4/11/2010

TOO MANY AMY

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 1:36 pm

Phil, good luck!  Best wishes to your Amy not an unrelated Amy of IBM once thought buried in my past, for her then not quite past.

Yes, it is hard to think of golf on TV without IBM, yet, still your Amy is not the old IBM Amy of before Gerstner days, and likely now still tied the old way through clubs, in golf clubs, and dinner clubs.

Poor Tiger Woods now being given enough southern rope to hang himself in golf.  Poor Tiger Woods now being let to run his rope out and return himself to counseling…?

These are not the same old days of south!  These are not even near the same old Chicago days of Jack Johnson as this is golf.  This is a new day of level playing fields and greens still uneven.

Is it his wins that made so many enemies or his losses?

Phil?  Your Amy is not another’s Amy, fight on.

Is it Tiger’s wins that drove him to such to now maybe only attract K-Y ads and Trojan ads?

What is the corporate think but now the old "southern rope" of though now "enough to hang yourself"?

Is this the future of golf now on trial?

It is sort of like wondering how many times do I have to bring defeat to Hillary Clinton as to now still try to help Phil Mickelson and his Amy.  See: my heroes were of James E. Burke and even much of his taking down Frank Metz of IBM and so I thought of taking down and away the "Amy" of such era thought "left behind" for good.  To use one on another Metz and playfully with "ego" for "zero tolerance" dominance should have been clear enough that putting such in play by a daughter (playfully) of one to the defeat of her father was only to be interpreted as nulifying any future relationship with such an "Amy" on any grounds anywhere close to being based upon trust.

To leave without a win, while to keep your standards and ambitions in place before any real guilt could/should be established and in a different era but still an era of consequence in current politics national…?

Well, Ogilvy, I grew up wanting to be of a familiar legend like another Ogilvy and did fit quite so into such’s familiar’s shoes of old Church’s wingtips even when Phil, fell back in Mamaroneck, and so even years earlier at Tuxedo Club visit of considering another Amy not Phil’s.

It really is hard to believe President Obama is a SOCIALIST as to be such should require so much work in transforming our governance that he shouldn’t have any available time for golf or for basketball. Well, maybe I should get to just golf.

Is it a "level playing field" to play as Tiger Woods with so many known "belles" as like playing on steroids but without?  Is this the secret of "Bill’s" success or the secret of "Hillary’s" success? 

Surely women, it can only be one way and not both ways, right?

Well, for Tiger’s sake I do reflect that he grew up since first "golf spot" and such "national exposure" having more "girl friends" over fifty and maybe even over sixty five than any golfer ever.

Tiger, can you help the sport by helping Amys?  Can you help the sport by not spoiling marriages of choice and not of near forced compliance? 

Surely it is best for "Hillary" to remain silent and maybe take a fifth…?

SAVED BY THE BELLE?

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 7:49 am

WE ARE ALL APPROACHING AN ANNIVERSARY, TOGETHER, AS AMERICANS. LAST YEAR ON THIS NEARING DAY OF SUCH TELLING ANEW WE SMARTED TO REVENUES BEING DOWN NEAR 40% ACROSS OUR COUNTRY. THE WORLD MAY BE WATCHING MORE THAN WE THINK, STILL.

WHAT IS IN A NAME? 

WHAT IS IN THE TYPE?

WHAT IS IN THE SET - HOW DEEP IS IT SET?

(I AM OLD ENOUGH TO HAVE ACTUALLY OWNED AND USED A "SMITH CORONA" TYPEWRITER AND KNOW THE "SAVED BY THE BELL" THIS PIECE IS NOT ABOUT. I AM THOUGH HARDLY OLD ENOUGH WHILE FOUR YEARS TO DAY YOUNGER THAN PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA.)

SO, IF YOU HAD IT TO DO ALL OVER AGAIN…?

WOULD YOUR FAVOR BE FOR A "TYPIST" OF ANOTHER GENDER? WOULD YOUR "SET" BE JUST A "CARBON COPY" - YET A "BELLE"?  IS THEIR "STOKE" AND "JUSTIFICATION" BUT THE SAME?

ARE YOU NOW ASKING: BUT "PRESIDENT HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON" WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER?

WELL TAX DAY IS COMING, TAX DAY IS COMING, TAX DAY IS COMING AGAIN AND AGAIN LIKELY WITH "REVENUES" DOWN. THEIR SET IS THE SAME - ONLY THEIR NAMES ARE DIFFERENT?

DID FIRST LADY HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON EVER, AS FIRST LADY OF ARKANSAS, EVER REALLY LOOSE HER "CHICAGO STREET" AND BECOME A "SOUTHERN BELLE"? DID FIRST LADY HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON DO ANYTHING BUT PROMISE AS RADICAL CHICAGO STYLE SOCIALIST ONSET OF NEW GOVERNANCE?  DID SENATOR HILLARY CLINTON SMART WHEN ONLY TWO OF HER SENATE PEERS VOTED TO KEEP HER IN THE SENATE?

ARE WE SAFER NOW THAT IT IS SECRETARY HILLARY CLINTON?  ARE WE SAFER WITH SUCH OF RECENT PAST OF ‘WE WILL SIEZE OIL COMPANY PROFITS’ AND WITH MAYBE RELATED ‘WE WILL "OBLITERATE" IRAN’?

ARE WE IN AN "FOUR MORE YEARS OF CLINTON" ANYWAYS?

AREN’T WE JUST IN A "FOUR MORE YEARS OF CLINTON" AS EVIDENCED BY THOSE SURROUNDING "PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA"?

WELL WE ARE APPROACHING APRIL 15TH "TAX DAY" AND LIKELY WITH REVENUES WHERE THEY WOULD BE IF SENATOR HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON HAD BEEN ELECTED IN DEMOCRAT PRIMARY AND OUR GENERAL ELECTION OF 2008. 

DID SHE EVER REALLY BECOME A "SOUTHERN BELLE"?

DID SHE EVER LOOSE HER ILLINOIS "STREET" OF TALES TOLD OF HAVING BEEN RAISED TO HIT THE NEIGHBORHOOD BOYS FIRST?  

THIS IS NOT NOW THE DAYS WE CAN SAY WE WOULD HAVE BEEN SAVED BY THE "BELLE" - THIS IS NOW THE ONSET OF "HILLARY DEMS" ESPECIALLY AROUND THE "OBAMA" ECONOMICS.

TODAY THOUGH IS THE LAST DAY OF PLAY (?) AT AUGUSTA MASTERS:  SECRETARY HILLARY CLINTON:  HAVE YOU EXPRESSED YOUR THOUGHTS AND FEELINGS AROUND TIGER WOODS PLAY YET? 

WOULD WOOD WIN WIND WOODS WITHIN WALLS WITH "WOMEN" WON WITH WOOD’S WOODS WHILE WONDERING WITH WIN WON WITH "WOMEN" WON WHILE WITH "WOMAN" "WIFE" WONDERING WON "WITH" "WOMEN" WONDEROUS WHITHER WILEY WITH WHETHER WITH WITH WON "WITHIN WALLS WOOD" WON?

SECRETARY HILLARY?