8/13/2010

BATTY! – LAWYERS UP! – SPOCKY?

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 7:32 am

Amendment 14, hmmm.

Amendment 22, ah hah!

Logic, oh my!

Oh the overlapping, the overlapping circles, the overlapping legal logic circles, so united.

Seems the 22nd Amendment doesn’t need to be changed just "understood"/interpreted with original intent, and paranoia like of around business accounting "separations" and safeguards.

Not sure about the 14th.   Haven’t even looked at it yet, since concern over their being over 300k per year born so in just 2008, so "illegally" and with the 14th a "carrot" towards "illegal" encouragement.

See though now, please, the overlapping legality of two as one in marriage in the US legally and so under the purview of the 22nd Amendment as Clintons.  I am talking not about teases dreaming of "marriage" but hard core full blown intimacy and unions like the Clintons of legally, as long as "married" as two logic circles never not with some overlap.

Batty?  Batty, the Clintons’ monolith of marketed "two-fer" though inseparable in law to separate circles?

Spocky?  Spocky, the logic that 22nd Amendment forbids all of a President from being returned into any holding, holding in itimacy of White House office, of office of the president, after two terms have been served?  Spocky that legally "Hillary" aka Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton was never to be legally "birthed" as a candidate for President, post President William Jefferson Clinton’s first term completion?  Spocky that legally "Hillary" was never to be "legally" birthed to "candidate for President" as 22nd Amendment forbids all of "Bill" from returning via "election"?

Batty?  That Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton so such, undivided, not, and logically, allowed, legally to be birthed or naturalized into any office within our "line of succession" to our presidency, and that essentially President Obama is in, arguably, a clear and certain violation of his oath of office to defend our Constitution?   Spocky?   Elementary?

Too cute?  Too cute the original intent of just the 22nd Amendment of Republican "sexy" with language and rhyme and reason the beat and words of standard marriage vows around "holding" as the intimate and indivisible so associating, inseparably, the intimate and corruptable, of an intimate of a President, regardless of sex, but fully concerned about sex, and corruptability, and greed, and slothfulness around "democracy"?

Amendment 14, hmmm?

Amendment 22, ah hah?

Clear and present language just needing "legal" ruling on "interpretation" around "original intent"?

Logic, oh my!

A spouse of a term limited president, regardless of sex (their sex) cannot be legally "elected" to a "holding" of office while electing such of inseparable in marriage and marriage rights to "holding" also at least also is such automatically an "electing" to returning some to all of a term limited president to such.

So, is it now that "Hillary" is an illegal Secretary of State so indivisible and without even considering how so many basic accounting principles exist to protect from such lines of overlapping blurring?   Is it still only arguable but while country is wise to be in an arguing mood, and with President  Obama  just a ruling and interpretation from "illegal" in with a ruled violation of his oath to defend our Constitution?

Lawyers up!   Seems, we do not need to amend either 14th or 22nd Amendments or call for a constitutional convention convening.  Seems, we just need to study and asses the existing language within and around so many other standard practices and even "checks and balances" of ours now to help protect us citizens even from absolute power corrupting even not absolutely, like just, intimately in marriage selfish "lying" for spousal defending.

That we have in case of Clintons two lawyers publicly known to be "liars" only helps dismiss the batty though not yet them as "batty" most.  Lawyers up!  Clintons have already established themselves of "lying for a spouse" a hire calling than "representing", democratically and transparently, and indivisible.

As Clintons play it, none of circle of "Bill" returns by "election" with a election of "Hillary" though inseparable in laws of marriage and standard around ‘no law should set another asunder’ like.   For convenience:  Clintons,  Clintons, are of a legal union leaving their logic circles inseparable and yes now in these days past days a wife’s circle just played as a circle within a husband’s circle and not an equal circle always of some overlapping, and unavoidable co-action.

EXTRA! EXTRA! – CONFESSIONS OF A…

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 2:23 am

How to hold on, how to hold on to loyalty.

Once upon a time…EXTRA!  EXTRA!  EXTRA!

"YOU PROVIDE THE PICTURES AND I’LL PROVIDE THE ‘WAR’"?

Jay,  I have to confess, really it seems imperative that I confess and here.

Jay,  I had consumed less than one case of beer in my life until a month before I was to graduate with my BA in Econ from Villanova University.

Jay,  I have to get this off my chest.  Jay,  I don’t think I have ever read anything you have written but maybe one Wall Street Journal wine column found with Google.

Jay,  I guess I should wait to read HOW IT ENDS until I have at least "popped a cork" with you or read BRIGHT LIGHTS, BIG CITY.

Jay,  I just woke this morning to social media of Facebook news to find a posting from an not necessarily "officially Petra" Petra Nemcova link, and with a new status of "single."

Guys:  Do you buy the wine of Jay’s celebration none / some / occassionally / regularly / often / always?

Gals:  Ditto.

Mad women:  See I was busy, by choice, and choice to paddle up stream more than needed, to be working with power tools and ladders and fine skill honing for a better neurology for future marketing and strategizing.  I had a goal in mind, I seemed to have willing accomplices for greater good from positive change.  I had time, and interests.   I was also into bicycling distances at least as regular thought, and such thoughts of needing quick and agile reflexes and especially in city traffic, and Yale students who still seem to cross New Haven streets often without looking but for pack movement, somewhere.

"YOU PROVIDE THE PICTURES, AND I’LL PROVIDE THE WAR."?

Now the core, the rotten core of "Hillary" – dinasour of the sound bite era, now stuck, tarred, and waist deep in a new more honest and agile era?

"IN THE RACE, OF HOPE, WHO GETS THE BILL?"

NOTE:  David Ogilvy seems to have an interesting biography.  I flipped through it a year maybe ago without buying.  Mine, and of and around same ambitions was to be at least as interesting, yet more from just trying to learn as much in as short a period from as many as I could while synthesising to and with my maternal grandfathers career in marketing and advertising and his still "live" network/wiring even with him in retirement.  After all marketing is supposed to be best with better understanding, not just "pop" and "tease"?

NOTE:  And, then how funny to find myself in my near college years actually a rough and finish carpenter on Block Island - of the Town of New Shoreham - building and finishing much of Jonathan Rhinehart’s "mansion" on Mansion Beach, and especially when news of Adams and Rhinehart moving into Ogilvy Matther.  Too cliche?  Too "clickish"?

Confession:  Right!  I am a cyclist again of distance riding, not yet as much just city roads, so now yes, I was never a smoker.   Do you know already I can call myself a bike mechanis, a rough carpenter, a finish carpenter, a contractor (in past), a cabinet/furniture maker, one of honed electrical skills, one of established plumbing skills, a tiler, a mason of some minor brick and block laying and concrete forming,  yes - a writer (mostly political),  I deny a painter, can cook, can rebuild boats and rig for racing (and have),  have been recognized for conceptual thinking and yes that was a goal in years of construction building first in my thoughts and at times with designing, customly.   I don’t know how to make booze, or vino.   And so all this while a muse with a long unpublished resume, but now with a blog.  I think I still have golf skills, but have had clubs in closet most of past three years after finally getting some into golf just a few years before while getting out of sailing, and back then into some swimming.  Ahh, the dog days of August.