7/28/2010

REDICULOUS? PETRONA(S)?

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 3:48 pm

From such?  From whom?  To what?  To such?

Speaker Pelosi, have they all missed the top story?

Speaker Pelosi, how are you "prepped" for tomorrow?

Are you ready for the more important story for before the Friday news dump before the start of August?

(note:  I think I have to rethink the title for this column.  Sure "Serious Black" was inspired around a real godfather figure a union electrician and so daily of concern for the series and serious and parallels especially in hot black(s) (wires).  Sure Petronas Towers were under construction and supervision of electric installations by architects also involved as construction managers, while spells being cast, Scottish.  But, here?  Now?  And, for a discussion of Speaker Pelosi for numerous casting with "Clinton ran a surplus — therefore vote for Obama?)

Maybe justice less rediculous?

Are we best schooled at such mile marker towards mid-term elections to remember even just one of times Speaker Pelosi, alone, stated to concerned voters that they should cast their vote for Obama and because Clinton ran surpluses?

Is the most important lesson now that the Clintons’ SURPLUSES were grossly irresponsible?  And even "negligent"?  Was it not even "representation" of American electorate to go past "balanced budget" within such a small window of eight years?

Is it "historical" and not just mere "opinion" now that America and world had fears that our budgets and deficits were out of control near the start of Clintons’ eight years, and yet still without, but politicians seeing chance for record popularity, Washington being called to unfund and underfund towards well past "balanced budget" to near a trillion too much cut just to be popular for never expected and thought impossible "surpluses"?

What was the message from Speaker Pelosi about surpluses as reason to elect Obama to Presidency?   How does the magic of that message jive, historical or logically?  Did the Clintons’ White House buy off New York politicians more naturally from years of climbing for "Hillary" to get New York Senate seat?  How is it, again, that we are not facing hearings for a "Senator Rangel"?

Rediculous?  

Speaker Pelosi are not the Clintons’ surpluses a greater story heading into weekend Friday news dump just before start of August, and with President Obama of now "historically" of having attempted to plan spending enough in Washington to create and lock in spending out near or past ten years and with such purposefully deep into deficit spending and such to quite nearly take control of spending away from future presidents, as such was of President Obama, though elected on "Clintons ran surpluses —vote for Obama" actually trying to lock in more spending than any additional revenues would likely leave available for future presidents to allocate otherwise?

How did the spell work?   Because the Clintons did the unthinkable, and thought impossible, and such now specifically, in hindsight, quite rediculous, to irresponsible of not being honest with American voters with more reasonable like "we are back from the brink of never ending deficits…if surpluses are possible too we should take at least a decade to move slowly into such to make sure we are not trying to do too much too quickly and without enough regulation and/or oversight or metric"?

Speaker Pelosi, you seem a big fan of Clintons’ "surpluses" and yet a big fan of President Obama trying to plan far more deficit spending and with efforts to attempt to plan and lock in such excessive deficit spending deep into future president(s) terms.   Was/is it fair even just to consider such trying four years of deficit spending from such start, and even without considering how much more spending he was attempting and with locks out near and past ten years, from even just his first year of first term?

Speaker Pelosi, have they all missed the top story?

Even that Representative Rangel is now in "hot seat" and not for some reason as "Senator Rangel" and Senator Kerry deciding it ethical to fork over near half a million in taxes on his new yacht to the residents of Massachusetts, isn’t it still more newsworthy now heading to controversial mid-term elections that the Clintons’ SURPLUSES are the root problem to some/much if not all of not yet "litigated" as "necessary" spending being "sold" by President Obama?   That it was irresponsible to "negligent" to have gotten exited to prove the thought impossible could be done instead of showing prudence and restraint in budgeting with a calm and cautious selling of slowly moving to some surplus over the next ten years and with what they did in one year maybe enough for the first entire ten years?

Speaker Pelosi, were not there dams, levies, roads, bridges, wetlands, locks, school books, body armor, border security, and more specifically even schools that were "critical" but ignored and avoided for the "popularity" of proving the impossible could be done and done again, and again to yet another unwise ’surplus’?

Didn’t that judge on MR GO (Mississippi River Gulf Outlet) deciding on fault of USA around Katrina disaster rule that all presidents back to 1983 were "grossly negligent" for not funding the needed Army Corp of Engineers to repair and upgrade MR GO?

Didn’t a bridge and more collapse that were on "condemned" or near condemned lists for federal attention, and yet the Clintons still popular for their irresponsible and rash years of surpluses and such hardly touching the full extend of responsibilities from cutting out a trillion just for surplus popularity – of doing the thought impossible?

Rediculous?  

Speaker Pelosi?

7/27/2010

MOTH-BALLED — STRIKING

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 10:51 am

Really,  you should be careful to discuss as "opinion" what is more "historical"?  Passe?

Take this:

~~DRUMS ROLL~~

CREDITS FLOW, IN,

LOCK, STEP, CANALS;

THE ANCIENT BEAT,

 OF A RETIRED DRUMMER.

CAME AND PASSED,

HIS TUNE FLOWS;

CENTURIES OVER,

LEONARDO, LEONARDO.

NATURE’S FORCES,

PUSHING,

PULLING,

FLOWING….

IMMACULATE,

EXPLODING;

ETERNAL,

EXPLORING.

THAT I SEE

IT’S A BIRD,

IT’S A - A WHAT?

HUMANS FLYING?

I DID THAT!  ALMOST?

NATURE’S FORCES,

COME AND PASS…

EXPLORING….

MINDS—

EXPANDING,

SHIFTING,

FLOWING….

A RETIRED DRUMMER,

THE ANCIENT BEAT,

LOCK, STEP, CANALS,

CREDITS FLOW, ON….

BELOVED FORCES,

NATURE’S FORCES;

IMMACULATE

EMPATHIC.

SONS,

OF GENIUS,

 DAUGHTERS,

TOO!

HEAVEN’S BUILDERS,

SCREWS,

ARCHING,

RENAISSANCE!

TRAGIC, NOT!

NATURE’S FORCES…

IMMACULATE!

EXPLODING!

FRIENDS,

BUILDERS,

PAINTERS,

FAMILIES….

CHALLENGING OUR

BELOVED FORCES;

EXPLORING OUR

NATURAL FLOWS.

          BY ME, J.P.Hogan c. 91-92

HISTORICAL (not mere opinion) AROUND SUCH:  YES, AFTER SHARING THIS ONE WITH THE NEW YORK TIMES A DAN BROWN WAS IN MY HEAD ASKING FOR PERMISSION TO USE MUCH OF SUCH, AND SUCH I HAD NO DESIRE TO USE SO MYSELF PAST ITS OBSCURING ON SUBJECT POTENTIAL HERE.  YES, I REMEMBER FORMER PRES. OF HARVARD SUMMERS’ COMMENTS ON FEMALE MATH GENIUS LACKING, AND JUST RECENTLY.  I DIDN’T MENTION THAT RICHARD C. LEVIN MAYBE LOOKS BACK AND REMEMBERS LABOR DAY 1991 AS A DAY BUT FOR HIS WIFE PROMPTING/ENCOURAGING HIM TO CROSS THE STREET AS A DAY TO REMEMBER AS "BUT FOR SUCH - I WOULDN’T HAVE BECOME PRESIDENT OF YALE, AND MOVED HIGHER THAN DEAN OF ECON DEPT." 

OK, SOME OPINION — BUT IT WAS HIS CROSSING AS TO CROSS TO ENGAGE ME IN DISCUSSION AT HIS WIFE’S ENCOURAGEMENT OF WHICH I SPEAK AND SPEAK FRESH ON SPINNING WITH THEM, COINCIDENTALLY FOR SOME MILES, THIS PAST SATURDAY, ON A LOCAL RAIL TO TRAILS BIKE + PATH.  IT IS ALSO FACT THAT THE CURRENT PRESIDENT OF WELLESLEY COLLEGE, USED TO LIVE ACROSS FROM ME AT SUCH TIME IN HISTORY, AND THOSE WERE YEARS I WAS CLOSER IN FRIENDSHIP TO PRESIDENT OF BRYN MAWR.   LABOR DAY 1991 HAD ME ALREADY IN CONTACT WITH REP. GEPHARDT’S OFFICE ON MATTERS OF CONCERN FOR NATION AND ECONOMY, AND PRESIDENTIAL POLITICS, AND AS A CONNECTICUT S-CORP OWNER OF HANDS ON AND JUST CONTRACTING IN HOME IMPROVEMENTS AROUND NEW HAVEN. 

IN THIS POEM IS A STUDY OF MY ASSISTANCE, AND FOCUSED AROUND RECENTLY OF HELPING DESIGN (SOME) AND CONSTRUCT (MORE/MUCH) OF EXHIBIT ON LEONARDO DA VINCI AT THE LOCAL ELI WHITNEY MUSEUM, NOW MUCH MORE A PRACTICAL LEARNING CENTER.

OPINION:  THIS POEM TITLED  "DRUMS ROLL" IS AN "ECONOMICS" POEM  AROUND PRICE FLUXUATION PER  BARREL/DRUM AND "NATURAL FLOWS"  OF NATURAL CRUDE.   AS SUCH IT IS ALSO SUCH A POEM SENSITIVE TO THE ECONOMICS OF THE MIDDLE EAST AND MEANT  SUCH TO ANCHOR "THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM" AS ITS LAST POEM/CHAPTER.

HISTORICAL: 

7/26/2010

DRAFT - BABES OF BAY?

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 2:11 am

Is it time for our loosely affiliated confederate republic of states to flex themselves with "micro" drafts, nearer hops and balance of original recipe of federalist consumation prudence?

Have the days of Washingtonian "work ethic" and thrift soured?

Is it "macro" "Obaminations" calling us to drafts, federalist, more original and local?

Especially now with "Wikileaks" serving up like: "Hillary - BABY KILLER!!!"  and without a cave for her to hide in.

To govern so or to govern anew/again confederated of micro-brewing?

How can we not now progress prudently towards a necessary ressurection of "work ethic" needed with new jobs for there to be new jobs and while Obaminations settling flat and unfiltered, and cloudy with "green" think?   Too much "carbon guilt" even in plugging in your vacuum, in plugging in your power washer?

"HILLARY - BABY KILLER!!!"?   President Obama needs a new Sec. of State?  Was it just $500 billion "Hillary" just gave the Pakistani establishment, or was it actually just $500 million we could have spend on American boardwalks and schools?  America could go "greener" with more hop in its steps by extending existing bike paths across our states, even in Connecticut and its "Rail to Trails".  Yes, adding more bike trails would help cyclists keep "hops" in their steps as well as stroller pushers, pedestrians - afoot, and even roller-bladers, and, such.

The way forward to jobs now necessarily a burden for our state legislatures and governors and their now so globally connected citizens/residents and their business and entreprenuerial spouting?   States as "micro-breweries" for jobs and culture, anew, again more "original" American?  How to make each of our "loose" states more competitive and attractive for the soul and character of its environs/characters?

"HILLARY - BABY KILLER!!!"?

"OBAMA - KILLER OF WORK ETHIC!!!"?

"OBAMA - MACRO SOCIALIST!!!"? 

"OBAMA - THE NEW JFK!"?

Your brand of beer here:_____________________________________

Your interpretation of original drafts:_________________(please share vocally/orally with the person nearest you.)

NOTE:  Basic economics of old work ethics devastated as well by Obama/Clinton such that their "stimulus" and "recovery" cases having fallen flat as uninspired really about their recipe as actually a recipe for such a disaster.   Their brand of socialism has checks at our national level so consecrated and long rededicated to prevent, and prevent with a reverence to the human condition in such a confederate republic "under God"!   You cannot usher and serve up a socialist revolution for our United States of America under a producer code barring amazingly such with a basis of federal revenue in income and profit taxation — you could/may though attempt such at state and local levels with basis in brewing around wealth and property and immediate reflections and decidings nearer known "haves and have nots." 

"OBAMA - KILLER OF WORK ETHIC!!!"?

"OBAMINATION":___________________________(Tell the person nearest you.)

"BABES OF GREEN SUMMER"  a better draft/edition?

"NOT ‘GREEN’ TO CREATE JOBS!"?

"PARCHED ARIZONA, ROCKS - FEDERALISTS!!!"?

"GULF OF OIL, STILL GULF OF OIL JOBS?"?

7/22/2010

DEFT DRAFT?

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 2:14 pm

Surely, even "Hillary" amounting to New York Senator also arguably political nepotism.

How can it be writ away other?  How can history not discuss and color how Senator Hillary Clinton was clearly attempting acquiring a Senate seat in a State that knew PRESIDENT CLINTON was moving to as the most powerful political figure in America, and not to tolerate any/many of posturing effected "RETIRED" status?  How can historians not question in the "but for" and "who you know" lay of such position acquiring and around knowledge that PRESIDENT CLINTON was to stay and stay around establishment of a new political machine around his "office as former president" and his GLOBAL foundation politicing?   How but to offer the "only because of…" and what with PRESIDENT CLINTON so to securing his own power in and around New York and of far more power than any one Senator should ever be able to rest.

Yet the story today is more President Obama not being more popular than President Clinton.

Deft drafting, Mr. President?  

Mr. President, are you past your told of practice of your having brought in presidential historians, seemingly regularly, in your first year to tell you how well they could portray you and your presidency, still?

Mr. President, do you feel like a Tour de France cyclist fouled?

Are you smarting and angry that Bill and Hillary are sprinting past you and after your year and a half doing the hard work of covering for them and their "8"?

Are you, Mr. President, now of inviting historians to The White House to discuss your anger and disappointment in the Clintons together and their disloyalty?

Do you have historians offering you the real plot line of your history of now unpopular most, and foremost, for having put such "cover-up" for the Clintons’ "8" has near your highest priority, and how now they are more popular than you only because you so dedicated your first year and a half to covering up for them and especially with your loud statements encouraging the discouraging of any to "relitigating" such past?

Sure Alberto Contador had a reasonable expectation from his view point with Andy Schleck with derailed chain to have presumed to even assumed Andy such a pro that such should only take him a couple seconds to fix, right?

But the Clintons v. you, Mr. President just seems as foul as the betrayal by Clintons of years of Bush family embracing them, though not nearly (maybe, maybe not) as much as you.

Are your current historians suggesting you by allowing the Clintons such advantage have so cost yourself way more political power than maybe any past president for another? 

Gosh, your allowing them the protection of your draft now has America confused around socialism and now with summer debates able to reach to comparisons and contrastings, and even to a ponderance around "how do we tax or sieze wealth of Russian billionaires" for fair redistribution in an era our Secretary of State should be doing more collecting than giving?  Are not these the years America would have had the greatest advantage towards greater participatory giving by rich peoples of other nations, but for you leaving "Hillary" to try to buy herself some new popularity?

Did Contador see Andy’s chain and think like well the other Schleck could fix it in just a couple seconds >>> time to get going and get out of his way so he has the space to …?

Mr. President is it now beyond "deft drafting" you find yourself so "less popular" and now with your attempting a "cover-up" for the Clintons your looming largest political fault, and so with you maybe even grateful the Republicans with their "no" posture did keep you from making the economics and debt the twice as bad you seemed hell bent towards?

Mr. President how are your historians offering draft to get around such and how such so challenging for your policies while attempting such a "cover-up" have blatantly been in practice of doing the opposite of what the Clintons actually did and while calling it "necessary" to be reversing so much that the Clintons "8" was of?

Still best to go to early and original drafts in times as these?  Time to reboot the Constitution and reverse direction away from global buffoonery rising around discussions of "good socialists" and "bad socialists"?

Mr. President you must be smarting with them getting all the "popularity" from all your work, right? 

Daft draft?

  

DAFT NEPOTIC!

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 2:04 am

Stepping back — stepping away?   What is the collatoral assessment/fallout?

How now we pine for "just say no" days of Reagan wizardry?   What Bush?

Well oiled an aged concern, anew wrenching.

Just a "wench"?  Matrimonial bliss?  Wrenching for the "man"?

Stepping back — stepping away?   What are just some of correlations of posture nepotic?

While driving down the street one day a bliss wafted.

While walking down the street one day some traffic congested.

While cycling down the streets all days great vigilance for bliss, wise.

Stepping back — stepping away?   Oh, her history, and, her bias compromised nepotic.

Drafting right, drafting left — daft our Secretary of  State and her political math skills?

Drafting right, drafting left — Summers’ math still of congested posture daft?

Drafting right, drafting left — "Pimped the ride!"?   Madam Sec. Mrs. William J. Clinton?

Stepping away — stepping back?   And: Clintons "two-fer" nepotic and intimate monolith.

How now we pine for "just say no" days of Reagan wizardry?  What Bush?

Well oiled an aged concern, anew wrenching.

Just a "wench"?  Matrimonial bliss?  Wrenching for the "man"?

Stepping away — stepping back?   "Hillary" of political ascent in "nepotism" intimate?

Good socialist but only with Americans’ wealth and/or income and profits?

Good socialist yet so with manifesto incoherent in undrafted and checked aires?

Good socialist not too too too bad except USA getting trapped to "pay for it all"?

Stepping away — stepping back?   "Hillary’s" math of Summers’ daft math posture, ivy?

Conundrum!   Sec. Clinton necessarily "nepotic" and of daft nepotism prosecuting.

Conundrum!   Sen. Clinton hardly not "nepotic" — undemocratic, machined figurehead?

Conundrum!   FLOTUS Clinton slimed by Obama’s numbers, w/ "Bill", more than O?

Stepping away — stepping back?  Time to "litigate" the Clintons’ 8, finally — BIASED?

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

CONCLUSION:    So years of excesses, but not excesses in regulation, but excesses towards greater tempting, and with farce of "unfunding and underfunding" SAFE course.   Sure our 22nd Amendment seems writ towards embrace of legalese as "poetic" and "romantic" and "holding" as sensual and sexual for and intimate in FLOTUS or FMOTUS (First Mistress).   Some wisdom still parts so "holding" of "holding…" to remind and part posture, intimate and human in the careful writs of our term limits amendment.   As Hillary imparts Afghanistan politics not as the opium elephant in the room but visually a tease or posture ponderance with graphic "hell-man" and when not usually the "or" of "can-get-hard" nuancing of Afghan southern province diplomatic…   Who is responsible for such separate regions/provinces/gerrymandering, Afghan?  Biden? 

Yes our 22nd Amendment specifically uses english in prose to poetry near matching the matching writs of standard marriage vows.   But, Kandahar (can-get-hard?) and Helmand (Hell-man?) hardly the real concern in "Hillary" NEPOTIC of intimate posture and daft past 8 of biased to near racism with shared hosting as FLOTUS not wrenching their "official State policies" as "pro-Sunni" and largely anti-Shia, especially Iraqi Shia?

A "no-confidence vote" against President Barack Hussein Obama is even more condemning to both Clintons?  How counter?   Clearly not a "dumb broad" hurrah!  Seemlessly more just a woman smart for another time?  Summers’ math?

And so with Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton as expendable and fireable as Shirley Sherrod, right?   And with more merit?   Are we past the hype yet?

And so how can we be "proud socialists" at home with "Hillary math" not of a taxing/taking for fair redistribution by also the "Most number of billionaires of living in Moscow" and as well the richest five percent of Mexicans obviously not paying the amount needed to cover all Mexicans such that their subjects are fleeing to be a ______________ to Americans?   "Hillary" a bad "socialist"?   "Hillary" ascent litigateable as "nepotism" to "nepotic"?   How not with luxury of FLOTUS full security and safety blanket especially to abuse to "pomp and circumstance" faux granduer of "earned" yet "not" in appearance of "run" wrought for New York Senate seat? 

She’s pimped our "State", our ride?

7/18/2010

REPUBLICANS ARE TRYING TO GET TO HELL?

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 10:59 am

What are the assumptions too many are still working with?

How many Americans now have far more knowledge of facts that before 2008 elections they were led to vote counter to, counter to as public opinion has been spread to favor decidings based on fewer facts?

Compassionate conservatism a farce?  And even though both General Motors and the oil industry tended to have been more socialist before President Obama "saving"? 

So going "green" in our United States of America has now become a champion over Spain in contest of statistics:  USA beats Spain in going green agressiveness and has it having cost near three oil or automotive jobs for (to four or five) for each "green car" job. ???

So what are we to believe now about the Republicans?  What are they?  Who are they?

Are they "evil job killing socialists" acting globally too as well of those the progressive Obama/Clintons and Democrat Congress acting also extra-Constitutional on liberal theory and global socialist reaching?  Can we really be sure?

How?

What are Republicans today?  Who are Republicans today?

{note:  It is vitally important that any reading this also have read previous column and a few before as well.}

Mid-term elections call all for a new deciding, and now of so much better informed especially around realities around Middle East and jobs that Clintons more than Obama have tried to disguise.

Republicans are trying to get to Hell?  Are you a believer?  Isn’t that how the Democrats are trying to get you to judge Republicans as political leaders?

Republicans of the party of Lincoln, at all - still?

Isn’t it the socialists that try to destroy God, historically?

{note:  I mean it, you really should have read at least the past three columns here and hopefully all 227 columns from my first year of blogging at www.jphogan.org on commentary/blog page now "un-hidden" again for a short time.   Are you one of the near 100,000 visits to jphogan.org in its first year?}

So we now face mid-term elections and with a Democrat Party so "out of the closet" of Socialist garb and soul.   Now though that we know we have admitted socialists governing as American Democrats how are we to work to decidings now around new and old issues involving Middle East conflicts and policies?

Are these Socialist American Democrats acting extra-Constitutionally to support anew a "RESETING" in Middle East (Muslim World?) to getting Ba’athists back on track towards a creation of a single Socialist Arab State?   I am glad I dug out my signed copy of ARAFAT, Terrorist or Peacemaker by notable English journalist Alan Hart, and especially for its history of birth of Ba’athist party towards such Socialist reaching and of explaining the name of such party translates as "renaissance" or "resurrection."   But to base decidings this November on just such can not be scholarly since such was mostly written on early 80’s intel.

So let’s discuss Iraq!   Saddam of prosecution, finally, by Bush admin, of the same party as got its start towards the creation of a united Socialist Arab State.   Saddam, whom Clintons, the now ‘out of the closet’ Socialists, were willing to let return to power was a Ba’athist and grew to power and rank in a slightly altered for his and others personal power ambitions and with Saddam rising as an assassin.

So let’s discuss Iraq!  Saddam?  Was he favored by Clintons and Democrats trying to argue against "Operation Iraqi Freedom" or at least to letting the Ba’athists though historically, in Iraq, a minority group governing tyrannically and oppressively, and because he was of a party whose origins were in spreading socialism to all Arabs?

So let’s discuss Iran!   If Saddam was favored by Clintons and that explains why they nearly let him out completely from United Nations Sanctions and especially those calling for better governance for Iraqi people and greater civil rights, then why though did Clintons yet make a show of sanctions on him for possessing still WMD and leave such unresolved as the inheritance they left President Bush?   Did they just love the Ba’athist loyal to the origins of such party and not see away to move such party and its ambitions out from around Saddam Hussein?

So let’s discuss Iran!   Seems now like Saddam Hussein was a new Stalin, and, Iran of a new Hitler?  A scholarly stretch?   A useful coloring?   Saddam actually looked like Stalin didn’t he and maybe with such from effort, right?   So Republicans, American Republicans that Democrats have been fighting especially around Middle East policies are what?   Republicans are not supporters of a single Socialist Arab State but of a willingness to "stand with" to help "small folk" (as seen by superior socialist party members?) to "regular Arab Munibs" towards helping other people find wisdom worth attempting to copy in our foundation of laws around federalism?

So let’s discuss Iran!  Shouldn’t Republicans be greater friends to Iran even though more a "Hitler" once against a "Stalinist Saddam"?   So Iran is largely a nation of Aryans not quite Hitler’s Aryans, and likely less "socialist" than Saddam Hussein, right?   So should America have let Patton march on Russia after end of WWII?  

Republicans are trying to get to Hell?  >>> Isn’t that how the Democrats are trying to mold your decidings, still?   Weren’t the Republicans of oil and automotive jobs and such as an industry with decidings "less green" of creating jobs and work for people across the Middle East regardless of their "socialist party" affiliation/opinions?

Stalin tried to kill God to all Soviet subjects and but for Hitler would have finished building on the grounds of that Christ Church he had torn down for his TOWER to be the tallest in the world and so with a figure of Stalin himself on top.  (source:  Cities Of The Underworld recently viewed hour on USSR subway and tunnels…) (Wasn’t aware what a splendid subway system Moscow subjects traverse until such show.)

So do we now know to look to base our political decidings this fall around Democrats as for spreading socialism across the Middle East and pining for days once thinking they would still have more help from Iraqi Ba’athists?

Do we now know to look to base our mid-term decidings around Republicans in more favorable understanding once thwarted by Dems campaignings around 2008 now able to be summed more to Dems being of trying to thwart efforts to defend capitalism as a historically superior system than socialism/communism?   Republicans as ‘evil capitalists’ that though showed compassion in Middle East with willingness to stand by all Iraqi people and majority of Iraqi people to help them create their own federalist republic and without being forced to become a "copy" of America?

So Iran once could be thought to be trying to be the hero that defeated Stalin in Saddam form?   Is Iran on board with Dems efforts to still be anti-Republican and of efforts to spread their socialism to Iran too?

What are the assumptions too many are still deciding with?

What now with Dems "green revolution" causing 2-4 oil and auto industry job loss and to have greatly cost Middle Easterners more such jobs and for a long time if India and China were not now of creating enough demand for their resources such that even Republicans can compassionately lobby for more efficient vehicles?  

What now that Republicans that kept vehicle standards lower than needed such that more peoples around the world and especially Americans had jobs can conscientiously support "going green"?

Are we not safer now with American Socialist Dems decidings - especially in Middle East?

Or are all those in the Muslim World and/or Arab world of "anti-capitalism" supporting for spreading of socialism even as of origin of Saddam’s Ba’athist party to a single Arab Socialist State?

I need some new intel.  Anyone?  Anyone?

{note:  The interesting and even neet thing about my being on strike as long as "Hillary" officially involved, and as per economy and jobs, is that I can be an objective reporter/blogger and even journalist without compromising my strike.   I will have to work to figure out who and what "Republicans" are today, now more, though.}

7/17/2010

WRENCHING GORE

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 2:32 am

Which wars have been unnecessary. Which sanctions were handled by amatuers?

Is it ironic that with progressives to full blown out of the closet socialists now in power with union message and policies that I find myself still on strike against them?  Is it just sad that I have been on strike, rightly, re: economy, since Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton announced her entrance into our presidential contests?

What is it that I so strike still and against Obama administration proudly as long as "Hillary" remains in his cabinet and as well as long as he keeps playing false blame game around "all the fault of Bush’s eight years"?  A principled strike?  Irony? Prudent?

Prudence:  Knowing that by staying on such a principled strike re: Clintons, we are safer for my not letting her have access to my portfolio of work around positive change and spreading of equal rights more equally, than we would be letting her again misuse what there may be in such?

Game changer:  That the book GAME CHANGE told the "Hillary" story inaccurately? That such political book falsely presents "Hillary" has just an First Lady who realized after such eight years that it would be neet to be the first female president, as if it was just some after thought.  See, I have known since early 70s that the charm to "Bill and Hillary" to "Hillary" was that Bill kept her believing they could both/each become president some day and even if he went first. And on top of that early awareness from them polling me when near a first grader at play in New Haven on specifically that:  Around 1997 a professing at Harvard Kennedy School friend in women in politics studies was of telling me she was party to preparing for a "Hillary run for president".

America doesn’t know "Hillary" the way I know Hillary and doesn’t know my part/story in there rise and election in 1992 as partly told in recent columns here.  I disagree with her politics and governance enough too, even though many of their successes in their eight years were after assistance from my strategizing.

Yes, Obama got near half of the Hollywood dollar total "Hillary and Bill" thought they had a lock on, and likely more as "anti-Clinton" > "Clintons are big liars" pulling of support.

Yes it is absurd that "Hillary" is now involved in any "sanctions" in Middle East after her intimacy in the eight years of Clintons’ "two-fer" administering that avoided a timely prosecution and enforcement of sanctions upon Saddam and Iraq.

Yes it is absurd the "Hillary" is now "believable" on any foreign policy after leaving Saddam with sanctions upon him past their first term containing enough time for Saddam to have complied to beyond all reasonable doubts.

How much more wrenching gore have we been pulled into because of deciding of the REAL "Hillary"? 

How much harder was it to gain confidence of Iraqi in Operation Iraqi Freedom after the entire eight years of Clintons deflating them and their confidence in Americans and The United States as at all just?

How much harder is it still and of wrenching gore in Afghanistan because for the full eight years of Clitons’ "two-fer" administering with inaction and avoidance the norm they didn’t "RETURN" to Afghanistan to restore the brotherhood once established fighting spread of communism?

How much more wrenching gore have our brave involved been faced with because Clintons let Afghanistan and Iraq fester with a growing sense of "abandonment" by The United States?  How many more brave had to die because Clintons avoided timely and called for action to return and further prosecuting especially Saddam and Ba’athists?

Have you already forgotten that even Clintons’ NSC expert Philip Bobbitt wrote in TERROR AND CONSENT of birth of Al Qaeda of having been because of Saddam Hussein, due to Saddam for his invasion of Kuwait? Does it matter that the Clintons left Iraq and Saddam in a condition unsatisfactory to Al Qaeda sense of justice due Saddam Hussein and for all of their eight years, and all of such eight years of holding Middle East leaders to their taken promise to just blame the American Republicans before them, and not them, the Clintons?

Yes we were asked to blame Bush for 9/11 though Clintons’ eight years had obvious policies and inaction and avoidance to blame, specifically, and the Clintons even had their gross unfunding and underfunding of our military and intelligence and infrastructure jobs spending for bridges and schools as well as body armor for troops of modern soldiers.

Yes, Bush may have lied us into "Operation Iraqi Freedom" but not because it wasn’t needed and justifiable but because he would have had to politicize the need otherwise by blaming Clintons and their eight years as part of arguing for need to proceed with Operation Iraqi Freedom, finally.

Yes, 9/11 likely made dealing with Saddam Hussein more difficult for it being near a decade after it should have been an active prosecution of sanctions and war crimes to beyond a reasonable doubt.

Yes, 9/11 likely only of Saddam’s hand for his invasion of Kuwait gave birth to Al Qaeda and their cases of complaints towards "justice" against the full eight years of Clintons. 

President Obama in his Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech spoke well to dangers of "inaction" and "avoidance"!  So what gives?  How is "Hillary" the REAL or just the "presented by media and her handlers" still anywhere near our foreign policies?

She actually has a long record of failures that have led to more wrenching gore for more than just our American brave.

I am through apologizing for having helped make Clintons appear more electable in 1992 race. President Obama you own the Clintons’ failures now.

My strike around the economy continues, proudly.

How do you like that union folk?  Thanks for your support.  The Clintons as management forgot to buy or compensate for the rights to my original work, you and many still think of as theirs, though wrongly.

I do write such confident that I have extricated myself with my strike on economy from complications around wrenching gore deciding. 

President Bush, you are still grateful for my years as concerned citizen voluntarily offering assistance and for publicly arguing for the surge and in defense of such for hard months of such fights?  Secretary Rumsfeld still isn’t smarting from that day hours or day(s) after 9/11 where he seemed to ask of my spirited offering of nuancing assistance of his maybe asking you "if (I) was trying to pull rank on him"?  Hi Condoleezza Rice, "Hillary" is no you.

7/16/2010

WENCH IN THE WORKS

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 6:28 am

It was a curious start.  President Obama had to go toe to toe with a great communist nuclear threat.  President Obama, the new JFK, was seeing history repeat itself but now it wasn’t Cuba, it was North Korea, and he might have to swat them like an ant but with a nuclear strike.

How did it start?  Did Al Gore, private citizen and environmental extremist and radical, intentionally sent private spies to violate North Korea, or did he just fail to educate them as "reporters" in his employ enough?

Well, either way our new young President was being tested and might not be able to bring us back from the nuclear brink Al Gore’s spies/reporters had brought us to.

What a start!  What could possibly happen next?

Oh, gosh, how did we end up with it "Bill’s" BAY OF BABES and our young President Barack Hussein Obama, The Wonderful, and Magical, so desparate that he had to play a trump card to save "Al’s" butt and accept "Bill’s" detentism?

Oh, gosh, how did we come to sending a former President to negotiate a release of two meddlesome private employees of a former Vice President?

BAY OF BABES!

(This is a column in progress, I do not know where it will go next. It will likely be the work of the weekend, yet may stay as is as I have said much else thought to be included here already in threads and comments on politico.com and facebook.com/jpeterhogan.)

(Pretty attrocious the ’slobering’ offer "Hillary" as Obama’s Howard Baker today in New York Times.  Pretty unthinkable, and while her spending hard earned American dollars abroad buying popularity seeming to help economy even less than Obama’s stimulus has as crafted largely by Clintons’ economic loyalists.)

(Past Flushing - Queens column still has need to breath and settle especially since substance in it gets really confusing when looking back at Clintons’ eight years and whether now to blame Clintons still or try to blame only the Republican Congress efforts.)

7/14/2010

PAST FLUSHING - QUEENS?

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 4:43 pm

Over the "salt and pepper bridge" and through the republic of which it stands bridging, oh, and yikes!

Yikes!  Circa 1988: If that/this is how they are professing our Constitutional Law, and now deep into Reagan Revolution, we got some problems.

Yikes!  Law school not the place for me to be as so much foundational positive change was possible for "doers" not trapped in law schools, like say from 1988-1991, like President Obama.  So much opportunity for marketing positive foundational change for those not needing a law degree and years so learning old ways to graduate only to a world of new ways.

How to get enough "range" and practical experience?

How yet?  To be, to be entrepreneurial and in carpentry and home construction and remodeling, and to a tag line for our republic and such opportunities honoring our founding fathers "practicalness" of "carpentry and remodeling services"?

So with windows on Boston and Con Law so professed how not but to continue to the practical study and appreciation seeking of at least Washington and Jefferson, by trying to learn to as many practical skills and trades and books as they had to use and consider while birthing our nation!  Exclamation?

Click click click clack clack clack — metro card or token — trespassing rightly and publicly over "Salt and Pepper" bridge under the Red Line, daily.  

Oh Rehnquist?  More laymen language, you think?  A renaissance in American jurism fitting for our United States of America "resetting" to core once accidental from its purpose and drafting to a becoming to sole superpower in the world?

What to do with the free Bar Review class and book I won at a raffle as a first year law student?  (I think it was at The Red Hat.)  I think I couldn’t pass on "free" course but could give book away.  Hey Chuck Cronin, how are you after all these years?  I haven’t found you on facebook like other old classmates.

I had much earlier decided I wanted to be "just like" Arthur M. Menadier, a Madison Ave top ad exec of running the Johnson & Johnson accounts for near 25 years until he retired in 1971 to having much time to spend with, me, with me just one of many of his grandsons.  Today, many know his era as MadMen show of those years, yet of less "responsible" accounts, so I hear.

Much method in my madness, and so much still little known or well considered even for the increased circulation for the New York Times during those years I fed political poetry to columnists to encourage op-ed and editorial spin for positive change considerings, global.  Hey, New York Times, I have been meaning to check, still, to see if even that was the last time you saw a rise in your newspaper circulation.  Thanks with going with my "objectivity" on first days of coverage then the day after first day of Democratic Party Convention with Clinton headlining.  I cannot forget A. M. Rosenthal’s (I think I remember correctly) noting like "wow: four in one (poem)" as for the one poem I sent with four separate columns/points encouraging.

So Governor Clinton did less to defeat President Bush than Perot and less still than President Bush did towards his own defeat.

So President Bush may have been afraid of "taking the heat as did Lincoln" and around considerations of a re-electing, and so before Senator Al Gore acted more parliamentary with his pronouncement and declarations to "President Bush deserves a second term" like coronating.  So?

And so how?  How so to as "King George" was meant derogatively, regularly?   Did you ask? 

So Senator Al Gore decided President Bush deserved a second term and opted out of checking public opinion with a fair challenge?  Did you ask?  

Did you read KINGS OF THE HILL?   Did you read Cheney’s query to wondering on considerations about fate of Bush?

Did you read?:

"What would happen then to the civil rights of ex-slaves?"

"Beyond that, who had given the president the right to determine the terms of Reconstruction?  Stevens wasn’t alone in thinking the matter belonged to Congress and in resenting executive excursion."

Did you ask?  Did you realize even yet that such concern over "reconstruction" in a era of exiting Iraq without undermining global justice and democracies/freedoms was a new "Reconstruction" and that Cheneys’ thoughts here quoted provided the way to defeat President Bush?  But for Bush being afraid of being re-elected defeating himself, sort of.  Have you wondered that President Clinton and the Dems may not have realised such until just now, or here abouts?

Our Constitution seemed to need a more basic professing then, and maybe now still.   Too complicated legalese to much of "establishment" renditions seemed a reasonable risk/danger.

Yes, we should still consider there was advantage to be gained by Saddam Hussein if he could "fight back" and even with a specific targeting of "prosecuting" Bush, right?   It would have involved a global chaos creating, but plays seemed "on the board" and for years into or all the way through the Clintons’ eight years, right?  Was it towards a way to drive America into political chaos and to acting beyond its Constitution and while near ignorant as a nation of peoples about complexity of Saddam’s world and specifically just the Muslim world around him in the Middle East?

Was the best play for such to find a presidential candidate "believable" as a "do nothing president" more content to be more domestic, and so as President Bush might have been able to carry, but only maybe with cooperation of Democrats, then unlikely?   Was Governor Clinton a "natural" for a "do nothing" need for a renaissance for America hardly of his making and character (on foreign policy priorities) in years America wise to follow Cheneys’ wisdom to Congress best to set the terms of any post war "reconstruction"?

Does it matter where "Bill" goes?  Does it matter that Republicans may have duped him and now such of explaining …?

Was it only that Bush feared his own re-electing?  Was it Perot?

If only Bush had spoken without concern when wondering at Lincoln memorial to a ponderance on if he might take the heat as did Lincoln and save a well spread democratizing from unrending even global, in warring, "civil" if to think of Muslim World as one? 

And so THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM was written to swing back national marketing to a confident Bush 41 of "deserving a second term" by election, if he thought his policies and principles didn’t stand a better chance to survive for more without him annointed "King George" anymore?  

First though, America needed to brave-up some Democrats and turn them into first string "respectable" opposition and while most were running away from running against a Republican with 87% popularity. 

The re-making of Governor Clinton was hoped not to have need past November 1992.  He was meant to be able to be flushed but as a "next-time" maybe.   He in so many ways was so wrong for those times and sensitivities.

Yes even in those days wondering on our founding fathers and our republic other than tired ways being taught "standard" around 1988 of Barry Obama seeking and years later when building or remodeling bathrooms and even installing and repairing toilets I was of remembering buying my first copy of United States Building Codes at the Massachusetts State House Bookstore. 

7/13/2010

ON THE HALF SHELLS?

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 2:11 pm

To think I got started in this political writing back in New Haven when Clinton was Governor of Arkansas and a "little known" with little if any foreign policy executive experience. To so remember I think a day in 1990, though maybe 1991 of writing a letter to the editors of the local New Haven Register.  Something had to give.

And so it was June 8, 1991.

And so it was I took to writing and taking a stand for positive change.

And so I would later include a copy of such letter with one of two sent to Representative Richard Gephardt’s DC office as change was happening that would need ‘awareness’ and ‘attention’ in the 1992 presidential race he was last "first string" (previously run with national name recognition) still not to have announced he wouldn’t run.

My home town had its first black mayor being challenged by an Italian American of his own party, and while Mayor John Daniels was still of his first term.

And so I move to pen on June 8, 1991 around "It is getting tiresome to listen to the candidates for mayor speaking of an either/or world, one in which the problems are seen in black and white simplicity.  There is a "new world order" emerging and what it amounts to is that if we, the people of the greater New Haven area, are to survive, let alone prosper in the world economy we have to, out of economic necessity, resolve our differences.  We don’t have to like each other but we do have to learn to respect each other and our different backgrounds.  It is our great cultural diversity in New Haven that already make the city great, regionally."

Something had to give and the local paper was still of an objective standard that meant reporting crimes and news with race or color as part of story.  I thought I had the range and personal history to offer another "objective" standard not as simple as "black and white".

Back that June I started my first letter to the editors ever with "New Haven is a great city, with problems yes, but none that the culturally diverse and talented peoples and businesses of the greater New Haven area can’t address and solve together."

And "Clinton who?" a national norm then? And community policing and comstat still of our future while Chief Bratton then about rebuilding NYC transit policing, the same Chief Bratton I became "wired" with in consideration of ambitions from Boston back around 1988, when I nearly laughed at the most run down police cars, then his new charge, that I had ever seen, and at that they were green and parked around the Mass. State House.

Did you know at the time I wrote a couple letters with national concerns to Rep. Gephardt’s DC office that then George Stephanopoulus was then there employed? 

Well, while reflecting, I lost track of concern of "half shells" of Clintons and how an election of Hillary as President would have posed the greatest risk to our fragile and young democracy in its entire history.

Yes when I wrote the letter to the editor her partly shared I was with a willingness to work to find a new better way for all reporters to write, and write past a "black and white simplicity."  Sort of explains my shift to political poetry sent then over next few years to guide and direct positive change and to encourage writing that could and hopefully would give "room" for changes like Chief William Bratton and Mayor Dinkins were up to.

I wasn’t new to the news world and nor to "exposure" to national press secretaries, like my sister once for Senator Dodd.  See I was exposed to Dem publications and thought and grew concerned that there way and ideas couldn’t and wouldn’t work.  Only now may I finally have convinced my sister.

Yes an election of Hillary for president would have been an never ending game of moving around empty half walnut shells, and a reclassifying of incriminating documents from their full eight years so likely to maximise time with a fresh new thirty years of secrecy where ever possible.

And so I really had been around the news thinking for years and so many that I remember the granddaughters of the then owners of the New Haven Register as my favorite friends around kindergarten and first grades.  And so though but to more mature around 1983 of starting to refer to myself around news "type" as more a "Citizen Rosebud" than depicted "Citizen Kane" and with a meant defense of Hearst legacy.

Oddly it wasn’t for years that I would learn that a columnist for the BLOCK ISLAND TIMES named Joseph V. Connolly Jr. whose father once ran Hearst around time of setting in CITIZEN KANE, and from my friend Joseph V. Connolly Jr. that his father was of the first graduating class from the New Haven public school I not only attended but grew up living directly across from.

Yes, and election of Hillary would have posed a grave danger to our still yound democracy and republic and of them acting in character, already known, likely, to work to hide documents from public view and not just in their socks.

What we know certain is how even without her "election" it was a fight, tooth and nail, with "smoke and mirrors" to get an "appearance" that "necessary" records were looked at fully by President Obama prior to "Hillary" becoming Secretary of State.  Oh, how they really could have reworked so many records so that they became secured anew for thirty years from public scrutiny?  Yikes, that rates as a threat to our democracy for real.

And so back to June 8, 1991 and concerns that with "first black mayors" maybe being defeated with cities with many problems, I set to writing to effect positive change by leading.

Such day as that I work to close my short letter with "To prepare for and adapt to the new world order we need the agility of youth, the ability to think and move freely and thus learn quickly. Our age old ways may no longer be appropriate to the new world order."

It was a letter to the editors that didn’t respond to any specific article or news covered, and got played with by staff writers without getting published. 

And so I was with my start, and my start from a New Haven Public elementary school mentioned with Hearst history, of then with near 70 nations with foreign student attending and many but not all for being a grad student haven for Yalies with children.

Clinton who?  Yup, that was back then the national norm and all the while a lesser known Barry Obama without even having written his first book, or maybe just without it yet published or on more than Harvard COOP shelves.

Above, when I mentioned having written political poetry for few years to encourage and guide positive change that though was mostly directly to the then posse of New York Times op-ed columnists, including Russell Baker and Anna Quindlan.  I believe I remember correctly as well that Joseph V. Connolly Jr. had been an upper classman to Russell Baker maybe at school in Baltimore area and even a elder fraternity brother.  This collection still covered and titled THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM and as it still stands as a collection organized once towards such. 

Don’t know why President Obama declared we needed "a new foundation" and so condemned most of what took decades of building until he took most of it apart. 

Have to think much of it was "Hillary’s" fault, and sadly for still putting protecting her man above protecting Americans.

APPLAUD! APPLAUD!

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 3:19 am

(Reposted here after pre-view for couple days as "facebook note" to facebook friends…  It has been edited and revised to better fit this space/medium.)

It seems they have gotten bolder this week. It seems that all the eithicists must take the month of July and maybe August off from Washington, at least those available to Democrats. Did you hear Howard Dean brag about how their lies about "the economy is all Bush’s fault" has been told enough that polls are showing "a majority" of those polled "agreeing" with "economy is all Bush’s fault" or words like such? Howard Dean didn’t say the part as I just was saying of being happy that they had told their lies enought that people were now accepting them as "truth".

Just bold and very illogical.

I cannot applaud, Mr. President.

Mr. President, it seems it can be logically said that you are lying.  Ignorance, or incompetence may yet be your only other "excuse" - other than "lying".

Mr. President that you even attempt saying economy and deficits are now the fault of Bush’s eight years and with a Clinton in your cabinet does add credence to "incompetent" and also, though, to "lying".

Everybody else:  This now seems to hurt both Clintons even more than both Obamas or even just President Obama as if "all the fault of Bush’s eight years" then, and with "Afghanistan a necessary war", so then necessary that Bush years and spending were all the fault of the Clintons’ eight years.  If Afghanistan is now so "a necessary war" then "9/11" in no way can be said to be Bush’s fault, and, so the spending out of "surplus" and into deficits after 9/11 is/was arguably and quite so much available for political bias to Bush as then and now "all the fault of the Clintons’ eight years."

So since President Obama has put in out there "on the political table" and not just "campaign season" tables what are we to do with the conclusion, logical from his recently still held postures?  Can we but now since "Afghanistan is a necessary war" and "economy all the fault of the past eight years of Bush policies" so conclude that 9/11 was necessarily a bad inheritance from Clintons and that Bush should have proceeded post 9/11 only with "all the fault of the past eight years of Clintons’ failed politics and policies, and gross underfunding and unfunding of defense, intelligence and jobs/recovery spending?

>>>"All the fault of Bush’s eight years" logically implies and sums to really, even now in Obama’s four(?), to now also "all the fault of the Clintons’ eight years.

>>>And, yet Hillary Clinton, Madam Secretary of State Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton, is now in the cabinet, Obama’s Cabinet,  of "all the fault of Bush’s eight years."

APPLAUD?

>>> And, yet it was maybe more the "Pelosi Congress" that kept Bush and Congress from putting in more of the spending needed to fix the underfunding and unfunding of the Clintons’ eight years and not just as then in time to save Republicans by 2008 elections but also to save our economy with necessary reversal of other irresponsible budget cuts by Clintons in time so to save economy.

APPLAUD?

Mr. President:  You seem to now have to be an "austerity president" and yet you and your spending and "coziness" with Clintons so far, and so far so so publicly, of now maybe making "selling" such impossible for you, with any "popularity" gain.

>>>Again:  Since Afghanistan is as President Obama said as a "necessary war" then Bush spending after 9/11 also necessary and vital in its reversal of Clintons’ irresponsible "popularity" seeking with "surplus" cuts.  Since "Afghanistan a necessary war" Bush was right to increase spending on military post Clintons’ slashing and cuts but was now maybe just wrong in spending same sums in Iraq instead of in Afghanistan and Pakistan, only.   So Bush/Cheney not "wrong" for deficits from military spending but just for spending any of such needed reversal of Clintons’ surpluses in Iraq instead of just Afghanistan and Pakistan, right?

APPLAUD?

After 9/11 it was necessary and vital to reverse just some probems from Clintons’ eight years that needed to have Bush do more spending than Pelosi Congress would let him, or to reverse all problems?

APPLAUD?

Dems needed voters to believe in Clintons’ surpluses past election day in 2008 even if they were causing, logically, almost all of the problems President Obama and Secretary of State Clinton and eternal campaigner "Bill" have been selling as just "all the fault of Bush eight years"?

APPLAUD?

Problem?  They got bolder and proud with "most Americans agree economy the fault of Bush eight years" and even with such requiring a consideration that if so and so as "intentional" or even just "avoidable" with even just some more spending such as Pelosi Congress wasn’t allowing>>> Then Republicans at fault for Bush’s eight years at fault were then intentionally of working and then administering to "intentionally" and "purposefully" working/campaigning to "lose" Congress and with a such still "avoidable" to losing Congress and The White House in 2008 contests.

>Don’t forget to "follow" on twitter with @jphoganorg and also look for comments and "chiming" on politico.com article threads and ARENA, like today on GOP and K Street article, with comments convenient as "in first twenty."

7/9/2010

TO BE BRIEF - July 9, 2010

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 4:06 am

Seems Washington needs to find and hire "ethicists" to understand my last blogged column.  May need to give them a week or more of not writing another to give them time to comprehend "ethics" involved.  Don’t know how long it has been since there were enough with such skill readily available on Capitol Hill.

Does saying "yellow politics" have the same intonation as "yellow journalism"?

7/8/2010

FLAPPERS AND PHILOSOPHERS

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 3:15 am

Ah, the windows of opportunity, closed?

How much is the doggy in the window?

Have the "politicians" now forced my hand to walk the line to "yellow journalism" as antidote?

What a dilemma, of morality questioning.

What a dilemma so now I face so long involved on more than one side for "positive change" for more than three sides.

What a dilemma I face now without a moral justification to do anymore what I did voluntarily for so long, as no one as top politicians or business leaders have volunteered note and secure the necessary footholds of such for positive change and economic growth.

If selfishness now the established standard and not even President Bush of footnoting in his soon to be released biography, then I have no motivation or moral calling to but match "politics" and "business" norms with maybe even attempting "yellow journalism" as a necessary antidote/standard.

I didn’t do what I did because I wanted to and sought to get to where doing it would take me, and didn’t do it because "leaders" or others said I should. 

Is it now down to whether President Bush footnotes or waxes prosaic?

Is that the only straw left to be the only not short straw left?

Sad is how years where thought "supporting" while actually presenting the last and least and near most undesired result. 

So, now there are fewer and some truer and yet now with paths and walks fewer and more not to be pursued.  A body of work substantial yet of the type one not to volunteer or work to market in mass but without others (not Clintons) volunteering and reaching out.

See, you/they have left me with "it must be a dog" as otherwise you/they would actually be knocking on my door or atleast my inbox. 

Don’t think me a fool to actually ask to mass market such, without demand and/or compatriots. 

See about the only thing you can say I was motivated to find while doing such is an answer to "whom can be trusted." 

So are Democrats inadvertantly returning New York City to being the defacto capital of the world?

I guess I could get a poodle, even in New York.

And today for some reason remembering that there are at least, likely a couple dozen homeowners to many more who every day consider me and home security for having installed new door(s) and locks for them and mostly around DC.

 

7/5/2010

DON’T WALK — WALK

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 6:30 am

So did you have a pedestrian Fourth of July weekend?

Were you an evil consumer of carbon?

Did you hunt, trap, kill, skin and process and ground your own beef, or venison offerings?  Did you serve your own catch, and maybe after collecting and catching your own bait?

Shouldn’t you have?  Isn’t that "going green" that would help Global Warming, global warming that is threatening the lives and habitat of polar bears, supposedly?

Wouldn’t more fish and sea creatures have died since BP well malfunctioning if big government didn’t move to suspend fisher people a right to fish, for fatier fish and such?  I saw/heard on tv last night that American native indians used to used raw crude for medicinal purposes, go figure.  Not even old Castor Oil consumption read. So the fish are surviving and more for fewer on Fourth of July plates and platters?

Did you walk the mile to the store for your party rations?  Did you ride a bike with a basket?

Did you put oil on your salad alone or just with vinegar and other delicasies? 

Global Warming alarmisms all bunk?  The lay of the lies too exaggerated?  Gore paid for it, and is for years to keep paying.  The ‘green’ in Spain was known to largely stay mainly to one job created to two jobs, carbon, lost.  Al Gore pushed America with his laying of lies of "science" to exceed "green" in Spain’s largely staying mainly to one job, "green", created to two jobs, carbon based, lost to radical reign to nearer three American old jobs lost for just one Gorist laid and schemed "green" job fostered.

Even pedestrian city dwellers, or more so such can appreciate the new Lance Armstrong ad with "tailpipes" to clean green hybrid/all electric to draft.  Cyclists are equal in such an understanding and maybe not even near as much of those in urban jungles. 

Cleaner air is a good goal, yes.  Learning to celebrate life doing the same activities while using fewer resources and carbon too.  Appreciating preciousness in scare resources a wonder even in lay of lies of Gore "science" bunk. 

And, now we are at where we are at with "green" push in America having cost closer to three jobs it seems and not just American jobs for bunk science for each green job created.  Wowwie!  Unemployed people consume less carbon, and so create less bad and evil carbon gas.  A win for Gore?

So are we now less safe than we were before we cost the globe so many carbon and oil industries jobs?  Did we un-employ too many in Middle East economies with Gore radicalization of United States economics? Did President Bush not have the luxury President Obama has of a global economy now with enough global oil consumption especially by India and China to have kept Middle East from becoming anti-American as a result of increasing to "green" and higher MPG standards for Americans?  Is it that India and China can now save or create enough jobs in Middle East that America now has the luxury to pursue more efficient cars and trucks and machinery?

So yes we could have created a couple air cleaning industries and set new priorities for wind and solar and with solar tech now so far along that soon home roofing shingles that still look like roofing shingles will actually be solar energy collecting cells and quite affordable.

So yes we could have created new industries without reigning to Gorist bedding of alarmism for globe with end of world scenarios and romancing.  If not for Gore, as subject, might oil prices not have climbed over $4.00 per gallon on subjective economics of alarmism in a supply and demand valuation calculations and so to that if not for such would economy not have shrunken so just because of $4.00 gasoline?

Walk!

Walk!  It is now too late to reverse the Gorenomic cascade of from the lies he laid.  Federalism and state’s rights now maybe our only economics left to save us, and save us, yes, with a revaluation and evaluation to increases in local property taxes, as most equitable way to fix communities, of the problems professed by Obama Dems too but with their reaching to the most expensive and counter-productive big government solutions of "redistribution" of anothers to another without "justification" but "partisan".

DON’T WALK!

Someone, someone, we got to a global crisis of valuation and not for of the causes seemingly yet explained. 

Someone, someone, if it is a global crisis of valuation and such then reworking all local communities towards new "greener" and "liveable cities" seems to suggest "local property taxation" as a necessary first reassessment and with such of global reassessing. 

Quickies, national on income and profit taxation seems the worst possible temptation, and yet the favorite of these Dems, right?