6/25/2010

BLUE BAYOU - REVERBING SCOTUS

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 8:22 am

IT’S A WONDERFUL LIFE, as "past is prologue"?

President Obama’s past with OBAMA’S BERLIN SPEECH now critical reverbing concerns?

Is our new banking reform now profiteering like fortune telling towards a unlikely and improbable turn to right’s favor to community based capitalism, and now with local neighborhood and community banks empowered in fair "revaluations" to help level the confederate republic of our United States at state and local levels to better rulings on international playing fields, towards more level competitions?

Has it turned out to be so that these Democrats in attempting to excercise a thought loophole in our Preamble verbage, and subjectifying in certainly odd cappings, have now consecrated new laws, financial, that cannot long hold their socialist dreaming as inherent now to hallowing all back to community capitalism, and faster to a new federalism than any Republican electing in 2008 could have dreamnt or hoped, audacious, due to likely unavoidable opposition from these same Democrats?

Things not at all how you thought they were?

SCOTUS:  Did you consider the lesson I recently reread telling of while reading ARAFAT by Alan Hart, by Hart as official biographer with necessary access back in early 80s?  Did you consider the lesson ARAFAT and his brothers tought his captors of jailing them for activities so told about wouldn’t keep them from such activities and coordinatings of current or future such activities?  Do you know or did you of a history of birth of Ba’athist Party in Damascus maybe in late 40’s I hadn’t read of specifically of "Ba’athist" as a word meaning "resurrection" or "renaissance" and that party was started by progressives intent in creating a single Arab socialist state?   Have you considered how such birth helps explain American Democrats favoring and forgiveness of Saddam Hussein as our Republican couldn’t abide, and yet still with Saddam’s personal history of having climbed such party ranks as an "assassin"?

Things not at all how you thought they were?

POTUS:  So you did mean your orations from Berlin to have been legended and keyed around an allegorical of all "heirs to" of with usage of "my father" as "Father Russia"?

SOCIALISTS:  If government is supposed to have all the answers, socialist, and top down, then now how do you explain our blue bayous?   Their MMS?  There threats of years on since Hillary for President soap box rants to sieze all oil company profits and such as it may have driven oil companies to risk cost cutting to try to find a way to stay in business without profits?

FREEDOM LOVING AMERICANS, AND, OUR TROOPS:  Our preamble seems certain in its odd and specific emphasis with unexpected and unusual for its and our times still - capitalizations, and, as intended as a legend or key for the chorus and refrains of all that follows more specifically than such few poetic words, legal, though still poetically, and, legal, within our preamble of "We the People…general Welfare…secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves…" and with "general" certain in obviously not "General" as dreamnt up meant by Obama’s father and himself to so "socialist" fit and loophole needed with "People" not "people"?

Washed up now on our shores, all, these words of once young Senator Barack Hussein Obama, from Berlin, and with "my father" as like "Father Russia" (dream):

{note:  yes this speech shows more pride in communism than American capitalism and apologizes for America and speaking of America not getting along with other nations and peoples, and almost all its while pining for Soviet communism. His comments yesterday as President Obama speaking also pinningly of old Patriots, Soviet add confirmation to this note.}

  1. "I come to Berlin as so many of my countrymen have come before."
  2. "I know I don’t look like the Americans who’ve previously spoken in this great city."
  3. "The journey that led me here is improbable."  (me: not as past American leaders go)
  4. "And, you are here because you too know that yearning."
  5. "On that day, much of this continent still lay in ruin.  The rubble of this city had yet to be built into a wall. The Soviet shadow had swept across Eastern Europe,…and pondered how the world might be remade."
  6. "People of the world – look at Berlin!"
  7. "Look at Berlin, where Germans and Americans learned to work together and trust each other less than three years after facing each other on the field of battle."
  8. "Sixty years after the airlift, we are called upon again."
  9. "The fall of the Berlin Wall brought new hope. But that very closeness has given rise to new dangers - dangers that cannot be contained within the borders of a country or by the distance of an ocean."
  10. "In this new world, such dangerous currents have swept along faster than our efforts to contain them.  That is why we cannot afford to be divided. No one nation, no matter how large or powerful, can defeat such challenges alone."
  11. "Yes, there have been differences between America and Europe. No doubt…"  (me: what no mention of USSR here where fitting?)
  12. "That is why the greatest danger of all is to allow new walls to divide us from one another."
  13. "That is why America cannot turn inward.  That is why Europe cannot turn inward."  (me again:  What about Russia and Soviet "Patriots"?)
  14. "If we could win a battle of ideas against the communists, we can stand with the vast majority of Muslims who reject the extremism that leads to hate instead of hope."  (me:  Oh God!  Reagan wouldn’t have said "a battle" and so that this was as seeming a pining to winning one for the socialists with a defensive win in debating for ideas of communism - Reagan would most likey have said at least "The battle" and not let a sentence stand that by with just adding a coma after "ideas" would also read strongly as pining to win the battle of ideas for communism.   Again, Ba’athist Party as told founded by Alan Hart in his authorized biography of Arafat was of a conception as a "ressurection" or "renaissance" progressive party towards the goal and idea of a united singular Arab socialist state.)
  15. "This is the moment when we must build on the wealth that open markets have created, and share its benefits more equitably."  (Oh, God!  no capitalist and free marketer would be caught alive saying such, right?  "Build on the wealth that open markets created…" and not on the ideas of open markets that created it like of "teach a person to fish, instead of just giving them a fish?)
  16. SWEET SIXTEEN, THE REAL KICKER, IN ITS SINGULARITY AND SPLENDID ISOLATINGS:  "Will we stand for the human rights of the dissident in Burman, the blogger in Iran, or the voter in Zimbabwe?  Will we give meaning to (me: JUST?) the words "never again" in Darfur?"  (Oy! Oy! Oy! – so in his dreams from his father he gets to lead with there only "one dissident" and "one blogger" and "one voter" and play golf while only considering the meaning of words "never again"?)
  17. "We are people of improbable hope."
  18. "But I come before you to say that we are heirs (to his great "my father" and his dreams and such as allegorical as "Father Russia" - long live the Patriots, Soviet - Hi Afghanis, recognize me?) to a struggle for freedom."
  19. "…and remake the world once again."

SCOTUS:  A ruling please, a ruling please just treating USA equal, please!  Again, if President Obama were to shift his "speech" back to a "war on terror" wouldn’t your recent "terrorist support" speech ruling act as a gag on free speech as "critizing President Obama would seem desired by Executive Branch as "terrorist support" speech?  Please, oh, please rule and judge our preambe to be a full and legal Constitution in itself and so as written a bar to socializing Americans at any grouping larger than near community as such a bar in it odd and certain messaging in rare and quality capping with "People" in contrast marked so with "general" in "general Welfare" and with "secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves…" too.  Please treat the preamble as law and the legend and key for rest of binding Constitution with each oath of office taken with defending pledge. 

ECONOMISTS:  Yes our preamble seem a poetically keyed legend in law for full scope and purpose and economics of all that follows within.  Yes, economists, its odd and certain capping does bar socialism with nationalism and nationalization also with such consecrated around income taxation instead of wealth taxation and free press instead of state run media.   Yes our communities and parishes are still free to be small communists and argue regularly for a fair redistributing in their PSAs and sermonizings, even our state governors, have nearer basis in wealth taxation and a duty to act more "communist" where federal representation so barred, seemingly, and more regularly but with debate and justification in cause, cooperative, for more or greater and even sometimes less - redistribution.