12/9/2010

ALL THE PRESIDENT’S MEN/WOMEN

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 11:38 pm

THIS IS NOT A TEST!

By early reporting of a "scheduled meeting" for tomorrow the train may have left the station.

Now struck and joined so such as presented like in active tense of "impeachable Nixonian" tomorrow now to "who or whom" but not "what."

THIS IS NOT A TEST!

By early report to a schedule "meeting" at the Obama White House with President Clinton and as "reported" set,  it now maybe just a matter of whom and when.

THIS IN NOT A TEST!

Where is Woodward?  Where is Bernstein?  Where is Frost?   Tomorrow has been set and writ to a conspiring (criminal necessarily?) in the "if a President says it is legal, it is legal" in tense of "impeachable Nixonian."

THIS IS NOT A TEST!  REALLY, BUT IT WOULD CERTAINLY HELP IF YOU ALREADY READ "AMERICAN CIVICS 101."

Whom?  All the Presidents’ men/women?  Just all the President’s men/women?

THIS IS NOT A TEST!

As prefaced the reported meeting at Obama White House tomorrow with President Clinton can only as so currently "rumored" be to an agreement to subvert and pervert our Constitution and our President’s oath of office.   Such a meeting can only be to "how" - how to effect "if a president says it is legal it is legal" conspriracy to subvert and pervert.

THIS IS NOT A TEST!

If President Clinton even shows up in the attitude of current rumors for such a meeting in such a place it would be better for President Obama to have him arrested before President Clinton has President Obama arrested.

THIS IS NOT A TEST!

The reported rumored to be scheduled meeting at the Obama White House with President Clinton in the air of "all the fault of past eight years" is to necessarily a (criminal) conspiracy to subvert and pervert the intent of our Constitution and our Presidents’ oaths of office.

Seriously President Obama better check President Clinton and all of both their men and women and subjects for listening and bugging/taping devices, for President Clinton quite likely to hear active orations in the tense of "impeachable Nixonian" at least as they still are of perporting.

The purpose of such a meeting as rumored or reasonable in such current politics can only be to conspire to subvert and pervert in aires most likely past reasonable in "if a president says it is legal then it is legal."

THIS IS NOT A TEST!  THIS IS USING THEIR OWN PLAYBOOK, AND REASONING.

THIS IS NOT A JOKE, EITHER.

If they do meet and meet where reported to be rumored to be scheduled to meet it may be best that President Obama has President Clinton arrested on at least a willingness to conspire to subvert and pervert their oaths of office, and quite better that he have President Clinton arrested before Presidents Clintons have him arrested.

But, you know if President Clinton doesn’t actually manage to get a recording of President or his men or women or subjects President Obama would just be of President Clinton’s word against his word so would be a bit safer.

No really, as long as President Obama offers a willingness to protect Clintons’ eight years with his "all the fault of the Bush’s eight years" then such a meeting as reported rumored scheduled to be joined can seriously be thought to actually be quite set to in the active tense and clearly with intent to in the "impeachable Nixonian" structure of old.

THIS IS NOT A TEST!  AND,  AMERICAN CIVICS 101 NOW FOLLOWS, AND, QUITE SPOT ON THAT A "SILENCE" BY REPUBLICANS TOMORROW NOT EVEN WISE FOR THOSE MAYBE "GUILTY."

AMERICAN CIVICS 101?

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 8:48 pm

Are you really a student of United States of America history and politics?

Are you even really just a novice enthusiast?

Tomorrow is now rumored/reported to be a mere "meeting" at the White House with…& …about???

What is rumored to be scheduled is farthest from a "mere meeting" than maybe ever in our history as a union of states of one republic.

Dems and President Obama have announced a schedule "move" and "piece play" for tomorrow that has consequence and as yet unknown or even predictable significance.

On the face it may seem innocuous and "minor" so of having President Clinton to the Obama White House, but that would be a mistake.

Scheduled as announced around talk of President Obama trying to "pull a post 1994 Clinton" tomorrow is nothing short of a very dangerous throwing down of a gauntlet.

See, just by trying to play such piece around such "politics" means that if Republicans stay silent and even to below "loud and protesting" then Republicans likely are responsible for 9/11 and feeling a need to stay silent on "all Bush’s fault" and "inherited it from Bush" like never before.   Tomorrow cannot pass without protest from Republicans on "historical perspective" or "historical accuracy" and "intellectual honesty" as now scheduled with White House of Obama without a Republican "silence" an admitting of "fault" or "mere involvement".  

Some times a action just has to have its equal and opposite reaction.

So tomorrow may now be on, and on to becoming the maybe most pivotal day in all of our young confederate republic’s history.

Tomorrow ends if so "scheduled" any "leeway" for Clintons with Republicans like those days past the "Clintons’ inheritance" left Bush/Cheney of 9/11 and the soft shoe tapping to distract and entertain protective of Clintons with an official allowance that the Clintons and their deputies would be allowed "room" to spin to "we just did what the people asked us to do" and well that old simple "blue states said do this and red states said do that" chorus.   Tomorrow, politically, if scheduled so ends with such "gauntlet" play any future reason for Republicans to co-operate with Democrats unless Clinton(s) actually do a mea culpa us.

Even Senator Reid may suffer as never before for he buffer from involvement in what was a corporate save and take over of Las Vegas under his watch is now on the table as much as major corporate and private efforts about the same time to save Time Square, and with both private and maybe non-government efforts completely to remarket America away from that undefended gap Saddam saw a way to drive through like a global conquerer of superior PR + war waging.

See, tomorrow if so scheduled at Obama White House as rumored/reported with a "saving" visit by President Clinton, then all Republicans may have to erupt in protest and self defense even if "involved" or "fault" Democrats charge is merely from their fight to prevent a global establishment of an un-Constitutional to merely "extra-Constitutional" AUTOCRACY OF CLINTONS and with tomorrow if so scheduled a calling to such as a past reality but popular as sold by Clintons in their popular cultural warring in "two-fer" fog to a necessary new global reality and necessity.

So even if Republicans have some "fault" around 9/11 as long accused though to far worse "fault" tomorrow they cannot stay silent.

So even if Republicans felt called to "respond" and "fight back" against the Clintons’ drive and charge to end the two party system and Constitutional basis of our United States of America if not to their perferred goal of a Clinton Global Autocracy and to just a lock for one party and Democrat Party domination with a shadow government of a Clinton Global Iniative (or something), and, to a need to be "global" and "equal" to such threat and its realness and depth and "fog" then tomorrow is a day they at least have to be loud in such and with such as their "DEFENSE".

"IT IS ALL THE FAULT OF THE PAST EIGHT YEARS" can only stand if tomorrow some to most Republicans just roll over and stay silent without any protestations.

It is not possible to allow that 9/11 wasn’t "all the fault of the Clintons’ eight years" at least as maybe a call to 9/11 as a defense of our Constitution.  

Republicans cannot dare stay silent tomorrow without such being an willing and freely exercise confession of much guilt and wrongness, and such as not at least half the fault of the Clintons’ and their eight years as at least "negligent" years.

So even if the Republicans had nothing to do with 9/11 a silence tomorrow will slay them silently and virulently with guilt.

So even if 9/11 had some as yet unexplainable willful "invisible hands" within tomorrow cannot pass without such being called out and as it must have been as a necessary "DEFENSE" of our Constitution and from maybe even the Clintons of a holding of next presidency "hostage" and "highjacked" to hold onto to new Clinton global autocracy as much as they were able to establish.

President Obama,  if President Clinton is even willing to show up tomorrow you may want to arrest him.  He cannot be of help to you, within any "reasonable" rationale I have yet considered.

To understand what Clintons were effectively to in the 1990s and with a full considering around what they decided not to be up to and that such really wasn’t "them just doing what the people had asked them to do" as profered many many times as their "defense" around 9/11 with a projection and transference to like "it was the American peoples fault…" may take just a personal asking of yourself about that/this Clinton Global Autocracy reaching with a hope to at least effect to a Clinton Autocracy and lasting power grab at home enough to effectively silent our two party system.

TEXT “C A S H” TO …

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 12:02 pm

And so it came to pass, that a great opportunity was left to wither on the Dems’ "vines."

We had the technology - we had the economics - we had a NEW "house" on a good foundation!

We just needed like "new Alcoa Aluminum" gutters for a "Certificate of Occupancy" and "TEXT… TO…"!

But, alas, they came to say "we need a new foundation" - but why, but how?

"We just needed the new Alcoa Aluminum seemless gutters and a new key can be passed properly C.O.’d:  APPROVED!"

WE HAVE THE TECHNOLOGY - WE CAN BUILD ON TEXT… TO… AND GIVE!

Why still to: "we need a new foundation" and in old big government "GUILTING" to record new SPEND AND TAX?

TEXT "C  A  S  H" TO … (CAUSE HERE LINKED)  TO SUPPORT WITH A TEN DOLLAR DONATION ADDED AND PAID THROUGH YOUR PHONE/WIFI BILL IN PLEDGE TO > CITIZENS AGAINST SELFISH HOARDERS <  > CASH for short?  [old canvassing joke, from days of winter door to door citizen action canvassing chit chat.]

A new "foundation" wasn’t needed nor new BIG GOVERNMENT anew in GUILT TAXATION and GUILT justifications.

Just a TEXT… TO… "OPTION" FOR BILLIONAIRES  >> TEXT  ***** TO …  TO CONTRIBUTE ONE MILLION DOLLARS TO SUCH CAUSE IN PLEDGE WITH YOUR NEXT PHONE OR WIFI BILL!

We can rebuild it!  We can rebuid it!  We can rebuild it?

And to a new tech solution that allows less BIG GOVERNMENT GUILT and more happy citizen cohorting and socializing with flocking around "pop" and "hip" new "solutions" where dollar for dollar a dollar given to go further?

[I think the old canvassing joke started as:  Hello, my name is _______________ and I am here tonight canvassing on behalf of CITIZENS AGAINST SEAL HUNTING — PLEASE GIVE!  AND PLEASE JUST MAKE YOUR CHECK OUT TO "C.A.S.H." (CASH!!!) - Thank you.]

So no need for Million Dollar Man solutions most days you walk down the street - your street - and see a pot-hole or a broken water main?   No instinct even to think past what bus or "how many blocks to walk" to find a doctor and medical care?   So when and where are you in your daily trapsing where you actually do think you need to call Washington first even because of a pot-hole - and while remembering seeing a "Hot-Patch" at local lumber yard on sale for less than $20 and sufficient for such?

{Hard to blame this one on just Clintons – but then "Mr. President" Bill Clinton did seem to hold newly elected President Obama "hostage" on first official visit (or near) to New York City with a political power play of insisting President Obama visit his Harlem Fiefdom and with Press and CAMERAS for a "bowing" to President Clinton with a broadcastable "President Obama of saying ‘Mr. President" to President Bill Clinton with enough respect and "aires" of like "well I can never be as great as you - Mr. President Clinton"?}

{Hard to blame this one on just Clintons – but then near first move of new Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was to a proclamation that she would take her "guidance" from same place Dante did (meaning I think God and not the Devil) and as Presidents Clintons had and so as most clever "insubordination" and to obvious "subterfuge" yet maybe ever witness in Executive Office Cabinet Level Politics.  See "Hillary" seemed outright from day one to be saying she wouldn’t be listening to President Obama for her sense of "duty of charge of office."}