12/15/2010

POLITICS 101

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 8:44 am

Where to start?

With the problem?

With the issues around the apparent problem collateral damage?

With the solution?

With the fastest solution?

With the best solution?

With the easiest solution?

With the best solution for some?

With the best solution for all?

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

So President Obama an administer with a "too partisan" problem and from his own choices, politics and specific subjecting and blaming.

So President Obama and near all Democrats of past two years of Washington politics have been of an "all not the fault of Clintons" with "none the fault of Clintons" postulating in hard partisan and very personal blame game politics with all the fault of Bush’s administering.

That simply limites his options now - very POLITICS 101 - HILLARY MUST GO, HE HAS TO OFFER THEM SOME SHOW OF "GOOD WILL."

It stopped being (clean) politics of keeping "middle ground" available not necessarily when President Obama on his first day in office was to making "all the faults" those of the "other" party.

It stopped being (clean and reasonable) politics of keeping "middle ground" alternatives available for reasonable compromise and "backing down" without him now needing to feed the Republicans his Secretary of State.

It stopped being (clean, reasonable and just) politics as of day one left foot foward with a partisan blame game based upon the proposition that Clintons’ had no "guilt"/"fault."

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

VERY SIMPLE POLITICS - ONLY ONE SIMPLE SOLUTION - HILLARY MUST GO!

Clintons’ both should have been of Ken Starr hearings around "disbarrable" practices of the allegiance and corrupted cohorting of the Clinton "two-fer." 

Such seems a certainty now - "How long have they been corrupted - not if."?

It is unreasonable to think that President Obama can fix the "partisan" divide now without removing "Hillary" for she is a road block to its progress, and one "supposedly" so skilled in "politics" that she already should have resigned by now, as such is an "inescapable" in just Politics 101. 

Such seems a certainty now - unless other than having failed her way to this level and of having been of a record as "statesman" like as Richard Holbrooke and so with a record that spoke to her even slightly "irresplaceable" - a turning of a cheek by any Republicans now would quite be a "corrupting" with a "knowing" accomplicing.

It actually would be "INSANE" if "Hillary" disagreed with such in schools of basic "diplomacy" or "politics" at even Politics 101 level - Just INSANE!

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

EVEN HILLARY SHOULD CONSIDER THAT REPUBLICANS ARE SEEING THE ERROR OF THEIR WAYS NOW IN NOT ONCE BACKING A CO-PROSECUTION OF BOTH IN CLINTON ‘TWO-FER’ AROUND THE MONICA LEWINSKI HEARINGS TO IMPEACHABILITY AND DISBARRING.  HILLARY MUST NOW REALIZE THE REPUBLICANS SEE THEY DIRTIED THEMSELVES LETTING HER OFF A FAIRLY JUSTIFIABLE CO-PROSECUTION THEN FOR SUCH SO JOINED AND NOW WOULD BE TO A WILLING AND KNOWING "CORRUPTION" THEMSELVES TO ACCEPT ANOTHER DAY OF SECRETARY OF STATE CLINTON IN AN OFFICIAL PARTISAN PRESIDETIAL POSTING.  EVEN HILLARY SHOULD REALIZE THEIR IS NO ‘UP SIDE’ FOR REPUBLICANS FROM LETTING HER STAY UN-CHIDED AND EVEN MAYBE ‘PROSECUTED’ AND THAT SHE REALLY CANNOT ARGUE SHE DESERVES ANOTHER LIKE EXTREME MAKEOVER.

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Clintons may even think of now trying to downsize to one home to free up money and assets for legal defense funds.  How else does a too partisan president get past such a left foot forward so heavy and first and loudly? 

The Clintons, both, are supposed to be the "EXPERTS" on such basic politics - If they have an "answer" otherwise it cannot possibly still be as simple as the "is" definition as "is"?

How would any Republican on their swearing in not be of a "knowing" and "wilful" "corruption" themselves if to then be of accepting "Hillary’s" and "Clintons’ ‘two-fer’s’" lowered standards - Such would only be a proclamation of accepting to the postulated to "none of the fault of the Clintons’ years."