger" that the funding from Clinton Global Initiative is based more on the "untraceable" banking transactions common to Muslim world of banking without records on an established ‘honor’ system of one’s word?  How dangerous is it as a "rogue" technique to limit oversight that such a paperless "commitment" network allowed to operate without full Congressional oversight?

The Davos "rogue" is the quintessential "ROGUE" of our times, and quite neither here nor there on a new, old and ancient frontier long of checks and balances and media scrutiny and safety checks with media criticism for public consideration and feedback.

So we have a seeming establish agent of our country and our Constitution left unchecked on world stage acting as "in" and "out" and very partisan.

Dangerous?  

Simply, "undermining" to our fundamental principles?

Science is of laws about "every action has an equal and opposite reaction."

And how many are now compromised for of a silence about being taken as acceptance, at least?

I don’t recommend trying to hear his Davos remarks except to listen to such for dangers of him seeming neither here nor there and yet here and there and a little detached while still also acting selfishly and politically and very partisan.

His economics hardly make sense – and show today for more that even in his years what did work was less of his and his administrations hands or minds.

SPUTTERED TO SPUTNIK

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 12:18 am

Again, it has been near two years and two months since President Elect Obama was basically allowed to profess a "Sputnik" "moment" with unparalleled kindness in transitional cooperation and assistance/training.

Why did it take so long?  Do we really need until 2035?

Oh, yes, my facebook friends are right to remember that I did win a Science Fair in seventh or eight grade.   Yes it was an ‘energy’ project demonstrating hydroelectric power using a water wheel to power a plastered town with battery powered lights in small homes below a scenic water fall constructed to feed the river and then be returned to resevoir.  Yes it was a project that needed team work for its size.

Oh, yes, my facebook friends are right if they also are remembering in seventh grade that I won second place in school oratory contest with a recitation of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s DAY OF INFAMY speech.  Truth is though, I did consider that I didn’t want my oration of a declaration to go wider to "city-wide" but may have been psyched by first place winner, maybe to such a moderation.

How do we now explain the near two years and two months without an earlier "Sputnik" moment?  — They tried "hugging" and "gifts" but…?

How do we now explain such so long after gifting a "RESET" as "overcharged"?

Yes, the town was plastered.  Yes the town was plastered over ply-wood and chicken wire, with powder grass and plastic trees.  Yes it took team work.

Mr. President, have you ever used a power tool?

I ask for as a general contractor for years and years earlier around college as of finish and rough carpentry I was in a green industry concerned with professionalism in R-values and efficiencies even in lighting.  Yet most so as per efficient light bulbs with the skateboard, snowboard and wakeboard stores around DC area those years of ASYLUM - Wake Skate Snow business.

Well Stephen Colbert is about to start.  Yes in High School I did letter in two sport and co-captain in both swimming and tennis.

Do we have the "green" meter up yet to measure danger and prioritizing to properly pace the present GLOBAL WARMING CRISIS so that 2035 or bust can be accomplished?  How bad is it - how great a danger of "end of world is here" per environment exists per your current science?  Is it safe even to create a green job still?

Oh, do you all like my new facebook profile picture choice of how I parked on Capitol Hill under the second floor windows of my old Eastern Market apartment, so with one of the boats I rebuilt on a trailer I also had to rebuild?  Such is a 1971 Glastron V196 Gulf Cruiser bowrider with a 1987 Johnson VRO 70hp outboard which I also took apart and rebuilt before having to sell it to afford the independence still for my blogging to thwart the Clintons from a return to the White House.  You should see the 25 foot sailboat I restored from even worse condition to even better and "race ready" yacht-like ship shape for an built in 1968 hull, that I also sold at an even greater loss.

Boy, oh boy, just remembering my old boat projects keeps me motivated against the Clintons, and now some more guilty by association.

Hello classmates from East Rock Community School, of days before Oprah ever knew about our school.  Is that classmate an once oratory competitor that took first on of my already found old classmates on new social media? 

contact:  facebook.com/jpeterhogan

Mr. President you couldn’t have saved us from another great depression without President Bush and his "president’s men" and their unprecedented cooperation and assistance/training, right?

Gosh I hope I got my spelling correct - have to check tomorrow, maybe.

1/26/2011

THE CHOSEN ONE

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 3:47 pm

He nearly got away with it.

Yet in the year of our Lord 2011 on January 26,  President Bill Clinton got outed by the loyalist rag the New York Times - long a protectorate press for his willy nilly ways.

They didn’t have to finally print the findings about the financial mess born from his infidel ways with a creation and coveting of a new game in "derivatives" — they could have found it news unfit to print.

But alas the great and mighty President William Jefferson Clinton got outed today.

But alas the New York Times had no choice but to finally announce such crises born of President Clinton with "derivatives" his baby.

Left out of such a partial and brief disclosure though is the "how?" and "why?" about infidel President Clinton of asking banks to try to "gamble away" the risks inherent and expected to predicted with a pursuit of a housing bubble economy he was seeking.  Left out was the other option that President Clinton and his "president’s men" could have instead balanced the "social welfare" of sought "housing bubble" machinations with the usual balance of federal spending for jobs.

He nearly got away with it — well, well, not really.

"He couldn’t help himself!"???  —  "It just in his ‘nature’ to play fast and loose!"???

Now what?  Now what that time has been wasted blaming the wrong President and "president’s men"?  Now what that "guilt" for financial mess more of the character and policies and politics specific to infidel President Clinton?

The wise economic policy for such a pursuit to a housing bubble with a vast relaxing of banking prudence there to fore common would have been to stay satisfied with a "balanced budget" pursuit and away from the unnecessary race to surplus popularity.

The wiser economic policy is still that President Clinton and his "president’s men" should have not taken another trillion out of federal spending for saving and creating jobs then in to effect out over the next decade or so, and, so assured that all those he wanted to commit into risky loans had a chance of having jobs to pay for such, and as a segment of the economy that historically needed federal or more local government spending to jobs creating.

He nearly got away with it — what now though that wrong president has been blamed for so long for that inherited from another and such another’s specific "playing" with prudence and general practice standards?

President Clinton was all about the "popularity" and maybe too focused on winning enough with trickery to buy "Hillary" the return to the White House he wanted.

Has President Obama been knowingly misleading the world about such?

Has "Hillary" been complicit in a cover-up with so much silence - so much silence around an actual knowing and participation?

What now to do — What now to do about Former President Bill Clinton as an extra-Constitutional globe trotting politician for his own power and fame?  What of the apparent conflicts allowed on an assumption of innocence about such with Clinton Global Initiative, and, CGI and State Department near rogue actors?

Our Constitution suggests such endeavor falls under a perview for our Congress and such that our Congress duty bound to approve near all contributions by foreigners and foreign officers and more specifically gifts from "Kings and Princes."

He nearly got away with it — that request that banks try to gamble away the expected risks from the housing bubble economics he wanted to push and push to there to fore "unworthy" that in all times past called for spending not "surplus" chasing to afford jobs for those targeted by President Clinton and his "president’s men."

So we have all largely been blaming the wrong eight years and wrong "leadership" and "inheritance" — What now?  Is the Clinton Global Initiative an unconstitutional construct, or just so barely "legal" it really should be considered "illegal"?  Is there really a loop-hole for past presidents to consider themselves "promoted" out from and above the office of the president?  This is how he is "living his dream" isn’t it?  And, again, with Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton the primary/sole government agent responsible for labeling his activities as "in support of terror" or "not."

And, now, really about the Middle East >>> how has such misplaced blaming and the Democrats GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM crisis to necessary change so been a jobs killer abroad and specifically in oil rich Middle East?   How many jobs have these Democrats accidentally or purposefully removed from the people of the Middle East?  At what cost to global peace and stability?

And, now while still with so many silent and "knowing" about such a State of Union Speech towards a speedier politic of policies to kill off more jobs in oil rich Middle East?  At what cost to global peace and stability will such a rush to "green" be?

Well, maybe he didn’t "nearly get away with it" — maybe there was no place for Bill and Hillary Clinton to hide or hide their "president’s men"?

A "derivative" to Clintons was a way to game the system and while knowing it like to destabilize economics for years to come and with a thinking that their "popularity" gained could hide any later guilt from the "how and why" so wrought.

A "derivative" to Clintons was a way to cheat the fundamentals and move a risky social program forward without having to do or sell the unpopular federal funding that there to fore had always been needed around such thinking to create and save jobs.  They tried to essentially "have their cake and eat it to."

He/she nearly got away with it — but hardly since their "surplus" of taking out an unecessary extra trillion past the trillion suddenly removed to "balanced budget" was more like a political "doubling down" than a measured and reasoned calculated amount – it like was a trillion too much and just pulled out of thin political air.

So is Bill Clinton and his seeking to be like a global "chosen one" actually not protected in the laws of our state and its prudence to Posterity of so many guarantees and checks?  

And, how rediculous is it that such can exist with a spouse a seated Secretary of State. 

And, how odd that it can exist without being blasted as a CIA "front" or a "shadow" government.

And, how during President Bush administration was former President Clinton maybe to a unwarranted meddling in world affairs and harmful to progress of "governance" by the law of those eight years of Bush administration where Clintons together still working it locally and globally towards a securing of a return to their White House?

By what standards have we been led so astray?

By whose?  Really?

THE WHO? & THE WHOM INSULTED

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 12:07 am

So we learned that President Obama would like us to think of all teachers in America as federal agents in "nation building" answerable most to him.

So we learned he was willing to hint at how he had hoped he could have effected change more efficiently by edict and compliant state run media.

So we learned he has trouble with salmon.

Who was this cameleon?  What happened to "…we can believe in."?

Quite troubling again that another speech by President Obama offered insults to other nations and in ways one might expect a good Secretary of State to have caught and provided edits.  What was he thinking speaking of general compassion in our nation as something that "sets us apart" from other nations and seemingly completely?

Speech needed an apology to President Bush administration.

Dangerous this proposition that our teachers, all our teachers, should be now thought of as "nation builders" and so as federal agents answerable first to our President and his/her Department of Education.

What besides the seeming insult to near all other nations might now be made of speech by them and even the teachers as "nation builders" with us still embroiled in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iraq?

So we learned he has attempted to rewrite natural law.

So we learned as well he has trouble with salmon.

Hard to believe this isn’t a case of alien abduction — what have they done with our President — where is President B~~~ O~~~ of Constitutional Law professing?

President B~~~ O~~~?  About the salmon?  Have you just suggested we own no salmon in any waters?   Have you just suggested that any salmon ever to have been in fresh waters of our Department of Interior’s jurisdiction are now therefore forever the property of our state?  Have you suggested all salmon better of the "commerce" of Department of Commerce and therefore so forth that no salmon even found in fresh water are other than international property and fair game?  This seems yet further confusion fitting with your recent commentary so unexpected and near "alien" from you about "partisanship stops at the waters’ edge."

But yet that comment to all watching that an engine on a plane they are on might just fall off and they then would crash seemed about as off and yet so "alien" tonight.

But yet that talk of "security measures" for airplanes not assumed as to be needed if and when high speed rail maybe a reality seemed nonsensical — what planet are you living on and in which year?  High speed rail travel if effected may need as much and near identical security measures in America as travel by air for the opportunity to "spectacular" and "catastrophic" in "terror" domestic or by foreign agents and/or non-state actors – don’t you think?  And while wondering such why rush people places now that technology allows them to work near anywhere?

This must have been a case of alien abduction — Where has our President gone?   Who was this personage of too much change too quickly to be believable as anyone/anything maybe but a cameleon?

Responders seemed to have the law, science and math down more realistically and safeguarded.

Yes if high speed rail is to offer a "spectacular" and "catastophic" from terror it may need all the security of our travels by air, and, now in a time when those in America can attempt to enjoy and appreciate moving slower.

Wow, he really mentioned "nation builders" and as a desired ‘teachers as federal agents’ of a President and his/her Department of Education.

Wow, he really did have a Secretary of State to have kept him from opening remarks in a State of Union Speech that offered insults to most other nations with a proclamation near of America is only country with general compassion.

What have they done with our President?

1/25/2011

IN HIS OWN WORDS - REALLY

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 8:30 pm

It is nearly two years and two months that President Barack Obama has been our chief administrator - especially if you include the months of "transition" where Bush admin worked with them in an unprecedented manor for our times.

Are we now to a tomorrow where the "remarks" given in "response" and tonight scheduled so for two of opposition to President Obama to "more downloads" to private media for later repeated listening?

That said: In the words of Barack Hussein Obama, and in no particular order: His words, some, picked now from DREAMS OF MY FATHER (2nd ed.):

p.163 > "Both Marty and Smalls knew that in politics, like religion, power lay in certainty — and that one man’s certainty threatened another’s."

     "I realized then, standing in an empty McDonalds parking lot in the South Side of Chicago, that I was a heretic.  Or worse — for even a heretic must believe in something, if nothing more than the truth of his own doubt."

p.143 > "’Excuse me, mister,’ he shouted. ‘Do you know why sometimes the river runs that way and then sometimes runs this way?’"

     "…The answer seemed to satisfy the boy, and he went back to his mother.  As I watched the two of them disappear into dusk, I realized I had never noticed which way the river ran."

     "A week later, I loaded up my car and drove to Chicago."

p.140 > "Every path to change was well trodden, every strategy exhausted.  And with each defeat, even those with the best of intentions could end up further and further removed from the struggles of those they purported to serve."

p.139-40 > "Through a tall window, sunlight streamed down on a bust of Dr. King."

     "’I like it,’ the director said after looking over my resume.  ‘Particularly the corporate experience.  That’s the real business of a civil rights organization these days.  Protests and pickets won’t cut it anymore.  To get the job done, we’ve got to forge links between business, government and the inner city.’"

     "On the spot he offered me the job, which involved organizing conferences on drugs, unemployment, housing.  Facilitating dialogue, he called it.  I declined his generous offer, deciding I needed a job closer to the streets.  I spent three months working for a Ralph Nader offshoot up in Harlem, trying to convince the minority students at City College about the importance of recycling.  Then a week passing out flyers for an assemblyman’s race in Brooklyn — the candidate lost and I never did get paid."

     "In six months I was broke, unemployed, eating soup from a can.  In search of some inspiration, I went to hear Kwame Toure, formerly Stokely Carmichael of SNCC and Black Power fame, speak at Columbia.  At the entrance to the auditorium, two women, one black, one Asian, were selling Marxist literature and arguing with each other about Trotsky’s place in history." … "At the end of his remarks, a thin young woman with glasses asked if such a program was practical given the state of African economies and the immediate needs facing black Americans.  Toure cut her off midsentence.  ‘It’s only the brainwashing that you’ve received that makes it impractical, sister,’ he said. … The woman remained standing for several minutes while she was upbraided for her bourgeois attitudes.  People began to file out.  Outside the auditorium, the two Marxists were now shouting at the top of their lungs."

     "Stalinist pig!"

     "Reformist bitch!"

p.134-5 > "…I saw the African-American community becoming more than just the place you’d been born or the house where you’d been raised. … –I believed that it might, over time, admit the uniqueness of my own life."

     "That was my idea of organizing.  It was a promise of redemption."

p.133 > "In 1983, I decided to become a community organizer."

     "There wasn’t much detail to the idea; I didn’t know anyone making a living that way.  When classmates in college asked me just what it was that a community organizer did, I couldn’t answer them directly.  Instead, I’d pronounce on the need for change.  Change in the White House, where Reagan and his minions were carrying on their dirty deeds.  Change in the Congress, compliant and corrupt.  Change in the mood of the country, manic and self-absorbed.  Change won’t come from the top, I would say.  Change will come from a mobilized grass roots."

     "That’s what I will do, I’ll organize black folks.  At the grass roots.  For change."

p.125 > "It wasn’t your father’s fault that he left, you know.  I divorced him."

p.122 > "Unwilling to make that choice, I spent a year walking from one end of Manhattan to the other.  Like a tourist, I watched the range of human possibility on display, trying to trace out my future in the lives of the people I saw, looking for some opening through which I could reenter."

p.123 > {Barry’s sister on finding him in NYC after first year:} "’Barry’s okay, isn’t he?  I mean, I hope he doesn’t lose his cool and become one of those freaks you see on the streets around here."

p.115 > "Where did I belong?" … "What I needed was a community, I realized, a community that cut deeper than the common despair that black friends and I shared when reading the latest crime statistics, or the high fives I might exchange on a (Hawaii) basketball court.  A place where I could put down stakes and test my commitments."

p.100 > "To avoid being mistaken for a sellout, I chose my friends carefully.  The more politically active black (Oxidental) students.  The foreign students.  The Chicanos.  The Marxist professors and structural feminists and punk rock performance poets.  We smoked cigarettes and wore leather jackets."

p.98 > "Anyway, most of the other black students at Oxy didn’t seem all that worried about compromise.  There were enough of us on campus to constitute a tribe, and when it came to hanging out many of us chose to function like a tribe, staying close together, traveling in packs."

p.82 > "We were in goddammed Hawaii.  We said what we pleased, ate where we pleased; we sat at the proverbial front of the bus.  None of our white friends, guys like Jeff or Scott from the basketball team, treated us any differently than they treated each other.  They loved us, and we loved them back.  Shit, seemed like half of ‘em wanted to be black themselves — or at least Doctor J."

**** ONE HOUR TO 2011 STATE OF UNION SPEECH!!! ****

PLEASE GO SHOPPING? - BAMBOOZLED?

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 11:43 am

We are hardly into the "post Rahm Emanuel White House"!

>How about a game of Tic Tac Toe?

Are we past the "Obama as Ferris" and Rahm as "allegory" nuclear?

>Time to "go shopping"?

Pittsburgh is nearly Ohio’s third team!

>Boy, for a carpenter I did buy alot at Potomac Steel 3-12 years ago.

Pittsburgh is an "allegory" for what and/or of whom?

>Yikes, to a spin doctor it seemed a rebellion against "green"!

"Woody" and his Jets seem to have shown up out spent and out spun.

>Yowie, I had to turn it off after the first half.

And the "cave" of Rahm allegorical as "High Priest" or "Obama’s new Wright"?

>Beat on technicalities again?

And the "cave" of Rahm allegorical and contraindicative to "austerity"?

>Rahm can’t do "austere"?

Shouldn’t we be certain - shouldn’t we know?

>And who is Obama’s most reverend and ministerial "Wizard" or even "High Priest"?

The "Come Back Kid"?

>Sorry Mr. President saith Sec. Clinton - Bill and I own that one - here?

Time to go shopping — Please go shopping?

>Sorry Mr. President - you already were so saith "Emanuel" like and less than allegorical "nuclear" in a un-economical and un-bipartisan "owning" way about that too loudly and too demonstratively - politically speaking.

Bribery — Political wheeling and dealing - Mr. President?

>But you already spent more than we had/have and have no "money" to offer Republicans, right?

Rahm will be missed?

>Or your first non-monetary "offering" towards a new "bipartisanship"?

An offering of "justice" since you have no money to offer?

>The Administration of "NO!"?

An offering of Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton?

>A "RESET" for of the People with Government of laws and not government of men - a prelude to a disolution of the Clinton Global Initiative as a unregulated MONOPOLY extra-Constitutional and too "government of men" than a balanced American way around establish laws with democratic checks and balances?

We are hardly into the post "Rahm Emanuel White House"!

>How about more of "Obama as Ferris" and some Tic Tac Toe?

How about an "offering" of "Hillary" since you don’t have money to offer to buy your forgiveness? 

>To a new "RESET" with praise for path suggested by McCain/Palin still seeming the better eco path for our government and economics so spread opposing your way and to a renewal in TEA PARTY like state’s rights and responsibility and greater individuality?

How about that SHELLACKING?  How about that SHELLACKING?

>Seems since you have no money to offer an apology to Bush is alos necessary.

 

1/23/2011

PIRATE! PIRATE! PIRATE! - SUNDAY PRESSER

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 11:09 am

Our President has an opportunity to do the right thing.

Damn the environment - full speed ahead with the economy!

Our President has an opportunity to do the right thing.

Damn the environment - Remeber Al Gore’s OSCAR?

We could make this about Chicago.

We can make it about Green Bay.

And, also relish the years of damage by steelers, still playing Ketchup to "GREEN."

Is Chicago "green" - and have they been an outstanding model to "GREEN"?

Is Green Bay actually a pride of a bay polluted so that it turned green?

Damn the environment - full speed ahead with the economy!

Our President has an opportunity to do the right thing.

How at risk are we as a People if we play "soft" against a President with an ignoring of concerns about a new precedence to encouraging our country to risk again an electing of one so inexperienced and junior in our national and global politic?

Would it be like Chicago letting their third string QB and line carry their banner today - and with a "confidence" appropriate to a first string/A team of years of stuggles and personal success?

We could make this about Chicago.

Damn the environment - full speed ahead with the economy!

Our President has an opportunity to do the right thing.

ALERT!!! <<< I HAVE SAVED THE PLANET >>>

ALERT!!! <<< I HAVE SAVED THE PLANET! >>>

ALERT!!! <<< I HAVE SAVED THE PLANET!! >>>

Really, Mr. President?  Really Mr. President - and China is onboard and saved too?

Damn the environment - full speed ahead with the economy?

Our President has an opportunity to do the right thing.

Mr. President?  So we of the People are now back to being responsible for themselves and now eating the less amount chided to and spending more responsibly and so green already that growing the economy still so carbon based won’t undo the little "progress" you can claim as the work of just Democrats in just two years?

Mr. President I am confused!  If we have save the planet enough to go back to growing our mostly carbon based economy then are we to believe that President Bush and Republicans had been "green" in their guidance and so green that you were able to use their progress in just two years to effect the necessary "save" of our planet?

We could make this about Chicago, but, if President about to focus on economy and budgets wouldn’t that be like knocking someone while they are already down?

Damn the environment - Remember Al Gore’s OSCAR?

And, how the day after Al Gore so celebrated "undiplomatically" about an in your face slam, seemingly from inadequate planning and consideration the "slammed" in China took offense and maybe "actions" such that their stock market did something crazy the day after?

Damn the environment - full speed ahead with the economy?

But how Mr. President - have you already saved the planet?

But how Mr. President - what about all those "bad" behaviors of American excess you chided and chided seemingly to disuade we of the People from such past "irresponsible" eating and spending and carbon consumption?

Isn’t it too early to claim "full speed ahead with the economy" unless President Bush actually is historical as of a good and timely "green" governance and you just to a "relabling" as "Democrat made"?

Did Chinese take great offense at arogance and poor "diplomacy" around Al Gore’s  AN INCONVENIENT TRUTH and his OSCAR and so to an actual effecting of a financial response with a market crash?

Could we pay off our debts to China with the amount thought lost from profits in economy due to pirating by Chinese?

Mayor Rudy - you almost made Dick Cheney look like a flaming liberal.

Go New York!  Go green Jets!  Your "Roth" isn’t what it used to be - Heinz home team less to relish and to be busy playing Ketchup while not "green" enough to cut the mustard?

1/21/2011

THE B TEAM - PLAN C {revised 1-22-11}

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 12:25 pm

Stepping in my foot steps to be of my old stealth media mogul past – Jeffery Immelt I have no reason or motivation to consider helping you.

I like the word "competition" but am now as concerned with its usage by Democrats as the word "is."

GE failed to bring some "good things" to light under you, and has been too partisan for my tastes.

It came as good news that NBC and other media and entertainment interests were being separated from GE.

I am not against helping Americans and people around the world to a new and improved economy but see now this would be the B team with a plan C when my plan A had been to have saved many of these Dems from themselves with less partisanship in 90s.  Alas time has proven it was pointless to have tried to save many or most of these Dems from themselves.

Yes, all these of FRIENDS, SIENFELD, LAW AND ORDER, ER, DIFFERENT STROKES, THIS OLD HOUSE, EXTREME MAKEOVER HOME EDITION, CSI, 24, GILMORE GIRLS, "POSITIVE CHANGE AT IBM IN 90s", THE STANLEY "SHORTCUTS" HANDSAW, MUCH OF MEDIA SHIFT TO A LESS RACIST/RACE BASED URBAN REPORTING, THE CLINTONS TO "ELECTABLE" IN 1992, and more have roots in my old efforts to encourage "positive change" and only partly to that mentioned "saving" Democrats from themselves.

Yes, my highschool swimteam co-tri-captains were "friends" encouraged after graduation to think of me as their "friend in NYC -even though I likely wouldn’t be there for years" and one a female Geller and the other the swimmer, David.  With me being J. Peter… also to man.

Democrats have given Republicans no reason to help them and no reason to trust them with so much generosity again as once too charitable with Clintons.  I do have problems with Republicans and for some of same period but don’t see them as too corrupt at the top to feel good about a bipartisan effort to encourage an "economy" theirs.

The selfish power reaching, grabbing and hogging by Clintons is too "corrupt" and "corrupting" for America.  Maybe without Clintons so close to Obama admin a little charity of bipartisan support could be tested again without so much "fool me once shame on you - fool me twice shame on me" in the air to warn against any further bipartisan support by Republicans to Democrats/Clintons.  The Clintons have abused almost all past charity so once parlayed with Republicans.

I will think about getting involved with FIRST TEE program towards a restoration of values and sport and sportsmanship around living and competition but helping you help a Democrat Admin is too rediculous to consider, so structured and cast.

Our Congress is writ to Constitutional Powers to impeach an officer of an Administration without also impeaching the Chief Executive of our office of the President.  I do hope the Republicans don’t avoid trying to address the "corruption" at the top of Democrat’s initiatives and staffing - I do hope I don’t lose motivation to help the other two parties.

The Clintons were never suspected to an assumption that my efforts were out there for their taking as their own and their own posterity, and nor did I think NBC would let them do so to one such a busy and successful muse of theirs.

Hi Comcast.

contact:  facebook.com/jpeterhogan

Query:  A incumbent President that announces their "campaign for reelection" before a State of the Union Speech is not then permitted to take political speech liberties with truths as "campaign" and "partisan" speech while tasked to duties and new promises around transparency and oaths for such a speech?

*{Revision:  No changes or edits needed for the above - some additional information as historical in past musings maybe be useful though.  While wondering if our "oath of office" of our office of the President calls such to being "representative" foremost and specifically above being a partisan ideologue to a different governance limited to "minority" support:  I still remember driving down Rockville Pike in Maryland in old 1988 Dodge B250 white cargo van during about a dozen or so years ago and thinking a 70’s show could help manage and entertain others in my circle that had more than one old van with a mattress built in and as well that in leaving law school the spring before Barry Obama started at Harvard a couple miles away I was of "school spirit" for only Villanova classmate left behind that wanted to become a JAG lawyer.  Also in all this would be EVERYONE LOVES RAYMOND as an ‘inspiration’ to keep more of my circle including family then living on Raymond Place networked in with my ambitions and with such a moment remembered while about Southern Connecticut State University campus in the midst of volunteering as New Haven Area Special Olympics Director of Support Services hoping to keep up moral and for years around such with thought that since I wanted to be like my maternal grandfather more than a bit remembering his early days as a sports writer in Boston so then maybe a show could be worked and to enclude earlier mentioned policing concerns with the real Officer Bill Barone then helping run cycling events.}   

1/20/2011

BLACK AND WHITE - AND READ ALL OVER

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 3:48 pm

Where is the media today?

Whence upon a ways, a ways with human rights a pitch point profered…

How prefered - how now pressed?

Are they keeping their local beat?  Are they ready for flash mob apps?

Are we better to the Russian’s offered – into six separate parts you will fall, like?

Are we better to beat our media more local and more regional to six separate regional issues for most once just national periodicals?

The costs, the costs of delivery and publication are down, right?

The costs are now low enough to publish regional issues more specific to each of maybe six, right?

But really is media covering their beats?  Even if read all over?

A Priest, a Rabbi and an Imam walk into a opium den in Pittsburgh.

Saddam Hussein had a way to beat the United States with media allowing him to be read all over and almost so but for a decentralizing in our urban areas that took away his chance to assert himself a better "leader" than Americans - like just look at their cities…?

If say Chief William Bratton hadn’t been to comstats earlier in Boston departments could he or another have been ready to turn around the conditions in the New York City transit dept?

Could Chief Nick Pastore have decentralized the New Haven Dept and ushered in "Community Policing"?

Could Deputy Dean Esserman have taken what he learned from one and brought it to another with just his law degree, or did he need the police academy training of New Haven Dept?

Sure Saddam Hussein had the sad state of our cities to support his desire to stay in power, but we got on such in time and with enough effect such that a fair prosecution of Saddam Hussein could have commenced within the Clintons’ first term, and with it then able to fit in the "read all over" messaging fitting with America’s attempt to save its own cities.

Where is the media today?  Are we now to a place where an encouraging of diversity and individuality a best path to greater readership and ad dollars?

Where is the media today?  Is it representing its local beat and encouraging new gen contributions in art and community?  Costs are lower - more detail and specifics should be more affordable not less, right?

Yes, it was effected so such that a OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM by another name, maybe, was an available proposition for years within the first term of Clintons. 

But alas such seemed too much to expect from Clintons.

So Madam Secretary of State Mrs. Willam Jefferson Clinton likely not to be reincarnated as a panda nor a zebra - one a fair "referee" and/or "officer" in their own time likely later only just to such a new life?

But alas, with march of beats to "Community Policing" and even "Liveable Cities" we were pressed and ready to entwine an earlier prosecution of Saddam Hussein and arrest the festering sense of "abandonment" spreading in Iraq. 

But alas, our entertainment was primed and tuned to such beat, but such was little known or considered.

Has anyone been known to have been reincarnated as a skunk?

How to keep the plot alive - how to keep the "equal justice" linked?

To Los Angeles?  To Washington DC?  THE DISTRICT worked it so.

The "New World Order" was afoot and moving fast, and Saddam seemed to think he had a way to monopolize to his own personal gain.

So too the "actors" in our politics - the Clintons - involved but sadly for much "inaction" and "avoidance" and efforts to new and better "walls of separation" to limit spread of "equal justice for all" then working to wider and stronger global basis.

The entertainment world was ready for a greater "seen all over" for more and more equally, yes, yes, for I should know - it was a preoccupation of mine to muse to make and keep it so.  So though, alas, the hoped for shortest and easiest concieved path for such wasn’t possible - the longer and harder road maybe the only one "reasonable" and not "too optimistic" while the "too optimistic" was thought "possible."

THE DISTRICT worked to such and like with a move to slower plan B or C.

Chief Ramsey and Deputy Gainer seemed fitting for new Mayor Williams attempts.  "Chief Ramsey" had an air of history about his name maybe necessary for a better "read all over" to such a hoped for "equal justice for all" beat.

Chief Dean Esserman, my old neighbor in New Haven, how goes Providence?

Commissioner Charles H. Ramsey how goes Philadelphia?

Sergeant at Arms of the Senate Terrance Gainer do you miss Chicago?

LAPD Charles Beck - I do mean to visit your city - no plans yet though.

Where is the media today?  Have they missed they were primed to cover an earlier prosecution of Saddam Hussein that could have fit with all the efforts to decentralize and improve our American cities?

Note:  Old, former, and, big fan of SPENCER FOR HIRE show.

contact: facebook.com/jpeterhogan

ps.  We could use the near "The US will fall apart into six separate regions - and to a new media model maybe with six separate e-issues of TOWN AND COUNTRY or MARIE CLAIRE and/or REDBOOK?

pps.  Six OPRAH magazines just for America’s regional dialects and interests?  And, how so in an America of a Hearst’s old first NYC media move of an acquisition of HOGAN’S ALLEY and later to that year of my graduation from Villanova University with a BA in Economics, an undeclared minor in Philosophy, twelve credits of Modern Standard Arabic, and three in Pascal programming, where graduation days near those of FBI announcing its new training facility to be named "HOGAN’S ALLEY"? 

ppps.  Yes I have always just been a citizen wondering what I could do for my country though at times more to a wondering about my own cities, and do remember "Sarge" Shriver from at least one Special Olympic event I was at for "training of coaches" and/or training for those volunteering as myself in games management.  His only words spoken to me were more spoken for me when he suggested to his wife that she move to stop blocking my view of the television.  I did spend years volunteering in New Haven and Ct games as a Director of Support Services (Operations) and with some time spent coaching a couple skaters towards their hopes in speed skating. I also spent time when with less time to volunteer with games in reduced commitments on team of evaluators, but not past 1994.

1/19/2011

WHERE’S YOUR BEEF?

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 5:23 pm

I know - I know - you all are waiting with baited breath to see if the United States of America wins the last battle of the Cold War.

I get it - I get it - you all are now preoccupied with CSPAN "live" coverage of House commentary before the "vote" maybe to signal the final end to the Cold War.

Clearly we are in Afghanistan now no longer as Bush administration was and now so no longer there in battles and struggles still of the Cold War.

Clearly we are past Operation Iraqi Freedom being an unfinished conflict "of" the Cold War and the collateral rendered around the Middle East.

I know - I get it - Afghanistan was once the Gettysburg of the Cold War.

I get it - I know it - Saddam Hussein did try to write a different end to the Cold War than the United States of America was designed to sit back and allow when of so much history of necessary entanglements of "war time" compromises.

But Mr. President?  "… at the waters’ edge" today of all days and as part of a state visit presser?

Is the HR 2 (? Health Care Law ?) vote to be about 5:30 pm today in our House of Representatives the last necessary battle still of the Cold War?

And today another "depends what the definition of is is" moment by a Democrat in office - our most executive office - whence President Barack Hussein Obama shot from the hip (unprepared?) with his comment near spoken as "I too believe partisanship stops at the waters’ edge."

Where is Justice Alito?  Where is Representative Wilson?  Where is Kenneth Starr?

Chime in Middle East?

Chime in especially if you remember or were more a direct witness to the start by Clintons in 1993 whence their "partisanship" had no borders when they asked leaders of the Middle East countries to please "just blame" the past "problems" on American Republicans.

A State "mulligan" Mr. President?

A "honeymoon" for a new "civility" Mr. President?

A "honeymoon" for you because you asked the other parties to be more civil and need time yourself?

I remember the Clintons’ early move to create a hard line for global partisanship, and have to think your appointment of Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton was towards furthering their efforts to make parts of the non United States states to "blue states" and "loyal" - to them.  I don’t remember "partisanship stopping at the waters’ edge" with the Clintons - though so said while remembering bipartisan efforts of Republicans pushed with generosity to bring Clintons’ into the global workability within some continuance of parts of Reagan Revolution.

Does the House of Representative vote tonight on "Obamacare" repeal, however titled and recorded, stand to be recorded as the last or near last battle of the Cold War struggles to thwart the spread of communism?  Of any "occassion" possible for such a declaration of "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED" no matter how late can there be one more poignant?

Mr. President you didn’t speak "seriously" with your use of  near "I too believe partisanship stops at the waters’ edge"?  You were jesting with your Republican Party memember now an Ambassador and possible opponent in 2012 presidential race?

Mr. President?  You of "all the fault of Bush’s eight years" were only jesting, right?

Mr. President?  You were only jesting, right — right since you do have maybe the most partisan and polarizing Secretary of State appointed in a long time?

I do remember the Clintons’ first moves in State "diplomacy" being of an asking of leaders of other sovereign states to near "please just blame the Republicans."

Sorry, seems a little late for a "do over" or "fifty - fifty."

Well, unless we turn to Samuel Richard "Sandy" Berger conundrum with a new "foundation" to "it must have been at least half the fault or more of Clintons" or at least their National Security Advisor so that Clintons again have another to "throw under the bus."

Hmmm, wasn’t it a British General Clinton who was still of fighting the Revolutionary War - against us - after an end was declared? 

Hmmm, wasn’t President William Jefferson Clinton born William Blythe III?

Hmmm, was the telling true that Hillary Rodham was raised to "hit the boys first"?

Hmmm, President on "partisanship" today - live - before the watching world?

Hmmm, wasn’t it yet another Clinton once Governor of New York that necesitated the writing of the FEDERALIST PAPERS so that his arguments against our ordaining a confederate republic could be overcome?

Hmmm?   What of such near "it is all the fault of the past eight years" and " it is all Bush’s fault"?

Yikes, there are more "other alternatives" that could have been tried before Obamacare than I can remember, and yet I remember Clintons’ start in Middle East being of "please just blame Republicans" and with such then a wedge used against leaders of Middle East during Clintons’ years with them "holding them on their honor" with a agreeing so once, thus maybe leaving Middle East honor bound not to "respond" until Clintons were no longer in office, and in office holding them to a near rediculous partisanship yet one still "promised" upon.

Yikes! 

1/18/2011

BREAD LINE MONITOR?

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 2:11 pm

Yes we can "create jobs" by ushering in a new centralized socialism.

Yes we could though still "decentralize" our priorities and encourage towns/cities and counties to a better "local" model for "global" competitiveness on a "playing field" where "reality show" status still possible in a moderated market based competitiveness in globality.

Yes we don’t need to appoint a national czar to build an army of "nationalized" "local" "bread line monitors" beholden to a distant Washington. 

There are likely more jobs and comaraderie and community renewal in taking a more Washington "hands off" approach even more so than a Washington "invisible hand" approach where "modesty" by Washington would be expected, and such to a GLOBAL "level field" where our towns/cities and counties would have to build better communities for business and specifically tourism and healthcare as our technological advances give them opportunities to do for their own region what Washington once was the only player in town about.

How has Washington so been to "solutions" that inhibit individuals and their regions and their dreaming to more competitive techno sav to better global play?

How can we so soon so walk all over the dedication and loss of our "Greatest Gen" and their’s and many others’ sacrifices towards thwarting the spread of communism and fascism?

Why cannot Washington try a "hands off" approach and let the individuals of the United States of America, and their communities, find their way, and be allowed to find a new way, as new "techno" offers new and great empowerment?

The way of the bread line monitor job offering?

This way to a Washington that after helping give Americans, all Americans, such new technology, and its empowerment, still to a "necessary" near "take back" and over-lording to limit new power in their zones?

Not!?

1/17/2011

OBAMA’S “APOLLO” STATE?

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 8:12 pm

So easy that a monkey could have done it – now do you get why I appointed First Lady Hillary Clinton to fly as Secretary of State?

Live on the Apollo - Live on the Apollo stage?

Really!  Job asked of "Hillary" so simple or "dangerous" that a monkey might have been the better choice, even now a couple years later so considering?

Surely it was undiplomatic to say "all the fault of Bush’s eight years" to a non-partisan "global diplomacy"?

Surely she was "damaged goods" not expected of much - surely a monkey with the same support of the rest of President Obama’s cast at State might have effected a better and more frugal rendition?

Live on the Apollo - Live on the Apollo stage?

Co-staring with Senator Harry Reid - co-staring with Senator Reid still fresh with his "light skinned with no Negro dialect" freshness like a battering ram to all in Port o Prince and near on the eve of maybe more devasting earthquake?

"Light skinned with no Negro dialect"?  But what of the less fortunate Senator Reid?  No hope for them?  No way from being mere "princes" in their own ports?

Live on the Apollo - Live from the Apollo stage?  Words matter especially when of "sentiment" real?

So easy a monkey could have done it and now a couple years later with it so that a monkey might have done it better and more frugally?  But still "light skinned with no Negro dialect" maybe more devastating to Haitians than their earthquake and so just days before?

What is "Bill’s" relevance - it can be said he hasn’t been right before any other since leaving office and so not right before any other while though expecting to be treated to a spotlight for "being right" and above others more right before him?

What was more devastating to those "princes of the world" born to dreams of greatness but with a discernable Negro dialect?

What of all those "princes of the world" born to dreams of greatness but with discernable Negro dialect?  Senator Reid?

Even if a monkey, with all the same support and ploughfery of President Barack Hussein Obama’s cast at State, couldn’t have actually have done near as well as "Hillary" shouldn’t we ask how well the monkey could have flown such?

Now certain we are - now certain we are that more frugally it could - more frugally and wise it could have been?

Live on the Apollo - Live from the Apollo stage? 

How many blacks has President Clinton "in Harlem" displaced from Harlem?

How many blacks can no longer afford "Bill’s" new Harlem - a gentrified hamlet?

Senator Reid - What of all those "princes of the world" born to a discernable Negro dialect, but with an asking remembering how "Bill" was happy to tell us there was two trillion available dollars in federal reach that didn’t need to be spent anywhere to keep us to a better "moral" - so?

President Barack Hussein Obama - Why didn’t you appoint a fellow "light skinned" or darker to Secretary of State post?

Sometimes a question or two just needs to be asked.

How many black has President Clinton driven out of Harlem?  

Senator Reid - do you happen to know?  Secretary Mrs. Clinton? 

STRETCHING THE DREAM

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 9:32 am

Gervais nailed it — Hollywood not to a "cease and desist" from sell "sex" and legal chemically altered states and soul full music.

Gervais nailed it — Hollywood not to be the great "center of debate" for our organs of democracy.

Gervais nailed it? — Hollywood just a little bitter that it to a lesser broadband rebellion to communism?

How about those 49ers?  A "Gold Rush" for Harbaugh?  49ers in 2012 - Go for the gold?

Good Morning San Francisco - I could see myself living there next year, in the next year(s).  You got that Quoit Tower to warn from Pisa original constructs, right?  And chocolate?  And bike paths?

Good Morning San Francisco - Oh what a dramatic entrance - what a sailors paradise - what a "gate."

To hear tales so told, now between fathers and sons to "future Hall of Famers" or "future presidents" so told telling so of our these times more a "level playing field" for all than heard whence the father was the son and his father a teller reading the "telltails"/"telltales" of the winds of his times.(add comas if you must - if you’ld rather be more "Thoreau")

Good Morning San Francisco - Yes, our NFL is now a much more level playing field for all, than once, and whence around more challenging dreams of others earlier.

To be a Knights Templar - to be a Knights Templar for Halloween in 2011?

Has a future president been born in New York?  Has a future president been born in San Fran?

A "modified" "Romney Plan" beat to existence in San Fran before Boston, right? 

Gervais nailed it?  Haight-Ashbury lives?  A Cable car name "Summer of Love"?

What were they smoking?

Article. III.

Section 1:  "The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress…"

{Keep reading - it gets better}

"…may from time to time ordain and establish.  The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour,…"

{Keep reading - it gets better}

"…and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which sahll not be deminished during their Continuance in Office."

{Keep reading - its gets better}

Section 3:  "Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.  No person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court."

{Keep reading}

     "The Congress shall have the Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attained."

Can any area of America be chanting "go green" now more that Haight-Ashbury – could the "Haight" allow such with its legacy?

Yes, our Country is now a "more level playing field." 

Knights Templar for Halloween?   Hmmm.  

San Fran did beat Boston to an existence in a better Romney Plan, right?

Got your new "more level" game on?

We don’t need the dreams of Marx - Martin Luther’s still good for us?

Martin Luther was a Jets fan?   Martin Luther King Jr. would be a Jets fan today?

A "team" is bigger than one’s self - a town is a team - your town is bigger than you - your town is your team?

Gervais nailed it? - "Adams is alive" — "Barney" reigns?  NFL have you got your ballet on - how is your metachlorine count - is the "Force" with you/your team?

Gervais nailed it - And Hollywood just a little bitter that it to a lesser broadband rebellion to socialism?

Martin Luther was a Jets fan?  Martin Luther King Jr. would be a Jets fan today?

A "team" is bigger than one’s self - a town is a team - your town is bigger than you - your town is your team?

Fly Martin Luther?  Mark you Marx, pinch your pennies, stay pound wise and away from "penny wise and pound foolish"?  Fly Martin Luther King Jr.?

1/14/2011

GREEN REBELLION - GREEN VELVET?

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 9:59 am

"When I wrote the following pages, or rather the bulk of them, I lived alone, in the woods, a mile from any neighbor, in a house which I had built myself, on the shore of Walden Pond, in Concord, Massachusetts, and earned my living by the labor of my hands only.   I lived there two years and two months.   At present I am a sojourner in civilized life again."*

What a loner!

I am not sure I have ever read much more than this of Henry David Thoreau, of his "Economy" or his "Walden."

*{Walden -"Civil Disobedience", Henry David Thoreau, Signet Classic, New American Library, Times Mirror, New York, c. 1960}

Would Democrats today, especially liberals of Massachusetts today, a lesser of the bulk of them at least, be of an opinion, today, about New England safety, and elitism, and community, to a shame, and a contraction, punctuated with emphasis, and constructions, with dramatic pause, respectful of a greater good, and good governance, and better demonstraness, demonstrated civily, and well permitted, but restrictive to a new "Walden"?

Langston Hughes once wrote.

Yet, how ugly, on a global scale, was Clintons’, and Massachusetts’ elite friends’, and accomplices’, and fellow officers’, of greater charge, and duty/duties, renditions, and mad marketing, and doctoring, in spin, and constructions, when once afoot, with UNIVERSAL, in UNIVERSAL COVERAGE, in Hillarycare I, of Dems’ overreaching, and stretching beyond our Constitution, and civility though guaranteed, and secured, humbly, and strongly, for all, within, by a usage to "popular" in domestic, naturally to a riling, and, demeaning, and disappointing, abroad?   How UGLY was there "disobedience" to our Constitution and American sense, and history, of calling something just for us so something for everyone, but NOT?  Depended it did on Universal not meaning "Universal"?

Yes, Langston Hughes did once write.

Yet, how ugly, and years later, was the GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM, of Massachusetts’ elite Al Gore, of Harvard University education, and reputation, for his putting polar bears, and their rights, above many, and many Shia, in Middle East, and those being beaten, by the Taliban, so reported, but again still, with a perpetuation that Clinton/Gore had been of due dilligence, and obedience to our Constitution, while pushing PEACE DIVIDENDS, of a PEACE that must not have been in their "reports"?

Daring is:  Daring of a Civil poet:  Daring of a Civil War Era poet: 

"A woman at auction,  She too is not only herself. . . .she is the teaming mother of mothers,  She is the bearer of them that shall grow and become mates to the mothers.

Her daughters or their daughters’ daughters . . who knows who shall mate with them?  Who knows through the centuries what heroes may come from them?"*

*{Walt Whitman, Selected Poems, a selected few lines, a few lines also of [I SING THE BODY ELECTRIC].  Some lines so from a Civil War Era poet.}

Yes, Langston Hughes used to write, and boy could he write.

Yet, daring is Walt Whitman "singing" the body "electric" with a mention of  a woman "at auction."

So essentially Al and Hillary just don’t write well?  They just don’t know how to balance selling with prudence and proper governance?

Yes, Langston Hughes could write - but yikes if they are now about "correcting" Twain what would they do to Hughes’ spelling and grammar?

What if Henry David Thoreau hadn’t had such a French name?  What if he had been born a "Charles David Loughner" or a "Shirley Adams Henry"?

"A woman at auction"  >>>  A mother of mothers - for sale or buying, or shopping French second hand art or furniture?   Daring, even for our times.

Man Up!  On Walden?  Now, to "Woman Up!"?

Whatcha doan?  U bld tht?   What’s velvet?  Y dn’t U du plumb or level?

>While walking down Newbury Street one day…

>Heavy with false patriots, typing away…

>{left foot - right foot - left foot - right foot///}

>Heavy for an America stood up to false science and poor planning to a "green."

>{left foot - right foot - left foot - right foot///}

>A pondering, a pondering — How did so many New England elite leave out the "morals"?   Go Green!  but no "bottom" to their cause - no go ‘green’ but only so far and so quickly and not as they did to a go ‘green’ but if you go so green that you become or already are a cave dwelling illiterate we will come and put you in our sights and shoot first?

>A pondering, a pondering — Yes Langston Hughes could write, could he though get published today?  —  Oh and the mass "immoral" in "Hillary’s" UNIVERSAL CARE as to a new American ugly elitism for all, and without them really asking for it so or such!

ECONOMY —  They must not have studied it?  They missed the "humanity"?

ECONOMY —  President Obama is a Massachusetts’ elite. . . .Pres B~~~ O~~~ meant to do WALDEN for all? —  Until he pronounces now with their "science" that they have saved the earth it is to an "immoral" and of an "irresponsible" to create or save a job?  —  A job means "work" and "work" means "energy" and "energy" means "heat" and "heat" still mostly comes from carbon consumption, and they these elites didn’t put a bottom on their rebellion/insurrection.  

ECONOMY — Their "priorities" are set and so to an assimilation to "save the earth first" - jobs? – So what?   Until they pronounce they have saved the earth we must wait and wait and wait to learn it is safe to "work" - to work "morally" again – can you imagine how guilty the "haves" must feel not being "morally" allowed to endear "work" for others as once more a welcomed "calling"?   At least the Dems took most of such "guilt" upon themselves for with a "taking" from the "haves" they too are to an "immoral" if to give to the have nots for "work" until such time as Dems’ "science" registers that "Dems have saved the Earth."

POLITICS — Those of such a poor planning and poor science may not be capable of a ‘two-thirds’ vote in both the Senate and our House of Representatives to a "removal" of such past "insurrection" or "rebellion" sworn against once?

CIVICS — What if Langston Hughes had been "Langston Hughes Thoreau"?

CIVICS — GO GREEN!  But check your science and moral, better?  Better than _________?

CIVICS — On Walden >>>  What to wear near public - in public? <<<

1/13/2011

JOHN PETER ZENGER REDUX?

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 9:08 am

Article XIV, Section 3:

     "No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State Legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.  But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability."

What’s love got to do with it?

If/When an elected President to more a divider than a uniter?

How to press on but reflective and conserving.

How to walk the whit?  How to "man up"?

Turn to a Civil War Poet?

To a Civil War Poet:

/

The bodies of men and women engirth me, and I engirth them,

They will not let me off nor I them till I go with them and respond to them and love them.

Was it dreamed whether those who corrupted their own live bodies could conceal themselves?

And whether those who defiled the living were as bad as they who defiled the dead?

The expression of the body of man or woman balks account,

The male is perfect and that of the female is perfect.

The expression of a wellmade man appears not only in his face,

It is in his limbs and joints also. . . .it is curiously in the joints of his hips and wrists,

It is in his walk . . the carriage of his neck . . the flex of his waist and knees. . . .dress does not hide him,

The strong sweet supple quality he has strikes through the cotton and flannel;

To see him pass conveys as much as the best poem . . perhaps more,

You linger to see his back and the back of his neck and shoulderside.

The sprawl and fulness of babes. . . .the bosoms and heads of women. . . .the folds of their dress. . . .their style as we pass in the street. . . .the contour of their shape downwards;

The swimmer naked in the swimmingbath . . seen as he swims through the salt transparent greenshine, or lies on his back and rolls silently with the heave of the water;

Framers bare-armed framing a house . . hoisting the beams in their places . . or using the mallet and mortising-chisel,

The bending forward and backward of rowers in rowboats. . . .the horseman in his saddle;

Girls and mothers and housekeepers in all their exquisite offices,

The group of laborers seated at noontime with their open dinner-kettles, and their wives waiting,

The female soothing a child. . . .the farmer’s daughter in the garden or cowyard,

The woodman rapidly swinging his axe in the woods. . . .the young fellow hoeing corn. . . .the sleighdriver guiding his six horses through the crowd,

The wrestle of wrestlers. . . .two apprentice boys, quite grown, lusty, goodnatured, nativeborn, out on the vacant lot at sun-down after work,

The coats vests and caps thrown down . . the embrace of love and resistance,

The upperhold and underhold – the hair rumpled over and blinding the eyes;

The march of firemen in their own costumes – the play of the masculine muscle through cleansetting trowsers and waistebands,

The slow return from the fire. . . .the pause when the bell strikes suddenly agian — the listening on the alert,

The natural perfect and varied attitudes. . . .the bent head, the curved neck, the counting;

Suchlike I love. . . .I loosen myself and pass freely. . . .and am at the mother’s breast with little child,

And swim with the swimmer, and wrestle with wrestlers, and march in line with the firemen, and pause and listen and count.*

 

*FROM: [I SING THE BODY ELECTRIC]  WALT WHITMAN, Selected Poems, Gramercy Books, c. 1992, pp 116-118.

/

We have November 2010 as instructive and civil - we have that a President that proves to have been more a divider than a uniter can be civily humbled by proper practice of civil expression - and to his first maybe "humble" speaking in an oration.

/

[I SING THE BODY ELECTRIC] is a much longer poem than first parts here quoted - it ends with:

"…

If life and the soul are sacred the human body is sacred;

And the glory and sweet of a man is the token of manhood untainted,

And in man or woman a clean strong firmfibred body is beautiful as the most beautiful face.

Have you seen the fool that corrupted his own live body?

     or the fool that corrupted her own live body?

For they  do not conceal themselves, and cannot conceal themselves.

Who degrades or defiles the living human body is cursed,

Who degrades or defiles the body of the dead is not more cursed."

/  

{I SING THE BODY ELECTRIC,  p 124 of poem from p 116-124}

1/12/2011

ARTICLES OF - ARTICLES OF - BABY STEPS?

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 11:08 am

Remembering November elections of 2010 and as a revolt against giant steps effected and attempted by lead Democrats and as more to a foward march of an ideology than a timely and clear "representation" of a nation as a whole, or just to a majority:

Article I - Section 9 - second paragraph…:

     "The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.

     No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

     No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or Enumeration herein before directed to be taken.

     No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State.

     No Preference shall be given by any Regulation of Commerce or Revenue to the Ports of one State over those of another: nor shall Vessels bound to, or from, one State, be obliged to enter, clear, or pay Duties in another.

     No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement of Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.

     No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State."

Remembering especially this last paragraph in Article I Section 9 how can we not ask or consider ourselves to such a proposition that a former President still "holds" an "Office" and well funded "expectation" of such to Posterity such that maybe all contributions to Clinton Global Initiative for it of an "active" even without the seeming "conflict" existing loud and present with Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton so "official" and "intimate"?

Remembering the Clintons are "lovable" for the "corruption" and how they swim this current daily in a keeping to paddled "loyalty" to Kennedy’s as American Royalty in "Camelot"?

Well?  You are remembering and considering it so, still, yes?

How much of "contributions" and pledges of "commitments" made to keep Clinton "two-fer" active post Presidency dip too deep into our Constitution purposes and protections prescribed towards a prudent prevention?

Again:  "The size of the attempted cover-up" can quite suggest to the size and scope of past crimes - High Crimes or Misdemeanors.

Again:  Thinking a Constitution cannot have a later "law" passed to contravene such, and maybe partly poorly parsed so in such a saying I still to thinking our Constitution needs and "Amending" or reconstituting for a inferior Congression Act of Legislation to trump or supercede or contravene.

Again:  The "foundation" of much of the past decade of problems and structural deficits were so formed within much of the Clinton "two-fer" jury rigging of a better system to fit their ideology more than a reasoned will of the majority in democracy.

And, more personally and still historical is such an understanding of Nixon and his "cover-up" that such was effected more as "damage control" for others, others mere citizens, than as an contravening to "cover-up" just for himself.  Mark Felt may have records to such effect - I really do wonder, and wonder all those years I stayed quiet about knowing his historical role while he stayed quiet.  I knew it had been a FBI operator of highest duties involved after Watergate more in "damage control" than in a "cover-up."  See, Nixon did have J. Edgar Hoover afraid to do duties for him that he had supposedly done willingly for earlier Democrat Exec Officers and of such reportedly of concern for their "liberal lawyers." (From a book on history of FBI.) Nixon had wanted the FBI to officially snoop upon Dem HQ for investigative not simply "political" purposes and then had to outsource some.  See I remember the "you messed up the investigation" - "it is on you" - no one else a mere citizen deserves to have their lives turned upside down and inside out and to an "especially" such about my father as "another mere citizen" deserving protections for his "American Dream."  Yes, I remember Mark Felt and him insisting on a nick-name and "quickly" that got him to a case duty with a offered "deep throat" monicure.  It was never really about what nation took it to be about - and so that what it was maybe about maybe enough to have kept Hillary from her pride in and with an "impeachment."

Bill, it wasn’t about B~~~ J~~~s but about political oppression and threats by a minor playing with family power that had close ties to Dem HQ, that needing a looking into for a proper and measured checking for greater or intentional malice, beyond a forgiveable act of a minor with big talk.

Bill, it was of a minor threatening as a hooked up Democrat "political ruin" to a neighbor but in a spirit of a wondering as to possible bullying future potential, and not expecting such to one as well hooked up with law and Republicans within a thought Democrat family. 

Bill, you are not a King.  Hillary you are not worthy of "Queen."

And so it was written and so it became and was effected until…?

 

1/11/2011

THE IRAQ CONSTITUTION - MERIT BADGES

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 10:23 am

XXV Section 4 >>>

     "Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.

     "Thereafter, when the President transmits to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives his written declaration that no inability exists, he shall resume the powers and duties of his office unless the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive department or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit within four days to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office."

No I have not started such to suggest Vice President Joseph Biden is currently lining up the generals and admirals so "principals."

No I do not know if the new Iraq Constitution found these passages worth taking as their own.

These two paragraphs may be the longest sentences found in our Constitution, but I will have to check on that.

I do not even know yet if they took our First Amendment and its guarantees fully into theirs for theirs.  I do consider that the United States of America is best to consider that the Iraq Constitution was written and affirmed with thoughts that it had been created to be a better writ, at least a better writ for Iraq, than our Constitution could have been.

What a wonder. To bad President Obama still thinks helping Iraq majorities get out from under Saddam Hussein and to such freedoms and rights and to a prosecution by his peers for Saddam Hussein was not the right decision, if even a right decision made harder for it not having been made within the Clintons’ first administration.

Still remarkable the confusion across America whence the Pope was to statements about Operation Iraqi Freedom as statements meant as collective to just Catholics as Catholics not seeming called as Catholics to be responsible as Catholics to bringing justice to/for Muslims for other Muslims.  It might have helped if Pope had an "amendment" to explain to American Catholics that as Americans they may have state duties and precedence calling them more "neutrally" in a common fairness around jurisprudence in democracy.

Jefferson said something about swearing to an eternal hostility on God’s alter to all form of tyranny over men, right?

Have the Iraqi people stood up a "new and improved" formation in their Constitution?  Have their efforts pointed to "amendments" maybe wise for our own constituting as a People?

Few people know I faxed the Bush White House to suggest a name for Operation Iraqi Freedom before such name was picked to replace the first one that Muslims objected to on religious grounds.  I think it was "Tommy" Franks that threw me a strong salute from I have no idea where after I suggested such operation could be maybe titled OPERATION VALUE LIFE.

Mr. President and your executive principals, President pro tempore of the Senate and Speaker of the House of Representatives, "it is all the fault of Bush’s eight years" cannot be spoken without me taking it as an ignorant insult inconsistant with my knowledge and contributions over both Clinton and Bush years.

Oh, fellow media types:  Don’t forget the Time Square Bombing attempt suspect may have been in a Muslim tradition of to a restoration of "honor" among his family and friends after his slipping and so to a bombing attempt to help secure more paranoia in America to more U.S. dollars sent in fear to his friends and family so funded to chase enemies of America.  And, that such considered does help secure the idea that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is at least one "civil servant" not making us safer or within her swearing to our defense?  Is she a lone actor in such a politic practicing under guise of "diplomacy" such that we are not without some funding of our "enemies" in the war we are supposedly fighting against them on their own turf?

It is not a fair supposition that Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton by her approval by such Senate so tasked in duties and powers but with two votes of her peers is reasonably to a presumption that such "vote" was of the ‘removal’ of past faults so provided as a power of Congress for forgiveness of past acts or failings against We the People…?  Such confirmation was just a confirmation but where it may have been political expedience for ambitions of the other 99 of our nations most ambitious politicians whose ways she may more have been obstructing if not voted out of our Senate?

"Hillary is making us safer."  Still doesn’t seem to compute.

1/10/2011

Amendment XXVIII

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 4:22 pm

Who is whose "Commander"?

A President of: of XXII with "No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.  But this Article shall not apply to any person holding the office of President when this Article was proposed by the Congress, and shall not prevent any person who may be holding the office of President, or acting as President, during the term within which this Article becomes operative from holding the office of President or acting as President during the remainder of such term."

A President of a Congress expected to have so much federal business such that:  "The Congress shall assemble at least once in a every year, and such Meeting shall be on…" showing up maybe as the only instructive sentence that shows up twice in such Article?

A President of "Commander in Chief of the …" and yet a Congress to a holding of right and duty in declaration to war?

Ready for XXVIII?

How to Order anew to a more perfect Union?

To an Order to Posterity for greater domestic Tranquility on regulations of commerce?

To greater domestic Tranquility to "professional limitations" to our office of the President and all spouses or "intimates" as relevant in respect to contracts of marriage and such "union" of souls and to a more perfect "holding"?

Again, in light of the times of the writing and ratifying of our XXII amending, it helps to consider that such eightieth Congress was a new Republican Congress of near as large and vast an electoral sweep as we have just recently witnessed.

Amendment XXVIII ???  A bar to lawyers being sworn in, if elected, as "lawyers"?  A natural professional conflict for our "Executive"?  A Order to a more perfect Union respectful to domestic Tranquility and Constitutional Posterity to a general Welfare so ordained to a wilful suspension of "status" as "lawyer" as an "officer of any court" or bar association so dedicated to profession code to being prepared as "lawyer" daily anew each day to be able to argue both sides of each issue equally?

Can a lawyer sworn in as a lawyer actually profession execute such duties of our office of the President and not have their "personality" and "character" open enough to be Commander in Chief and of "the buck stops here" presider to issues executive in pressing/denting we the People?

Amendment XXVIII ???  A lawyer if elected to our office of the President, and with any other "elected" to a co-holding in marrital "two-fer" to those times acknowledged of "intimate holdings" as another "acting as President" … shall willingly and wilfully surrender their law license until such time as they are no longer a holder of our Executive Office and to such time that a "review committee" can be convened to entertain a petition for new certification?  Such Article to be expected of any other to a co-holding of office as per full respect to marriage laws so naturally to an intimate ’holding’ and such as so many since Martha Washington as acted as President, wilfully? 

So our Constitution moved the conscript to a Congress meant to be so involved that it needed only issue it as ordained to meet at least once a year and even at such times as writs were issued and approved years later to just change the date upon which it must meet, that "once per year"?

Being a "lawyer" is just to great a different "responsibility" or "duty" than our office of the President that such seems now proven to be a deterent to clear and concise executive decision making.  Anyone?  Anyone also see it a conflict that a President as a "lawyer" distracted from listening more to the majorities and minorities for a sense of right and wrong or direction and to a "professional" standard/duty to rethink and rethink and lose time each day to being equally to both sides and maybe to no decision?

{I lost my first draft of this post this morning after clicking wrong icon before having "saved" – will think about such for edits to this less "dramatic" rewrite for tomorrow.}  

IN HIS OWN WORDS!

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 9:21 am

Remember the Howard Dean campaign? 

Remember the "yYAAAAAA" SCREAM?

When our doctors go bad and to a lower (political) standard what comes next?

Howard Dean M.D. is a Democrat from the "most white" state in America and arguably an admitted "socialist" - this is American, our "melting pot" so such "presented" as "fact" not "judgement."

However, it was in his own words after loosing such old campaign that he summed his loss up with a confession/an analysis that he had run afoul of the "mental health clarity act" — as a doctor who had been trained to know better.

Dumbing down political speak for political advantage does have risks, such is what he must have been admitting to having known that he should have ‘known better’ than to have done himself, time, and time, again, during such campaign.

As a doctor Howard Dean was expected to use his "education" to avoid "mid-term probation" in an academic metaphor and not to once or regularly "ignore" his "higher education" for personal political play and advantage.  At least, as interpreted, within "first do no harm."

When our doctors go bad and to a lower (political) standard what comes next? Professional review board? Public license revocation?

Yes, if President Obama were a "doctor" and not a lawyer "expected to argue both sides of each issue" and be "prepared to argue and defend both sides" he could be so accused now, professionally, as still Howard Dean and Dems persist.

I do not know what the American Bar Association "legal" and "professional ethics" may expect from politicians of their association, but do know it was Howard Dean M.D. in his own words after his defeat speaking lightly with a confession that "he had run afoul of the mental health clarity act." (remembered, not source quoted - so maybe paraphrased here by me.)

We had President Clinton to impeachment review and a few disbarring professional knock-downs and while prosecutor Ken Starr seems to have thought he had enough to also pursue First Lady Hillary Rodham Clinton, Esq. Was First Lady Clinton at least a willing accomplice?  Did her "insistance" to "official" West Wing "duties" open her up to more public scruting - judicial prosectution than "First Lady" office usually allows?  (hmmm — better check back and look for more detail on what it was Starr thought he could "get" "Hillary" on with his legal pen.)

Senator Kerry has spent years dumbing down issues in our foreign policy for partisan political advantage and no more maybe than with his "anti-war" revival cored with Iraq made into a one issue conflict.

Former Senator Al Gore has spent years dumbing down issues with faulty "science" and such to much fault in crashing our economy so that "housing bubble economy" of Clintons’ "dumbing" stumbled and secured an more damaging "down-turn."

When our doctors go bad and to a lower (political) standard what comes next?

Were 2008 elections our most "uniformed" deciding by us our People in our history as a young nation? 

Are many in main stream media now wondering how to mend themselves and clean their hands of such?

Were 2008 elections our most "uniformed" deciding by us our People in our history and because the Democrats were knowing and purposeful to a "dumbing down" for partisan political advantage that did harm first to our nation’s general mental health welfare?

Bush may have "lied" he may have had "general Welfare" in mind and "greater good" - I cannot say if he was "right" or "wrong"!

I can say that Democrats did "lie" more to work a "misunderstanding" across our elections for partisan political gain!

When lawyers play fast and loose and choose to "represent" only their partisan minority, while elected to lead "majority"?

Anyone?  A doctor?  A lawyer?  An ethics board?  A Congressional "committee"?

Democrats have been lying more - haven’t they? 

1/7/2011

EXTRADITION - FORM A COMMITTEE

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 1:34 pm

BY ORDER OF …

BY ORDER OF A ORIGINAL INTERPRETATION…

BY ORDER OF A MATCHING CURRENT INTERPRETATION…

SUNDAY SHOULD BE HARDEST FOR PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA!

OUR NEXT SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE IS NOW THE "HIGHEST" TO OUR ESTEEM AS A NATION WITH A BASIS AS A REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY IN SUCH CONFEDERATED REPUBLIC - BEST TEE - TIMES NOW GO TO NEW SPEAKER.

PER OUR CONSTITUTION PRESIDENT OBAMA IS NOW ‘ON PROBATION’ WITH THE AMERICAN PEOPLE.

PER OUR CONSTITUTION OUR CURRENT PRESIDENT WITH "BALANCING" OF MID-TERMS MUST BE TO TIME SPENT TO REMEDIAL STUDIES.

MID-TERMS HAVE PASSED AND WITH A CLEAR AND CERTAIN PRONOUNCEMENT.

MID-TERMS HAVE PASSED AND NOW OUR PRESIDENT, BY DESIGN, IS ‘ON PROBATION’ WITH WE THE PEOPLE.

SO IT SHOULD BE.  SO IT IS.  SO IT IS WISEST AND SAFEST TO BE.

SUCH A FAILURE SO MEASURED MAY POINT TO OUR SPEAKER NOT ABLE TO "JUSTIFY" TIME FOR GOLF AND SUCH HOGGED BEST TEE-TIMES OF CURRENT OBAMA LEGACY, BUT STILL SUCH NEW SPEAKER HAS BEEN PRONOUNCED "MORE IN TOUCH" SO OF LIKELY MORE TIME REASONABLE TO SUCH THAN OUR PRESIDENT NOW "ON PAROLE."

PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA NOW HAS HIS PLATE FULL JUST KEEPING UP WITH REP. RYAN AND SO THAT SUNDAYS IN STUDY MOST LIKELY NEEDED.

HOW MANY OTHER ‘PERKS’ OF OFFICE NOW FALL FIRST TO OUR NEXT SPEAKER?  ANYONE?

OH WELL, WHAT CAN YOU DO - WE ARE SUPPOSED TO BE A REPRESENTATIVE DEMOCRACY.

ALERT!!!  ALERT!!! ALERT!!!  >>> RICH LIBERALS OF CALIFORNIA AND OTHER STATES FOUND TRYING TO MOVE, AND MOVE AWAY FROM "PAYING THEIR PIPER" SO LONG CHAMPIONED SHOULD NOW BE EXTRADITABLE BACK. <<<

1/6/2011

AND THEN THERE WAS ONE

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 7:13 pm

Until today President Barack Hussein Obama had been the accepted titular head of two equal branches of our federal government.   Well, maybe more so than just "titular."

We have three "branches" (equal branches) in our Federal Government, some even read about such today.

Have you read your Constitution today — did you read along with Congress?

Did you hear the part with "in the year of our Lord" with us in a marking of our days with the Christian calender later "amended" some with our First Amendment?

I guess understanding what is written can be difficult at times.

Are you ready?  Have you readied yourself?  Have you steeled yourself for austerity issues?

Have the Clintons been most to this "failing" of 111th and President Barack Hussein Obama such that now our President may have been rendered near a "titular" head and of only one branch?

There is much history and precedence that our Congress to an equal right to determine the fix.

If it is now to "austerity" the Clintons might want to sneak away and hide — their eight years are going to get a long overdue "edit" in the public eye.  Have their plans backfired?

Are you ready for C.O.L.A. rollbacks and with efforts to lower the cost of living while accepting newly permissible effectings in valuations and revaluations once unthinkable?

Not much we can do about just National Security imperatives nor that President Clinton use to whine that President Bush had "left him a war."  Not much that we can do now that the less expensive options for Afghanistan and Iraq passed with the "avoidance" and "inaction" of the eight years of Clintons.

Lucky these past two years didn’t see those in Washington as politicians and bureaucrats of governance unchecked by a state media - a media controlled by them.

How much are the eight years of the Clintons to blame?  How did so much of what Obama and 111th Dems call "necessary" seem so different and opposed to Clintons’ rash unfunding and underfunding to a unnecessary surplus years before its time?

AND THEN THERE WAS ONE — and the one was the United States of America - as a lone superpower.   How poorly did the Clintons govern and lead relative to such a rare and unplanned global status updating for us?   With each "austerity" measure many should now be asking, and with clear and measured accounting to a overdue "compare and contrast" with Bush eight years.

We didn’t need 9/11!  We didn’t need 9/11!  We didn’t need 9/11 as an excuse to re-enter Afghanistan for humane purposes those Clinton eight years our early exit and absence let fester an "abandonment" and danger we had moral case to from our earlier presence and early exit?

We didn’t need Operation Iraqi Freedom?  We didn’t need to wait so long to live up to hour historical post war precedence of prosecutions and fair trials like Nuremberg?  It was also wrong to pass those eight years of Clintons with their official line for Iraq of a peoples of a majority as "not capable of governing themselves" and with such a "peoples" of a specific religion/sect?

AND THEN THERE WAS ONE — and defense and intelligence cuts and cuts and more cuts and PEACE DIVIDENDS before their time.  Did the Clintons use the CIA to lie about "peace"?

Now that President Obama is down to just one, how much will he too be blaming the Clintons?

Now that defense cuts not to be left out of work further in our CRISIS OF VALUATION that now has "revaluations" an allowed and available tool towards lowering "costs of living" but not "standard of living" we may still stand alone or near alone.

It is arguable that the size of the "coalition" for OPERATION IRAQI FREEDOM had to be smaller than the "coalition" for the PERSIAN GULF WAR and because "volunteer armed forces" essential for such to be a "liberation" not an "occupation" and so of "stand down as they stand up" sensibilities.

And, well The United States of America is few among many with an armed forces of volunteers.

Can President Obama govern without the Clintons?  Can he avoid "TITULAR HEAD"?

Three equal branches, right?  Boy can he shake "deputy president" to Clintons?

The one was the United States near unique with its volunteer armed forces beholden to their Constitution.

Luckily the Dems these past couple years were pressed by a media not "state run."

A BONNIE AND CLYDE PARABLE?

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 1:24 pm

WHERE ELSE TO A "FRAME OF MIND" SHOULD ONE BE TO START AN ATTEMPTED INTERPRETATION OF OUR 22 AMENDMENT?

WE ARE OF A CONSTITUTION TO CAUTION AND CARE WITH A BASIS IN "CHECKS AND BALANCES."

WE ARE OF A GOVERNANCE STILL SUPPOSED TO BE OF "COMMON SENSE" AND "EVERYDAY CONCERNS."

WE ARE OF A GOVERNMENT WITH NEAR THE MOST UNIQUE "EXECUTIVE OFFICE" IN THE WORLD AND SO WITH OUR "OFFICE OF PRESIDENT" BEING A "HOME OFFICE."

WE ARE A PEOPLE CELEBRANT AND DEFENSIVE IN PROTECTIONS OF MARRIAGE AND PRIVACY RIGHTS AND PROPERTY RIGHTS.

OUR 22 AMENDMENT IS HISTORICAL FOR BEING THOUGHT A NECESSITY AND PRUDENT LEGISLATIVE MOVE TO THE HIGHEST ORDERING OF AN "AMENDING" TO OUR CONSTITUTION AND SO SOON UPON THOSE YEARS WHERE FIRST LADY ELEANOR ROOSEVELT AND HER DAUGHTER WERE THOUGHT TO HAVE BECOME THE EFFECTIVE "HOLDERS" OF OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICE AND MAYBE "POPULAR" FOR SUCH WHILE "LEGEND" OF FDR CARRIED HIM PAST "UNABLE" TO PERFORM CONCERNS.

WE ARE OF AN EXECUTIVE OFFICE NOW WITH TERM LIMITS TO TWO TERMS SO "ELECTED" AND YET STILL WITH RESPECT TO "MARRIAGE LAWS" AROUND ISSUES WHERE AN ACT OF ONE SPOUSE SUFFICIENT TO BE OF "AN ACT" OF THE OTHER SPOUSE ESPECIALLY AS REGARDS RECORDS AND "HOME OFFICES."

WE ARE NOW OF A DAY WHERE SUCH IS MORE CONFUSED BUT MORE IMPORTED TO IT NOT MATTERING THE "SEX" OF THE "INTIMATE SEEMING CO-HOLDER" OF THE OFFICE ONE THIRD OF OUR THREE EQUAL BRANCHES OF FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.

WE ARE OF A PROTECTION TO PRESIDENTS SUCH THAT SOME RECORD CAN BE KEPT FROM THE PUBLIC PERVIEW AND FOR THIRTY YEARS, AND THESE PAPERS A "SPOUSE" REGARDLESS OF SEX HAS BEEN AN INTIMATE FULLY ALLOWED AND EVEN EXPECTED "WILLING" CO-ACTOR.

OUR NATION HAS SO MANY PROTECTIONS TO CHECK AND BALANCES AND PRIVACY SUCHT THAT IS SEEMS ABSURD FOR OUR 22ND AMENDMENT NOT TO NATURALLY PREVENT A SPOUSE OF A TERM LIMITED PRESIDENT AND ESPECIALLY SO AS SUCH COULD BE JUST AN ATTEMPT TO CIRCUMVENT TO INTENT OF THE LAW AROUND LIMITS TO A RETURNING OF A LIMITED PRESIDENT BACK INTO THE INTIMATE "DECIDING" OF OUR OFFICE OF PRESIDENT.

LIKE LEAVING HONEY OUT FOR A BEAR AND EXPECTING IT TO STAY AWAY?

LIMITED SO BUT ONLY UNTIL ALL RECORDS ARE OPENED TO THE PUBLIC AND WITHOUT SHORTENING THE PROTECTIONS FROM CURRENT THIRTY YEARS?

AN INTERPRETATION OF 22 AMENDMENT THAT DOESN’T PREVENT A LIMITED PRESIDENT FROM BEING RETURNED IN LAW "ACCIDENTALLY" BY ALLOWANCES IN A MARRIAGE LAW OF MARRIAGE RIGHTS AS NECESSARILY TO "EXPECTED" TO ALSO HAVE BEEN "ELECTED" TO RETURN IS SEEMINGLY ABSURD.  

AN ALLOWANCE OF A SPOUSE TO EVEN A CAMPAIGNING TO SUCH OFFICE IS ABSURD IN LIGHT OF SO MANY OF OUR PROTECTIONS AND LAWS TO HELP PREVENT CORRUPT ACTIVITIES. 

AN "ELECTION" OF A SPOUSE, REGARDLESS OF THEIR SEX, TO OUR OFFICE OF OUR PRESIDENCY EVEN AS JUST A EQUAL BRANCH TO CONGRESS ON ITS FACE APPEARS TO BE REDICULOUS AND ABSURD AND ARGUABLE UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

THERE IS AN ALLOWANCE TO SPOUSES OF ‘PROTECTIONS’ THAT DESERVES GREATER PROTECTION AND AWARENESS IN CONCERNS TO OUR MOST UNIQUE EXECUTIVE OFFICE DESIGNED AND PERPETUATED AS A "HOME OFFICE" TOO.

BEST ‘INTERPRETATION’ TO HELP GOVERNMENT AND ALL OUR PEOPLE TO A GOOD FUTURE?

SUCH SHOULD HELP ALL MEDIA AND JOURNALISTS TO A DECENT STANDARD.

AND, THEN OF COURSE THEIR THEN BECOMES THE QUESTION TO "DESERVING."

1/5/2011

AMANDA - MY BEAUTIFUL ON HER BIRTHDAY

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 3:58 pm

See I never both expected my Christmas giftcard order gift to have arrived so timely nor that Bella may have need to be walked under all the proper and necessary municiple scrutiny of NYC law and ordinances.

See I also never expected that my purchase for new "walking shoes" in spirit of New Balance as "running shoes" would arrive today and not inconsequentially tomorrow as just NYC walking shoes designed appropriately in the spirit of cheap journo simple styling in journo fashionisto to match Sears suits in Arrow brand on year end sales.

See I also never expected that my new sneakers as ordered as New Balance 2010 910s would  be an "artistic" omage to future Constitutional concerns that should be of a leading to such a judgement that both "Bill" and "Hillary" end up in "Gitmo" with "indefinite" confinement the proper consideration.

I had no idea I had ordered from LL Bean a pair of last years sneaker model of their 9/10 modeling that seems most designed to be the best shoe wear for NYC walk about in 2011 and beyond – a dark gray pair of New Balance 910 sneakers to replace an near worn out pair of same brand but with "twin towers" in the "N" on the sides, artistically.

I had no idea I had ordered a pair of sneakers as running or walking shoes best for NYC and journos as a darker pair more stylish to NYC pedestrian time in suits.

It was an on sale item fitting my last LL Bean order but now maybe adjusted past the old sell them to being a larger shoe size than they thought they fit.  Hmmm, did I want the smaller size if to wear such with dress socks, or didn’t I.  Was there a conspiracy among sneaker companies to sell shoes with larger marked sizes than a same foot would choice for "dress shoes"?

So now I know I have a new pair of sneakers that seemed to be to a "new balance" considering to 9/10 for preventing another 9/11and remembering.   Probably best to keep them mostly for walking.

1/4/2011

MANAGING HILLARY - BAGWOMAN

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 11:53 am

No this is not as simple in "green" to be about shopping bags, though "Hillary" as a "carpetbagger" definitely on the table to be registered.

Yes these are the days to remember Demi Moore in A FEW GOOD MEN, and maybe as the "brains" and necessary "femine perspective" for the character played by Tom Cruise to be victorious and patriotic.

Yes these are the days where Demi Moore in lycra cycling shorts as Oscar attire as well a women of her times and topical in her arts.

See, it seems Bill and Hillary are counting on us as Americans "not able to handle their truth."

Who is the Demi Moore of our fashion and politics in 2011 A.D.?   Who has replaced Tom Cruise?

In my last blogged column I was mentioning remembering former President Bill Clinton admitting in a worked to "come to Jesus" confessional dream sequencing specifically with an "I was behind it."

I do not know what to make of such and if a National Security imperative may excuse even if such could have been maybe stopped by him in months after his presidency of an inciting to such.

I do not know but have well considered that planes were "remote controlled" and likely were flown by dedicated radicals committed in "Holy War" resolve.  

I do not know how or why - just a that a former President was atleast likely admitting to more than gross negligence by he in his admininstrating.  I did fax the NSC that day or morning after maybe having slept on such an unexpected outcome of my organizing to probe to detect corruption at our highest levels as an amatuer knowing he had enough networking to have at least one attempt at such.  See I was open to all as guilty or some and then to such thinking I had to move to considering it may have been Bush or Cheney and their CIA.

"Bill’s" admittal was unexpected but not blocked as possible.  And how?

Not a "government conspiracy" with too many people and ears and eyes upon?   And inciting?

Selfish politics?   A gift to new Senator Hillary Clinton to help her suddenly become a sympathetic global figure in a near complete and extreme make-over sufficient to help them both out of the dungeon of low seniority in a Senate so of "SENIORITY"?

Was it just negligence and a haunting of guilt but then still guilt that should have us electing anyone but a Clinton so knowing of such a failing?

Demi Moore in lycra cycling shorts as Oscar garb >>> GOOD GREEN ?  <<<<

Hillary Clinton power hungry politician in pants suit >>>> BAD GREEN ? <<<<

So to still understanding the "come to Jesus" confession that I faxed a reporting to the NSC then of - not an assumption of guilt but an attempt to empathize and sympathize to a better understanding of "Bill" confession?

They would have been miserable!  It would have been truly unbearable for them both!

The Clintons wouldn’t have been able to stand being "low couple" on Senate totem pole?  

Something had to give?  How do we get a "crisis" without directing to a "crisis"?  How might we just thoroughly and regularly incite some of our known "enemies" or "radicalized to Anti-Americanisms"?

Could there even have been a National Security Imperative to give them a sense of justification?  That is while also being able to justify their known effecting to a new and better "wall of separation" at the FBI between enforcement and intelligence such as maybe necessary for their "inciting" to have sufficient chance at success needed for their desired "crisis" political come back?

We know she was a carpetbagger and a new junior most Senator used to so much more - but did they have any legal authority to ease a confessed seeming guilt?

We know First Lady Hillary did CRUSADE and on turf of radicals an to a calling of Americans to support and agree and accept her very inciteful to incendiary proclamations to another countries and regions peoples of different traditions.

But was she actually a bag-woman to a "leader" of radicals with cash to cover stipends to families of suicide bombers?  They wouldn’t have gone that far even though she had the means and plenty of opportune moments abroad in little known places.

Really when I organized then to such a dream sequencing soft probing I was of accepting I was to find out the Clintons were right in helping efforts to blame Bush/Cheney. 

And, now we have the Obama administration that can be said to have been to nothing but blame game politics to an very vast cover-up effort such that any "blaming" kept from Clintons’ and their years completely to the rediculous.

Until "it was all the fault of the Bush’s eight years…"  reasonable consideration had to be left to both admins maybe responsible and "legally" with National Security and Executive Powers.  

It cannot have been "all the fault of the Bush years"!   So why such an vast and extreme attempt to "cover-up"?  

The Clintons are one in a life time and "irresplaceable" politic we need to raise and maintain above all others?

Yes, the Clintons can be guilty and the Al Qaeda holy warriors as well and separately.

Yes, Al Qaeda may have been "called" to such an attack with a sense of Justice and the Clintons may have knowingly incited them with their specific politics and ‘decisions’ and while selling "Hillary’s Crusades" to Americans such that they could as they did after 9/11 blame the American people and not themselves.

They did blame the "American people" after 9/11 and with their off handed "we did what the people wanted us to do"  (like)  even though it was "Hillary’s Crusades" much her life story and ambition.

It was former Clinton NSC Philip Bobbitt who wrote in TERROR AND CONSENT that we should be weary of our White House and Washington politics getting too "Hollywood" in direct working with "Hollywood" for such seems to beget terrorism.

And, still it was on 9/11/01 that such "terror" was meant as a response not of a direction and though better for Clintons to have happened with the most expected next president then Al Gore.   They all could have become war heroes with fixed and convenient "exit date" and gotten world to ignore Saddam Hussein as other than a "necessary" politician for his "circumstances" quite like their rational for themselves.

Still 9/11 didn’t help with Saddam Hussein or arguments for a long over due prosecution that best would have happened in a Neuremberg precedence within Clintons’ "two-fer" first term.   Of course Bush admin should have been talking about Saddam Hussein and Iraq as early as their first day a new administration, but still really it seems 9/11 was about the worst way to proceed with their concerns for regional stability and a fair and overdue prosecution of Saddam Hussein.

1/3/2011

THAT GREEN LADY

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 10:55 am

Wednesday, is a special day.

Wednesday in this year 2011 A.D. in a world again seeming united in celebrating the Christian calender.

Wednesday by any other calender to so as set and measured.

January 5, 2011, specifically.

To some it will be more Christian while others just more personal and/or political.

In this year 2011 A.D. now so soon upon a global celebrating Christian in calender beyond the special "personal" of this Wednesday parts of Washington in retreat.

No matter your calender this Wednesday a call to bulster the "Fourth Estate" and the other three, anew.

>REPUBLICANS HAVE "GREEN" DEMS ON THE ROPES<

>A NEW MORAL RIDES TO TOWN - A SWEARING<

>PELOSI - THE GREEN LADY - IN RETREAT<

>THE GREEN LADY SECRETARY CLINTON …<

>THE GREEN LADY CLINTON DOOMED OBAMA/DEMS<

>PELOSI CONGRESS TOO GREEN TOO GREEN<

>GREEN CLINTON DOOMED - NOTHING WORKED WAY EXPECTED<

>NEWS ALERT - NOTHING WORKED THE WAY THEY EXPECTED<

>DON’T BE SO VANE - THIS MAY NOT BE ABOUT YOU<

>THE FOURTH ESTATE ADMITS PAST ERRORS PROMISES TO CHANGE<

>GREEN CLINTON STILL POLITICIAN THAT GAINED MOST FROM 9/11 - NOW WHAT?<

Not to suggest that we should conclude that because so much of what Secretary of State Clinton, Speaker Pelosi or President Obama ended up working out differently than they professed that "green" and "inexperienced" or "negligent" a more appropriate "label" than conspiracy - a vast left wing conspiracy.

In this new year of 2011 A.D. as measured and set a Christian Calender we now enter a new politic of "good green" and "bad green" - do you have a trusted source in "green"?

>GREEN CLINTON STILL POLITICIAN THAT GAINED MOST FROM 9/11 - NOW WHAT?<

>IS JUST GIVING AWAY AMERICAN DOLLARS OF FUTURE EARNINGS OF OUR FUTURE GENERATIONS WHEN ‘TOUGH LOVE’ AN AVAILABLE FOURTH LEG OF/FOR HER "STOOL" AS "GREEN CLINTON" HAS BEEN FOR SHORT-TERM "POPULARITY" ACTUALLY "CAVING IN TO TERRORISTS"? — IS SUCH JUST A "GIFTING" TO AFFIRM "SOCIALISM" AND "TYRANNY" JUST OK WITH US?<

>HILLARY MUST GO?  — WHAT WAS PRESIDENT CLINTON, YEARS AGO IN A LIKE TV "COME TO JESUS" DREAM SEQUENCE ADMITTING TO ABOUT 9/11?  JUST NEGLIGENCE?  I WAS BEHIND IT "GUILT"?  — HILLARY MUST GO?<

In this new year 2011 A.D. of the Christian Calender ushering how now to tell the good green from the bad green - how now to be of the good in green and reliably?

>DEMS ONLY WAY FROM "RETREAT" TO ADMIT THEY MEANT ECONOMY TO SUCH AS NOW AND AS NECESSARY IN A VAST LEFT WING CONSPIRACY TO AUSTERITY, NECESSARY AND PLANNED — DEMS CAN SAVE THEMSELVES BY ADMITTING TO ACTUALLY BEING WISE EXPERTS ON THE ECONOMY THAT THESE TIMES HAVE BEEN TO UNTIL NOW SEEMING ACCIDENTALLY AND UNEXPECTEDLY<

DO YOU HAVE A RELIABLE SOURCE IN "GREEN" IN THIS NEW YEAR? 

1/1/2011

TO BE - TO BE - TO BE DRAMATIC AND AUSTERE?

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 11:02 am

Green science and "GREEN" marketing so sexy for an economics major concerned with efficiencies and scarce resources.

BELLA!   BELLA!  BELLA!

Oh, so sexy.

Oh, can we go more green?

BELLA!  BELLA!  BELLA!

Don’t need no stinkin "won’t stay at home and bake cookies" "it takes a village" selfish un-american reaching to autocracy.

This is no ALERT to an armageddon yet I know a couple women happy it seems with new guns this new year.

Seems I have "GROUPIES" and yet don’t know whom, specifically, they be - they that logged on at New Years to see what I had "blogged."

HAPPY NEW YEAR and a furtherance in your pursuits of happiness - THE AMERICAN WAY.

WOE, WOE, WOE THE POOR POLITICIANS FAR FROM AUSTERE IN REACHING WITH GLOBAL WARMING ALARMISM AND SO WHILE TO A PRIORITIZING THAT POLAR BEARS WERE MORE IMPORTANT THAN HUMAN BEINGS AND ALL THE WHILE TO THE CENSUS STATISTICS SHOWING THAT MORE AMERICANS WERE MOVING TO WARMER CLIMATES VOLUNTARILY.

BELLA!   BELLA!  BELLA!

oooops.

BELLA?   BELLA?   BELLA?

So Putin still wants to be competitive with the TIME Magazine 2006 Man of the Year.  So sexist?

Is "Hillary" another red headed Russian spy?   Too "dramatic"?  Too selfish?  Too un-american?

Oh so sexy  ~~~~~~!   Can we go more "green"?

Mozel tov!  Mozel troika?

Troika, did someone say "Troika"? 

Oh, Hi, Hillary - got you with that didn’t I?

BELLA?   BELLA?   BELLA?

Mozel Troika?

What are you - Russian?   Un-American?   Selfish to autocracy?   Of the shadow government of CGI?

Green science and "GREEN" marketing so sexy for an economics major concerned with efficiencies and scarce resources.

BELLA?   BELLA?  BELLA?

Has every "state" dollar "Hillary" has spent to buy "popularity" where once more austere and prudent Bush/Cheney/Haig like…/Rice et cetera ‘unpopularity’ the old sexy actually been wasted U.S. tax payer dollars?  

Happy New Year!

Happy pursuits of happiness in this new year.

BELLA?   BELLA?  BELLA?

Oh, high Demi and Ashton - you are not alone in "guns are BIG this year."

?????

Does anyone know what time of day it is - like really?

A new year has dawned - so much for Pres B~~~~ O~~~~’s "team of rivals" not having been/being "rivals."

Has every U.S. dollar our Secretary of State Hillary Rodham "redheaded" Clinton been distributing where President Bush admin didn’t been wasted and irresponsible and better to have been "homemade cookies"?

{Did you know I baked homemade cookies for many of my Christmas gifting?} 

Please don’t be sexist or bigoted in the New Year and please remember we were not designed to be other than we were designed to be.