12/8/2010

AMERICAN ESSENCE - ODE O’ CLINTONS

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 12:20 pm

Whose jurisdiction is it anyways?

She who smelt it - dealt it?   She who smelled it - cast it?  She who smelt it cast it?

It is inescapable now.    The beat goes on, the heat must be brought to cast still anew.

The Clintons a poor "alloy" of poor and inferior "metallurgy"?

Whose jurisdiction is it anyways?

The "rich" - the "evil capitalists" do not have to work, but have, and have been to generating to income and profits into a federal revenue stream.  

Whose jurisdiction is it anyways?

Our communities and states have the power to tax weatlh and property, rightly.

Whose jurisdiction is it anyways?

Our federal government and its primary revenue justification of a basis more "democratic" in productivity and "work" and as yet another way to "express" or "vote" upon current policies and politics.

Whose jurisdiction is it anyways?

And, now with our state’s Nation Guard units "combat ready" for "globe wide theaters" able maybe soon to return home ready to defend just their home states?

And, now so with a celebration of our states and such uniqueness and comparative advantages with a specific "quartering" program?

And, now with our federal government of attempting a taking of state’s rights beyond the practicability of our federal government’s revenue structure and "taking" method in it’s basis on income and profit/gain?

Whose jurisdiction is it anyways?

The wrought of the Clintons of faulty "alloys" and "metallurgy"?

The wrought of the Clintons with "Hillary for President" a conundrum to a lesser American essence?

The wrought of the Clintons with "Hillary for President" not just a call to vindication of "Bill" for his history of infidelity but also a call to celebrate "Hillary" as the empowerer and enabler? 

The wrought of the Clintons with "Hillary for President" still an unthinkable beat of a calling to celebrate infidelity and at our highest levels more than as just a favor to Clintons?

Whose jurisdiction is it anyways?

As the stink and "ode o’ Clintons" wafts anew?

As the era of Clintons of a recent attempt theirs to a vindication haunts anew in still poor "metallurgy"?

As the policies and politics of Clintons now of the same poor cast anew as Obama’s?

Whose jurisdiction is it anyways?

The rich do not have to work,  cannot be told to work to "income" or "profits" and can use not working as another way to "vote"?

The rich do not have to work,  and especially while Washington politician of a saying Americans have a right to not work, or at least not work to have comfortable living and benefits once of a needing of all to be working?

The rich have as much right not to work and to embrace Federal Government wanting to take care of them, and yet the Federal Government’s revenue stream isn’t of a taxation jurisdiction to fund such so?

Whose jurisdiction is it anyways?

Because of our tax structure across different levels of our Republic mustn’t some conclude it is not our fed’s jurisdiction to run programs that necessarily need a basis in wealth and property taxation - for fairness?

Oh, my what is all this "stink" - the ode o’ Clintons exposed rediculous and rude?

Shoot, what are all these "faults"?

Shoot, whose are all these poor casts?

Question authority?   Live our preparedness for our own states now even globally ready for "combat" with a "good" from the Clintons’ years a new emphasis also on our states’ National Guard uniquenesses, and each to their own "readiness" for global competitions? 

Quarter authority?   These are "COMMUNITY" issues not "BIG GOVERNMENT" necessities?

Question quartering?   Our federal revenue flow dependent on the will of the taxed and their "motivations" and "common sense" calling them to "adjust" to less productivity and profits whence a sense of "immoral" or "irrational" pervades into our national politic?

Whose jurisdiction is it anyways?

And, now with "Clintons are BIG LIARS" more to a "Clintons are bad liars"?