11/22/2010

GOING ALL IN

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 10:25 pm

While walking home with his blueberry muffin he took a side street detour that had him walking by the Borough’s only stained glass constructor.

"Surely in two hundred years stained glass will still be stained glass, but what by 1992 will actually be much different from the current state of human engagements?"  - The thought now a necessary bite of wisdom to consider he thought as he walked.

Another morning detour now necessary and reasonable as he was ahead of schedule this morning of the longer days and with time before school opened.

Five fellows in advanced math and physics interests needed to be cabled and so dispatched to thinking with him under pretence of a "school project" to arise interests further in math with a call to imaginations about possiblilities for "in fifty years" and "in a hundred years" and "in a hundred and fifty years" - steam engines already here and the railroad, so how much really might change, like.  A future meeting date should be set for a weekend of dialogue in Cincinnati for these five and Mr. Badger.

  • "Will good still exist in the world?"
  • "Will are young republic still be standing?"
  • "Who will be the families more of good?"
  • "Who will be the families burdened with vengence and evil?"
  • "When will advantages befall upon the vengeful accidentally?"
  • "When will the good triumph anew?"
  • "How will humans be different - will they be tools of new tools?"

All were fit into cables and sent with a note for the five fellows in math and physics to more imagine to the year 1992 as when the "worst" might be afoot.

"How will humans pine for earlier days - what will they be eating?"

"That should get it started, just fine."

Should be fun encouraging his current charge of young minds to imagine - maybe best not to encourage them to much more than fifty years forward.

"How evil to make the descendents of once Governor of New York Clinton now a critical consideration - will spouse be, will such be an angry but electable bachelor, or maybe even female - will spouse of president be the descendent and of the vengence and bitterness?"

So charged for seven and a half plays and with an expectation by town governors that such be self perpetuating in its own profits and returns "bite" had to be worked in somehow, with prudence for any production at THE BEAVER PLAYHOUSE.

"1992" will have to set the stage for "2012" and maybe still for all others plays.  But how?

"Will "1992" usher in a greedy selfish professional politician no willing to moderate themselves in the Washingtonian tradition of limited service and as limited service as necessary to prevent any and all slips more to autocracy or "royalty"?" 

"Will it become so anti-Washington in power reaching such that a couple will seek to themselves a "reigning" over United States and so abusive too to the "wait your turn" aspect of democracy and hierarchy still to exist even then?"

"GOSH THAT WOULD BE HORRIBLE!!!  Just imagine a student returning to a teacher after years of being taught "fairness" and "patience" such that they had timed their career in their head and with great ambition and effort to exhaustion many times more and greater than "normal" to find a spouse of a president stepping in line for two servings of his/her "good will" as theirs when tradition had been to a fairness to of "one serving per family" as an unspoken rule."   "JUST HORRIBLE - WHAT COULD I TELL A FORMER STUDENT SO AFTER HAVING WORKED HARDER AND MORE CREATIVELY AND LONGER THEN MOST - WITH A SPOUSE OF A PRESIDENT STEPPING IN AGAINST THE WASHINGTON TRADITION A SO TO STEP INTO AND UPON PLANS MADE FOR FAIR CONSIDERATION IN AMBITIONS."

"THAT WOULD HAVE A LOT OF BITE!!!  WOULD REALLY LIKELY RILE ALL THOSE WHO MIGHT ATTEND AS A VIOLATION OF A WASHINGTON STANDARD!!!  WHAT RIGHT WOULD A SPOUSE HAVE TO EVEN THINK THEMSELVES WORTHY OF SUCH AN EXCEPTION - HOW COULD THEY EVEN CALL IT ‘AMERICAN’?"

"Hmmm?  A Presidential couple that want to reign and reign and selfish and blind to a necessary ‘trampling’ of others?   An evil power grabbing couple of modest ability perpetuating their reign on the creativity and hardwork of others expecting them bound to the Washintonian standards and somehow to thinking such should still just "be willing to wait their turn" and oooh, all the while they of a taking of gains of others meant to have been a celebration of the other party?"

"Top of the morning Preacher Rousting."   "Should be an interested day at school."

"Top of the morning to you Mr. Badger."

{Mr. Badger to himself again>>> "Will student so taken aback have been of the other party and of an extra unusual ambition not to the presidency himself but to a creative future such that his "property"/"creations" were useful to a president seeking popularity beyond their own ability - will new presidential couple be of such sense of power they take such as their own without compensation or credit and so to a ‘trapping’ of such student from a use of his own work and his meant career path?"}

{Mr. Badger to himself again>>>  That about the worst a teacher could hear a former student arrive back with as a true story, most certainly.   Maybe best not to encourage students to think to work too hard for another or dream to much, such could really even happen in their own time.}