4/30/2010

PERSONALITY TEST

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 7:42 pm

And so the townie goes… 

And so the greaser …

The gowns all "cloaked" or just "cloaked"?

Did President Obama ever ride the rawhide of Brooks, of Brooks English Saddles?

What a race, afoot, already, with more staging to witness or partake.  And it all started with President Obama wanting to run a personality based presidency. 

So gather near all, come and listen, and, oh by the way should President Obama have grown up to be a preacher?  Did you see him without a teleprompter (glitch) seeming at home again, but from a pulpit, of a cathedral, National, on a sad and glorious day?

Rest in peace Dorothy Height.  Will President Obama apply to seminary after his presidency, he seems so at home orating in his chosen faith’s environs?

Was he even, even and not spinning? Is he ready for the Correspondents Dinner and Leno?  Yet?  Am I helping?

In recaping at this stage:  Of President Obama and his personality based governance: Of President B.O. who must have been riddled as a youth for "B.O.": Will he do a reverse Steele and enter Seminary after politics?  He seemed so at home; R.I.P. Dorothy Heights.

The "ghosts in the machine" of personalities others seem to be rent out leaving him all the room to be himself, now. What will Jay Leno lambast? Who will Jay Leno roast? 

Is it to be James Carville the "townie" a "greaser" breaking away?  Is such impossible as a ghost of "its the economy, stupid" now stuck in our "machine" economic?  Mechanical difficulties enough to thwart Alberto Contador now a "headwind" on peloton of metophor of Clintons touring as the problem and maybe a solution? How can "personality" now free save from falls of Clintons?  Have they taken down the entire pack of Dems?

Will this Sunday mark President Obama’s fiftieth golf outing?  How does press pack back up so in golf carts a following, and on so many Sundays?  Who is the real President Obama? Has he already had twice as many in near one year than Bush had in three years to near all eight years?  Got game?  Family time?

So the Clintons’ falls are more now "problems" economic and now with "inheritance" blame spread back into eight behind eight and now undermining confidence in "solutions" even not "permanent" as Obama Presidency packed with Clintons’ colors bearers? 

Mr. Leno do you have his "personality" nailed/punctured?  Is he ready for you?  Are the Clintons or Carville ready? Can his "personality" now free do anything but affirm more "jobless recovery" - philosophically speaking?

Was he better to have been born of the era of "flappers and philosophers" of prohibition?  Is he out to pull a "reverse Steele"?

Movin’ on up? Still? The Clintons’ falls too much for his personality now free? 

Root for the "townie" and uncloak the cloaked not Main Streeting well?

Well maybe the National Cathedral did have teleprompters - Rest in peace Dorothy Height!

Oh, President Obama you seem to own the "jobless recovery" "economics"!  Are you betting against the Democrats this November and already suggesting they start packing up their bags/things?

Mr. Leno? 

4/29/2010

GET A LIFE? - FLAPPERS?

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 7:12 am

What goes around, comes around, and is read all over? 

Are you of the "posse of the fourth estate"?

How are your numbers?  Have your attempts towards "get out and move" been riddled with flaps still?

Are you a pack rat?  Is that a Joker in your spokes, dressed like a flapper?  A queen of hearts?  An ace?

Got out an moved? Getting out and moving? Losing fat but gaining weight? Not complaining? Remembering Wright cycle American snobbery?

Remember to consult your physician before trying something new! 

Before there was Lance Armstrong carrying American cycling pride and near before/of Greg Lemond I was a young "addiction prone teen" with an addiction to tools and bike tools especially.  It was an addiction I had to work through and often those years by putting miles under me, on a machine maintained by me.  I think I have broken such addiction finally but not after getting to owning so many tools and using them professionally as a licenced general contractor that I started thinking I had too many and started selling. I still own more than I had when Lemond won his tours but sold maybe as many.

Before there was Lance I was a neighborhood bike mechanic earning and spending on bikes and bike tools and for most particular of clients of professional lancing as a pediatric neurosurgeon, who rode a Motobecane with Campy Record group, maintained and tuned by me.  The truing stand I would borrow time on even for such bike/client was a old classmate of Bush 43 and a cycling enthusiast as well.

It is a pleasure to report I am now in 2010 back to cycling as my primary sport/hobby now after a couple decades more a cycling supporter engrosed in other sports and activities.  I am happy to report the near flap of fat is thining down and am marveling that such is while watching my weight increase.

Are you getting out a moving?  I recommend it even if it leads to weight gain.  I have held/bragged that I had stayed "fit" these years and even back near four years ago when I shifted from construction in DC area at 218 Lbs and 33% body fat to blogging and writing full time.  Hillary had announced a run for our Presidency I had no choice but to shift to full time efforts to prevent such.  I did though consider I should go on a diet and lose weight for new lifestyle, sedentary, and did lose near forty pounds and with weight loss with fat loss of reduction to near 18%.

Is it new to you to consider exercising as a weight gain activity even when you don’t mean it to be and while meaning to lose fat?  Do you know what it is like to step on a scale expecting to be able to brag about weight loss from exercise to find only that your old cycling muscles are redefining themselves, as large again? I may have to learn to be content at reducing flap and surrender on weight loss.

Take yesterday, after blogging I set off for a ride into my old home town now about ten miles away expecting to ride for about three hours, and, well got home hours later thinking I had ridden about 44 miles.  Well I "Mapped My Ride" and to find that by riding roads in lew of trails and out to near Quinnipiac Polling Institute on QU western flank near the huge Sleeping Giant with a Hogan Rd on QU eastern flank, and, well, it seems I rode about 53 miles while out for more than three hours a bit.

I was just messing around and out in weather in the forties with winds from NW at 10-15 mph, with some scattered drizzle. Half the roads I may have only ridden on once before but driven over years growing up.  New Haven and Hamden have done a wonderful job with their "Rails to Trails" efforts, but that was a similar round trip without hills and much traffic a couple weeks ago.  Yes these numbers are political and practical.

Are you of the "posse of the fourth estate"?

Are you setting an "example" and getting out and trying to move if only to have a luff in your jib and a back wind in your main?  If I were still in DC I would likely still be useful and maybe favored as "200 Lbs of rail meat" for three days of sailboat racing this weekend in Annapolis waters.  But what a different story in the numbers now.

I am not bragging here.  I am, I am that is sharing a great puzzlement of aging not expected, or the "not aging" of old.  See I today could still be 210 Lbs of sailing "rail meat" working the fore deck today but with return to cycling sport/hobby I instead of having lost near 40 and near half fat percentage I am now only down about eight Lbs from before shifting to full time defeating of Hillary for President writing but now at near my low fat percentage.

How I yesterday can hit the old hills near the Sleeping Giant and on Ridge Road and not at the old "six miles into ride" but at "thirty under me" and have the old hills feel the same as when I was still a teenager but now know of my heartrate getting over standard "maximum heart rate" for one of my age that would then have been of near 200 but not measured, well, well?  How I have gotten to 161 Lbs of muscle mass on my five foot eight + frame is just a wonder.

I do recommend getting out and moving even if you too fail to lose weight.  Last time I rode this regularly I would occassionally team up with another rider Rice, back on roads in Senator Jack Reed’s district of the Town of New Shoreham back in mid 80’s to late 80’s.  My squash racket was idle but as "The Diplomat" by Slazenger but my Panasonic with Shimano components with an America saddle and French rims stayed "active" and "considerable."

If I do put cards/jokers in my wheels again it will likely be my American Cannondale mountain bike of ‘88 vintage with tappered forks not "shock absorber" forks.

Yes, please get out and move and consider dressing like a flapper while losing your flap(s).  

Please keep it stylish and true. Have you seen the great new single speeds? 

4/26/2010

THE SENIORITY?

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 9:47 pm

Once upon a time in a land called "Colonies"…?  

A Governor Clinton was causing quite a stir, quite a stir called THE FEDERALIST PAPERS.

Is Clinton really just against all this just for fear of loosing power and seniority authority?

Oh, this gets so confusing all the Clintons to remember and be wary of, still!   Who is it that failed to learn from history, our history, us or them?

It was a simpler time those days of first real troublesome to the United States of America Clinton, the then Governor of New York State even with him attempting to protect his power and seniority authority by opposing joining the rest of the colonies.

To think "term limits" became an Amendment only after the Roosevelt administration and its progressive reaching - wow!

Today’s discussion is on Paper #10 as being blogged and "shared" on facebook forums with THE FEDERALIST PAPERS on going more scholarly than seditious give and take.

Quite something that in the day, those days #10 was needed even to win over Clinton and with today our Arizona so perturbed.  So yes I write again, for free, are you surprised?

See this ongoing debate about powers of Washington the current capitol not the original non-king of America has got me perturbed:    Today a faction is the factions of concern that our Confederate Republic as conceived is not too involved in local factions.  So?  So #10 Paper these are not the days of arguing for a central government of benefits of preventing more local factions through debate and discussions afar in a capital for a confederate republic of America.   Where when you were so wise and pursuasive now you show more relevance in discussions on Iraq than on capital power.

So Clintons have history of not stopping in efforts to hold onto maximum power and even fighting as British Generals towards preventions of occurances of freedom.  So?   What have we failed to learn from our histories with Clintons?   How did better known Clintons not fix this mess now a "faction" in Arizona?   They are an admitted "two-fer" and yet I don’t think that THE FEDERALIST PAPERS discussed such as other than ‘one’.   How are these Clintons at all an "example" for young democracies or struggling peoples and tribes of Afghanistan?  How are these troublesome Clintons not a deterent to democratic progress and freedoms in Iraq?

Now we even have a troubled Clinton in our history as Americans as a Secretary of State and yet Arizona seems hung out to dry with relations of State.  Now we have such as another troublesome Clinton more concerned with seniority authority and personal power than our democratic state as conceived as a confederate republic?  Oh, and the opium of Afghanistan too a matter of State?   Oh, and the oil of Iraq Clintons let general Americans think Bush/Cheney’s only concern and for of "personal profits"?

Well, #10? 

Well?   What do we make of such?   These are not the times of our colonies and colonists realizes they were neighbors and likely to be neighbors a while and so should see wisdom in having a place pre-established and organized for discussions of "neighborliness" when working and needing work?   Those were those times yet now a "faction" of from a republic too concerned with itself as a collective of individuals seeking more power for themselves of such that THE FEDERALIST PAPERS would have warned and alerted around?

What do we make of such and still around troublesome "Clintons"?   Would writers of such Papers have been perturbed and alarming today of a faction of greater rights to local fractions as factions perturbed by a too reaching see of Washington?

So  it can be said that Clinton was most concerned about loosing seniority authority and power!  But poor Arizona now, as another of State must have been dropping the ball.

If our colonies were neighbors but didn’t have a place and a venue organized around "discussions" of factions then every day would have been of a reinventing of a wheel, yes?

Today, though, our Washington cannot be called to mend these "factions" across our states as these factions are of those perturbed that Washington is too involved in its "factions"!

An American faction now not convenient to the arguments of #10 as now Washington now the place not for "factions" so to be resolved.   And, yet still we have a Clinton(s) on the wrong side of progress and democracy. 

4/24/2010

PRESENT! - PHASOLOGY PRESENT!

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 6:41 am

This must just be a phase.

Present!   Present?  

It is always 3 am some where - or within a half hour,  have we forgotten the matters of State and of Hillary’s pride around Christmas Day bomber/The Underwear Bomber?

Have we forgotten 1993 and the childish play of (early?) Clinton Middle East Diplomacy of:  Clintons asking Middle East Leaders as a group and around mostly IRAQ… to "just blame the American Republicans" and so of getting a promise from these leaders not to burden the Clintons by blaming them?   Diplomacy or "childs play"?  Childs play as intent now seems certain to have been Clinton trickery to get these leaders on their honor to not act or blame America during all the years Clintons were in office, with out regard for much geopolitics or decades of simmering and at times boiling histories.   Childs play Clintons were both "present" and a "two-fer" in "Diplomacy" of "State" that made us less safe, and …

{Facebook has a new popular group and active discussion on going now on The Federalist Papers @ facebook group page for THE FEDERALIST PAPERS.  I will briefly take a break from this column to rejoin discussion and with considerations for additions and/or subtractions to this summation with much relevance to "federalism" today.}

{This is a discussion both of "Present!" and of "present" (not?) around global federalism here today as well, so please look for some reasoning and historical significance, still, still here too.}

{Global Federalism:  The Clintons as an example of what not to do?  We should not discuss "terrorism" or Iraq or national security without understanding the Clintons’ "two-fer" on "federalism, today, and global"!   Seems they mode of operating was to burn the (votive?) candles always from both ends and at the same time while selling:  What beautiful light!}

[note:  In recent previous columns I have harkened upon "Bill and Hillary" within my rights as "thieves" and yet did not so explain the "rediculous" in my protections as for their unauthorized assumptions fitting for the annals of our history we may be safe now finally more from Clintons though once less for of such taking "incompletely" and without considerations of author/architect sought they did by taking without permission of such and such as only about 70% of a whole architecture/political strategic dribble a decade on then in ponderance so put us at risk by taking only 70% and not asking if there was more than they were stealing to consider.   Clintons’ "two-fer" legacy now at risk for they didn’t know to protect themselves by taking all of what was considered and considered necessary for ponderance before acting on some of architecture of such complexity?]

Well I am back.  I was experiencing headiness from such a discussion of The Federalist Papers in such a large group, so not just a phase.  The original intent of this blog may have to wait for another for concluding.

Seems our President though once a Constitutional Law Professor (still?) smarts on scholarly objections and lively discussions of Federalism and state’s rights of our (still?) limiting with our Constitution.   Now Washington Dems have handed Republicans and all "not Democrats" an advantage for November as Arizona immigration story is evidence of "Federalism" arguments not having been scholarly addressed and debated in Washington by the passing of candy for all of Healthcare Reform before passing real immigration reform.   Dems have set themselves up by not having a full "Federalism" debate and cohesive debate as now they do not and can not look serious on budgeting and "centralization" for having put heathcare before immigration.   Arizona had to act to assert state’s rights more just because Washington had acted impulsively and without full consideration at a national level on an issue that is definitely related.   Now only more expensive solutions seem possible at state and national level for Washington Dems having acted and so in clear disregard as well for the expressed will of the majority of America on a bill known for near a year.

4/22/2010

IN CONTINUANCE

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 6:06 pm

It isn’t going away.

It is not to go away.

It certainly is not going away any time soon.

To resume:  To assume!  Hillary you know what is said of/for "do not assume"?  To assume?   Assumed!  Assumed too much!  Assumed too long!  Assumed still too long?

How many times did Hillary get defeated already around such?  Too many to count?

To presume:  To be brief:  Now: Republicans and Bush/Cheney and folk do have a lot to be here "interested in." 

To presume:   Her assumptions still haunt her.  Her assumptions still haunt "Bill and Hillary."  Her assumptions still haunt the Democrats.   Her assumptions still with those associated are still much in play.

To be brief:  No rush, no rush unless you are a Republican looking to redeem the party’s image to the max by November.   In her inappropriate assumptions, now way past reasonable as "confusable political" played, her and "Bill’s" usage still unchallenge confuse our American political history, nationally at least.   In brief:  The "change" of story so confused by inappropriate usage by Clintons from back in early 90’s is a "life line" to Republicans as such efforts to effect postive change and as much as possible with the era of great adaptations to a new world order of post Cold War winning by Bush as such efforts assumed inappropriately and for so long, and with cravings of more thwarted, is soundly a start of such positive change and anchoring of such towards effective affecting in urban America and such that Republicans now may crave a more speedier outing as for the "THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM" and its prose and poetry pre-date the Clintons entry into 1992 race and so, and so soundly that such change Clintons still get their most political lift and popularity from stands still as change that was already set to happen under a second term for President Bush.   Republicans may want a brief continuance as a full telling of such story will expose Clintons freshly for inappropriate assumptions, and still.  Is America hungry to learn how Bush 43 had to spend most of his years fixing the messes the Clintons left him with the "changes" they didn’t wrought and even more the ones the did?   Yes, President Bush 41 likely would have been blessed with so much of the positive change Clintons still ride popularity of as if it were theirs, and all the while Reagan/Bush and Bush/Quayle "primed the systems" and helped lay the foundation.

It is certainly not going away any time soon.   Makes a few books with material existing already and artful still.  

Hillary:  Are your associates annoyed you assumed so much? 

To be brief:  Why do brief?  

4/21/2010

UNAUTHORIZED — AGAIN.

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 8:12 pm

So to be brief:  I still am in my rights to think Bill and Hillary thieves.  I am still in my rights to consider their political usage for their selfish political gains of rhyme and reasoning of original works of mine from mostly before they entered their "two-fer" in the 1992 race.   They never acquired nor were granted free usage and repeated free usage of the personal artworks that made my own efforts successful.

But to be brief:   It is still the outrage of the introduction of Barack Obama to the world with his 2004 Convention Speech that haunts us all now from the audacity I felt and witnessed turning on the TV that night to (from me) "are they (Democrats) nuts?"  WTF!  The Democrats are trying to put a black face and personality into ownership (political) (anew) of my "political art/artistry" and again without authorization or any rights of ownership.   I had to turn it off it was so gastly.

Note:  My efforts were of a creation of a body of "political art" developed as a Reagan voter and much more a Republican than a Democrat of the early 90s.   My efforts we by then a decade in the making, and we much care and work, and study.   I had been trying to be ready as a "artist" to be a caboose to the Reagan Revolution.   My work though temporarily and in "charity" to struggling and near "lost" Democrats was never as an endorsement but a "band-aid" like a "kick in the pants" with respect for my rights to my own political art and story.  Most of this can be found condensed in my THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM and even the parts where I remind and refresh my sense of ownership and billability of days before they started moving towards playing fast and loose with "ownership" and towards making an as noted "Republican’s" efforts their in the public eye – without authorization.

So to be brief:   I guess I couldn’t for past year have been so keen to their strategies to be so effective in thwarting if what I mention above were not true.   I do really wonder if Barack Obama knew in 2004 that he was of attempts to put a "black face" of ownership around my personal struggles and decades of effort towards such "political art" kept mostly in "political poetry" and some prose whose rhythms and reasoning, and rhyming and beats are still heard echoed especially when Democrats are getting desperate to try to reclaim "successes" from 90’s that now more seem to understand they still don’t understand, and for needing to again play fast and loose, without authorization.   It was near twelve years ago I signed in to Library of Congress and tried some phrase and key word searches to see if maybe I had missed "a great mind" using the "art" of my "art" that such Dems could be said to have been using instead of admitting to unauthorized use of mine, to no avail – nothing popped out that suggested they had a different source.

So, really, I couldn’t have been so successful in thwarting their efforts this past year if this indeed were not true, right?   Was Obama duped into using "offered" lines without knowing and intent such?   He didn’t even have DREAMS OF MY FATHER published by time most of such "art" was consecrated and dated with by J.P.Hogan.   Anyone?   It works as a caboose to Reagan Revolution but hardly as an adapted tool for bringing in soclialism, luckily.   Shameful what they tried to do with its popularity.

4/20/2010

A PARLIAMENTARY PERSPECTIVE - TANGENTIALS

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 8:10 am

What might the Democrats fear the most but their greatest fear?

How might the Democrats fear most themselves and their up from the sixties…?

Is it too late for "fifty five saves lives" safety of old standards?  Are they off the rails?

Surely they are near their greatest fears with an election cycle ever to be about comparing and contrasting Democrats as either "innocent with potential — Obama" to either and both Carter and Clinton and Clintons as what of "two-fer" reseductions, right?

Well,  we are at a time and a season where we can turn off our internet connections and turn off our major media and just feel the pace and "community" of our neighbors.  Will we, enough?

If we get to/get past Iran as a "nuclear threat" realities of more reasonable to we the people of these united States of "We the People…"  now of these so united United States of America  and of an era now where we are not as maybe "at greatest risk" from Iran as Russia and China and India reasonably are then we can turn off our TVs and computer internet connections and feel these our times, these the paces of our communities.

Are Democrats using "EVIL IRAN" to keep you glued to a system of governance of dependence they want more than you?   If they are of "go green" and "environmentalists" than they too should be of seeing Iran’s leadership should see more moral cause and from historical relevance of towards aim and targeting of Russia and old Soviet States and India and China if only for the polutants and such drift?

Under recent past eight years the errors and omissions of the avoidance and inaction of Clintons’ previous eight years "We the People" have shown Iran we can be a better friend and more useful friend than enemy.   We have demonstrated a willingness and resolve in recent past to stand with Muslims in their seeking of justice from other Muslims.  We have shown Muslims we are better friends than Russia and old Soviet ties, and still arguably as still now of even back then in Cold War days attempts.

To be brief:   November tangents:   Reasoning American democracy:  Reasoning American colonialism:   Obama in November of the worst of Clintons and Carter and without reasoning out difference between trying to take America Socialist in perspective of size and comparable advantages in sizing.  — They say we should be more like France is in socialism and healthcare coverage yet proceed to making us more like old mother Russia of U.S.S.R. by attempting such for a country now three times as populated as current Russia.  — These Democrats fear democracy? — These Democrats if for mirroring European socialism should proceed to parliamentary representation of similar size of attempting such only as with "states" of similar size — our fifty?   To proceed as I fear these Dems are forgetting to fear we are not just trying to "reset" U.S.S.R. style socialism but by jumping the line, American, are so by Obama orations still of trying to take Europe away from their "socialism" of sovereign states and into a Euro "vanilla" socialism more of "reseting" old Soviet model of parliamentary proceedures.  — Have we now no choice but to "just say no" and return to our roots of our own wisdom and sense of "neighbor"? 

4/17/2010

BILL CAN’T POSSIBLY BE HELPING?

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 7:25 am

Civics 101?  Who is the President? 

Who is the real head of the Democrat Party, now?

Something about the United States of America is a military superpower "like it or not"…

Does anyone know after such so recently what a "democrat" actually is anymore?

Are there now "Clinton Democrats" as the rebels against "Obama Democrats"?  Are their two sects of cells of Clinton Democrats?

Are we now with "Peace Dividends" slash and burn our "military superpower" "Clinton Democrats" (FOBs)?

Are we more now of "Necessary Warring" "spend than tax" "Obama Democrats"?

Is Secretary Clinton torn between two leaders?

Is Secretary Clinton serving two masters?

Are there yet "Secretary Clinton Democrats" completing a "troika" of sorts?

We really are all being asked still and regularly to decided if you are a "Clinton Democrat" or an "Obama Democrat" "whether you like it or not"?

We really are all being asked more though to look the other way;  We really are all being asked to "just trust Democrats" even though they are still and regularly putting out conflicting "reputations" and "positions" as right, and one of "Clinton Democrats" of no "war" is necessary even as Taliban took to over-running Afghanistan.

But, to be brief:  Is Secretary of State Clinton sending State monies the wrong way?  Our America, under "Obama Democrats" of the United States of America, is a military superpower "like it or not"! As such Clinton seems to beg the question that today so left as such a "global police force" shouldn’t we be "collecting" not "distributing" funds, "like it or not"?

4/14/2010

TAX FACTIONS? - TAX FRACTIONS?

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 8:51 pm

So what is a teacher?

Are "teachers" a "faction"?

Do they instruct on sects and human relations as a whole, undivided?  Are they usually just dealing with fractions? 

And how is your tax math?  Are all the factions covered by your fractions?  So the Clintons failed to be "teachers" in their eight year reign as the indivisible First Couple, unless you understand when the definition of "is" be "isn’t"?

How did they as much more of the era of NUREMBERG TRIALS, the movie, miss the opportunity to be instructive with war crimes and crimes against humanity by Saddam Hussein?  How did Clintons avoid instrumental according to thwart the spread of Taliban in Afghanistan for the whole of their reign?

Have the Clintons become now a fractured faction now instructive in opposites?  Should "Whitewater" have been more conclusive and pursuasive as the "introduction" it was?  To Thomas Friedman: Shame on you trying to tag Bush today with "neo-realist" when Clintons’ still own such duplicity near exclusively.

Are too many factions covered?  Too little a fraction of those covering? 

To Thomas Friedman: Shame on you avoiding and failing to act to mention Clintons eight years in column today and as due honest discussion of their eight years of avoidance and inaction as "neo-realists" if you must! 

Everyone else:  To understand a perspective on Bush’s strategizing on Middle East region in a post Clinton "inheritance" you have to do what President avoided and bring up Clinton "psycho-babble" factions.  Iraq people were feeling more "abandoned" by the great United States of America and so were many in Afghanistan. Clintons together as "one" indivisible as "two-fer" did let the "abandonment" grow and fester, unchecked. To help effectively in Afghanistan it made sense that the greater sense of "abandonment" of post "Persian Gulf War" had to be address, and first, and within what lessons might be found in "Clinton psycho-babble."

I mentioned Clintons’ inaction and avoidance on Nuremberg lessons and now also their avoidance of spreading of Taliban post America’s "abandonment."  Did you know Hitler built the Autobahn?  Which factions paid for such and at what fraction?  Would we have luxury BMWs or Mercedes and/or Toyotas without first having the Autobahn?  Would such have been thought vain compared to America "muscle cars" and ox carts?

How were you with math?  Does the new IRS already know?  Isn’t Obama’s administration prying into your records for centralized efficiencies far more than Bush/Cheney?

So Clintons failed to teach and show "selfishness" and "power grabbing" their M.O.?  How else to calculate a summation of the "inheritance" left still a pile of work for the president after President Bush?  A whole mess of nothing? 

History too?  What factions you ask?  Who are the Clintons’ but not more of William Blygh, captain of the Bounty, like William Blythe III? Who are they but Governor Clinton whom founders had to write the still prominent lessons in our THE FEDERALIST PAPERS just to combat factions of Governor Clinton, of New York?  Are they more the General Clinton they failed to spread lesson plans to defuse and differentiate themselves from as he was the British General trying to keep colonies from a Federalist loose uniting?  Why did such a Rodham chose to marry one born William Blythe III  but by then named William Jefferson Clinton?  So they avoided action to "separate" themselves from such poor leaders?  Why?

Are your factions covered with your fraction?

And then came Obama!

Can we find lessons on tax day still on Obama fractions and his chosen faction?  What do we make of learning if/when that friends "Michelle and Barry" to Mr. and Mrs. Tony Rezko in their times of hardship and imprisonment have left it yet another year be that Rezkos pay the property taxes on two thirds of the Obama’s side yard? Is it four fifths?  Is it 2/3s of "Obama’s side yard" but eighty percent of property taxes? 

What did we fail to learn from Hitler having built the Autobahn? 

What did we fail to learn from Clintons and their "Whitewater"?

Mr.and Mrs. President: Have you still not bought out the instantly depreciated property held by the Rezkos as your side yard? Are you still of having bought a fifth or a sixth of the property they paid full market price for and now still of holding enough of such property that it suddenly became a subprime lot worth half as much as they paid, or so, yet while only getting reimbursed a fraction of their instantly lost "VALUE" by selling their faction a fraction that was the controlling fraction?  Have you let your faction in Rezko keep paying the property taxes on two thirds of your side yard and in such days of "hardship" upon them?

Yes, math faction and historical fractions:  It is much cheaper for Obama’s to let Rezkos keep owning the lot that suddenly became a subprime lot by worth near half as much or less for just selling about a sixth.

What did we fail to learn from Hitler having built the Autobahn and then years later Clintons not pursuing prosecution of Saddam Hussein, like Nuremberg trials?  Are all the lessons of the Clintons now to be of the "opposites"? 

4/13/2010

A NEW LOW?

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 7:01 pm

Space ally? How much for your Secretary of State?

On this anniversary of Apollo 13 of 1970 redramatization with Hanks and Sinise:  Let me not be alone in reiterating that America has know at least since 1970 how to filter out dangerous green house carbon gases from our environment.  (See movie)

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton was a choice pick for her proud and known "skills" and yet not yet considered as of such same "skills" should disqualify her from "Honorable" benching. 

See: she and "Bill" had their reputations and even ran on vindicating "Bill" and his disbarments with a new national stage venture? 

See: "Hillary" was a natural for a wise political removal of her from national stage and spotlight of our Senate and for her proud and known skills to do the "lying" like in THE HUNT FOR RED OCTOBER:  "What?  You have lost another nuclear submarine."

So what about the economy now so near April 15th so close to Apollo 13 oxygen tank explosion in 1970?

Was the recession "unnecessary" but for "Healthcare Hillary" of "Clinton Machine" entering the 2008 race for our Constitution defending "office of the president"? 

Did the economy freeze on fears of "President Hillary"?  Was it just her associations with "global warming alarmism" and the global scaring of worlds children with end of world doomism and "murdered" tossing to anyone buying another gallon of gasoline "knowing" they were killing polar bears with such?

Really quit absurd.  You asked: "How much for your Secretary of State" space ally.   Not much, how about a dollar?

To look again at our latest "low" as "unnecessary" and a fabrication of Democrats White House seeking with a new extra-Constitutional AMBASSADOR TO THE WORLD post just for "Bill":  Al Gore and his global warming alarmism and global snobbery ignored what we knew back since at least April 1970 of Apollo 13 mission, that we knew as a nation how to capture and filter out dangerous greenhouse gases from our environments.

See:  We didn’t need to do the "kill off" of old American ways to spearhead a new Gorist Creed, and all the automotive and corporate air flight jobs and companies.  We didn’t have to go the path of Spain that showed us to seek such a radical new creed so was likely to cost at least two jobs for each new "green" job created.  

Didn’t you know American or Canadians had already done work on inexpensive filter and capture devises that could be put on roof tops in "exhaust" regions and create a new industry and jobs without having destroyed old American ways? 

Really, space ally, just a dollar will do.

What is "honorable"?  How is "Honorable" even a consideration for a known and admitted past just "fork tongued" double speaking orator named Mrs. William Jefferson Clinton ("Hillary")?  Do you remember that Gore’s concerts went to the trash yards and collected old tires to bring to his concerts to "not waste energy" and for concerts that could have been more "daytime" and not "needing" large venue night lighting?

It still makes little sense that Bush administration caused this "new low". 

The Republicans had a lack of motivation to create again an economics for advantaging by Democrats, again, of "it is the economy, stupid." 

It was Democrats that were yelling about Bush spending too much and being prohibitive on spending that countered the rash bleeding of a trillion too much in Clintons leeching federal budget by two trillion, too quickly. 

Bush could only have tried to fix economy the way he did with Obama’s transition team by specifically showing that the Clintons had irresponsibly taken near a trillion too much out of spending for their and some other’s "instant popularity." 

Democrats couldn’t win 2008 if they let Bush do the spending now known better to have been needed to fix Clintons’ reign.

So:  The recession was an "UNNECESSARY ECONOMIC LOW" or was it inevitable for their was no way to stop Clintons from trying to bend Constitutional intent and wisdom by pushing hard for a return to our "BULLY PULPIT" of our White House?

So oil spiked after Senator Clinton threatened to sieze oil company profits and not necessarily just American company profits? 

Or, was it a spike that happened only after Al Gore alarmism introduced unprecedented "subjectivism" into our economics by scaring consumers that they were immoral and killing polar bears with every gallon of gas consumed?

Maybe both?  Maybe both and all the while we had the technology and were rebuilding our automotive and energy science and practice with day nearing of everyday home roofing shingles able to look near the same and yet be a integrated circuitry of solar energy capture and usage? 

Our/your next generations were already "all over it" yet likely with Bush/Cheney to get credit for being "on top of it" and "green" but not yet or still "anti-capitalist"?

So the housing bubble became dangerous because it was a Clinton "unfunded federal social program" as concieved and inaugurated that to work within existing economic science would need at least one of the two trillion they cut rashly from Federal Budget not removed from such.

Our recession became necessary first because people were losing their jobs not because the banks had played the accounting games to try the "can you just gamble away the risks" that President Clinton is remembered for suggesting. 

Banks would have been much better off and maybe "fine" if Bush had been allowed to attack the Clintons’ SURPLUS as "rash" and "irresponsible" administering.

No "honor" left?

We didn’t need to effect change the way the Democrats sought and did even if global warming were "real science" and a "real concern" as we had ability to create at least two new industries with additional jobs as new jobs with old jobs still intact. 

Remember the "filter" the astronauts had to fabricate in APOLLO 13 movie?  Well,  land based filter and capture devises have been invented and tested, and of near "off the Home Depot shelves" materials probably near of 80 pvc large diameter piping.

Well, tax day is near and maybe with new "lows" the norm.  Is this the first time you have considered the recession was "necessary" only towards Democrat aims in 2008 and beyond? 

Space ally?  Space ally?  But she does "what? you lost another nuclear submarine?" so well? 

Note:  above was written around the assumption that new lows in nuclear parity by such signatories today has not been done without considering our needs to defend with nuclear weapons from approaching asteroids and aliens.

NUCLEAR PARITY - A COURTING

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 7:21 am

I don’t know what happened yesterday;  I don’t know what happened as I sat down to blog on bicycling;  I don’t know what happened even after I titled my blog to be about my bicycling knowledge and taling. 

It probably was for the better.  It probably was better to revisit President Obama’s Remarks in Cairo and contrast them a near year later, and, on the anniversary of the start of America’s Civil War.  It probably was OK, since I did get out and move for 25 miles in a couple hours of cycling, civily.

Nora, I couldn’t miss it though:  You don’t think "Michelle’s" campaign is just for obese non-blacks, right?  It is neat restoring the old "road-bike" reflexes.

There is a whole new world, a whole new brave world in cycling and bike gearing, so I hear.  My circa 1982ish twelve speed road-bike, was once cutting edge on a budget;  My road-bike once had the most number of gears anyone had figured out how to put on a bicycle and with chains only able to flex so far, and slack so far.  If I hadn’t stopped riding it once I gave J.K. Rowling the challenge, and challenge with supporting by muse, to write seven books each with a progression in curriculum, I likely would have worn out this bike years ago.

I couldn’t believe my ears yesterday, and not just for comments from Nora.  I couldn’t believe what I heard and read around the welcome conclusion that Hillary Clinton is not at all in any serious consideration by President Barack Obama and First Lady Michelle Obama for consideration to our Supreme Bench;  I couldn’t believe that the "politics" of a "Hillary" consideration for "Honorable" was discussed as "she has been affirmed by this Senate once already…"

There finally seems some "reality" and maybe even "parity" in the realm of the "two Hillarys":  The "IDEA" of Hillary now seeming finally no greater than the "REALITY" of Hillary.

"Hillary the inevitable" is buried, long live "Hillary the inevitable"!  How great it is that finally "the idea of Hillary" now no greater in public eye than "the reality of Hillary Clinton."

Senator Orrin Hatch, you are mischevious, and quite political.  What political theater it could be to bring a review of Secretary Hillary Clinton back to among her old peers!  These are different times and different politics, especially in the Senate.  Where once only two Senate "peers" voted to keep her in our Senate, now the "political" hearts of more of the Senate likely would rise against her.  Voting to "pass" Senator Hillary Clinton out of Senate to State was an easy vote for any Senator with political ambitions - voting a "pass" for "Hillary" was as clever way to move her out of their way and spot lights.  Voting to move her to Supreme Court honors could make a mockery of our Senators.

Boy, oh boy, did I greatly dislike her (of the "idea of Hillary" not the "reality") IT TAKES A VILLAGE.  You see I kept compensating for her and "Bill" for years, some to much.  It would have been a disaster for me to have maintained my cycling and bike maintaining after giving J.K. Rowling such challenge to write seven books as those I wanted her to write it towards "entertaining" were neighbors I maintained bicycles for who new me as near "annal" about bikes and maintainence of such old road bike.  She just could not have "read" her subjects towards entertainment if I hadn’t abandoned my "serious cycling" and became more just a mess-about cyclist.

"Hillary" now has a record that should work against a Supreme courting and of adding not being able to spell "reset" to being the wife of a disbarred lawyer who maybe also could have been disbarred and dishonored as a willing and necessary political accomplice to yet another "lying".

Did I tell you how far bikes have come since I bought my road bike and developed my heightened reflexes for cycling and with road awareness?  Well I can still take out my old bike and have it be a performance machine and the one I remember when I so get out and move, but, when I get out of the saddle and shift to climb I do so knowing a new bike with additional gears and shifters no longer on the down tube would allow much less loss of effort and energy.  A new bike has technological "performance" advantages I will aspire to but maybe now not until I actually wear out my old set of tires. 

I know what I will be missing with greater reach to shifters and greater gaps between gears.  Harry Potter just wouldn’t have been the same "ward" hopefully not growing up to "be like a wart under the skin" if "Hogan" had channeled "anal bike mechanic" with little tolerance for error for those years though begun as of seven books could be written in just five years as so begun and focused.

Did I tell you what it did to me to live still a muse for J.K. as it went from five years to six years to seven years to eight years to nine years…?  I kept learning new things and skill instead of staying with old, and specializing, and again to avoid above concerns.

A Senate review of Secretary Hillary Clinton and old Healthcare socializing maven and now with "ruling" errors at State would be a whole new ball game, and not a "move her out, move her on" vote that helped clear the paths for other Senators with ambitions beyond Senate and now that a Senator has been proven as electable to The White House, and even with near no experience.

Well, I did get out and move again on a bicycle yesterday and returned after some "out of the saddle" hill climbing but still more as of a cautious season starting happy in progress in restoring old once lived reflexing. My road bike is still a road bike and much more serious than my serious mountain bike, my serious mountain bike though still of science and "cutting edge" of an era before "shocks" common on bikes.

4/12/2010

AND SO IT BEGAN

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 8:47 am

President Obama cannot be thought to be a socialist, can he? 

At least: President Obama cannot be said to be a serious Socialist?

To be a "socialist" President now in America would be to have such a task of governance shifting even today on the anniversary of our first day of our Civil War.  President Obama if a "serious socialist" would have little time to sleep; President Obama has time for golfing and basketball - how can he be a serious socialist?

It may be too much to hope that this American born "archetype" conceived in "cunning linguistic" relations - Soviet - of his mother and his father, can be said to be a "federalist", yet really if a serious "socialist" how can he have any "time for himself"?

I am thinking I did meet Glen Beck in New Haven back when he was just a new DJ to the area and broadcasting from a New Haven Special Olympics venue I was visiting to catch up with friends I used to have had time to help organize such events.  Some of friends’ favorite station was then KC101. Please don’t confuse my having already been, then, some, where Beck has now gone with were Beck now is. I had already writen my collection titled THE CHARGE OF NEW FEDERALISM near fully before he arrived in New Haven.

And, so on this day the Confederates fired upon Fort Sumter, so starting our American Civil War.  Why, when President Obama effected his oration to all Muslims, from Cairo, did he act a "civil war denier"?

And, so while orating his infamous "speech to all Muslims" - his "Cairo Speech" - why did President Obama put forth upon such soils such a denial of our Civil War with his declaration to so unconsecrate even our Buffalo Soldiers?  Why did President Obama declare and dedicate his "era" and his "policies" so "progressively" by enunciating that American "slaves" got out of such bondage and slavery without violence?  How does such still help at all to "negotiate" with Iran, with Holocaust denying Iran?

A denial for a denial?  Is case of Iran on Holocaust of them more Aryan as a nation, and, Obama’s "civil war" denying an attempt to lose "pride" by admitting American blacks in slavery needed white Americans to fight and die for them and their achieving freedom?

If not "socialist" is he just "progressive" and of "process theology"?  Is he of another Jonathan Edwards?  If not a "socialist" is he more theologic or philosophic?

On this anniversary of the start of our Civil War, Mr. President, can you now finally explain why you attempted "American slaves got out of such bondage peacefully and without violence" and in a speech to "All Muslims" and of an era of Irani leadership of being a nation of many Aryans and with leaders "Holocaust deniers"?

"The last point is important because there are some who advocate for democracy only when they’re out of power; once in power, they are ruthless in suppressing the rights of others. (Applause.) So no matter where it takes hold, government of the people and by the people sets a single standard fro all who would hold power: You must maintain your power through consent, not coercion; you must respect the rights of minorities, and participate with a spirit of tolerance and compromise; you must place the interests of your poeple and the legitimate workings of the political process above your party.  Without these ingredients, elections alone do not make true democracy." {Remarks by the President at Cairo University, 6-04-09| The White House, www.whitehouse.gov}

 

4/11/2010

TOO MANY AMY

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 1:36 pm

Phil, good luck!  Best wishes to your Amy not an unrelated Amy of IBM once thought buried in my past, for her then not quite past.

Yes, it is hard to think of golf on TV without IBM, yet, still your Amy is not the old IBM Amy of before Gerstner days, and likely now still tied the old way through clubs, in golf clubs, and dinner clubs.

Poor Tiger Woods now being given enough southern rope to hang himself in golf.  Poor Tiger Woods now being let to run his rope out and return himself to counseling…?

These are not the same old days of south!  These are not even near the same old Chicago days of Jack Johnson as this is golf.  This is a new day of level playing fields and greens still uneven.

Is it his wins that made so many enemies or his losses?

Phil?  Your Amy is not another’s Amy, fight on.

Is it Tiger’s wins that drove him to such to now maybe only attract K-Y ads and Trojan ads?

What is the corporate think but now the old "southern rope" of though now "enough to hang yourself"?

Is this the future of golf now on trial?

It is sort of like wondering how many times do I have to bring defeat to Hillary Clinton as to now still try to help Phil Mickelson and his Amy.  See: my heroes were of James E. Burke and even much of his taking down Frank Metz of IBM and so I thought of taking down and away the "Amy" of such era thought "left behind" for good.  To use one on another Metz and playfully with "ego" for "zero tolerance" dominance should have been clear enough that putting such in play by a daughter (playfully) of one to the defeat of her father was only to be interpreted as nulifying any future relationship with such an "Amy" on any grounds anywhere close to being based upon trust.

To leave without a win, while to keep your standards and ambitions in place before any real guilt could/should be established and in a different era but still an era of consequence in current politics national…?

Well, Ogilvy, I grew up wanting to be of a familiar legend like another Ogilvy and did fit quite so into such’s familiar’s shoes of old Church’s wingtips even when Phil, fell back in Mamaroneck, and so even years earlier at Tuxedo Club visit of considering another Amy not Phil’s.

It really is hard to believe President Obama is a SOCIALIST as to be such should require so much work in transforming our governance that he shouldn’t have any available time for golf or for basketball. Well, maybe I should get to just golf.

Is it a "level playing field" to play as Tiger Woods with so many known "belles" as like playing on steroids but without?  Is this the secret of "Bill’s" success or the secret of "Hillary’s" success? 

Surely women, it can only be one way and not both ways, right?

Well, for Tiger’s sake I do reflect that he grew up since first "golf spot" and such "national exposure" having more "girl friends" over fifty and maybe even over sixty five than any golfer ever.

Tiger, can you help the sport by helping Amys?  Can you help the sport by not spoiling marriages of choice and not of near forced compliance? 

Surely it is best for "Hillary" to remain silent and maybe take a fifth…?

SAVED BY THE BELLE?

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 7:49 am

WE ARE ALL APPROACHING AN ANNIVERSARY, TOGETHER, AS AMERICANS. LAST YEAR ON THIS NEARING DAY OF SUCH TELLING ANEW WE SMARTED TO REVENUES BEING DOWN NEAR 40% ACROSS OUR COUNTRY. THE WORLD MAY BE WATCHING MORE THAN WE THINK, STILL.

WHAT IS IN A NAME? 

WHAT IS IN THE TYPE?

WHAT IS IN THE SET - HOW DEEP IS IT SET?

(I AM OLD ENOUGH TO HAVE ACTUALLY OWNED AND USED A "SMITH CORONA" TYPEWRITER AND KNOW THE "SAVED BY THE BELL" THIS PIECE IS NOT ABOUT. I AM THOUGH HARDLY OLD ENOUGH WHILE FOUR YEARS TO DAY YOUNGER THAN PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA.)

SO, IF YOU HAD IT TO DO ALL OVER AGAIN…?

WOULD YOUR FAVOR BE FOR A "TYPIST" OF ANOTHER GENDER? WOULD YOUR "SET" BE JUST A "CARBON COPY" - YET A "BELLE"?  IS THEIR "STOKE" AND "JUSTIFICATION" BUT THE SAME?

ARE YOU NOW ASKING: BUT "PRESIDENT HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON" WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER?

WELL TAX DAY IS COMING, TAX DAY IS COMING, TAX DAY IS COMING AGAIN AND AGAIN LIKELY WITH "REVENUES" DOWN. THEIR SET IS THE SAME - ONLY THEIR NAMES ARE DIFFERENT?

DID FIRST LADY HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON EVER, AS FIRST LADY OF ARKANSAS, EVER REALLY LOOSE HER "CHICAGO STREET" AND BECOME A "SOUTHERN BELLE"? DID FIRST LADY HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON DO ANYTHING BUT PROMISE AS RADICAL CHICAGO STYLE SOCIALIST ONSET OF NEW GOVERNANCE?  DID SENATOR HILLARY CLINTON SMART WHEN ONLY TWO OF HER SENATE PEERS VOTED TO KEEP HER IN THE SENATE?

ARE WE SAFER NOW THAT IT IS SECRETARY HILLARY CLINTON?  ARE WE SAFER WITH SUCH OF RECENT PAST OF ‘WE WILL SIEZE OIL COMPANY PROFITS’ AND WITH MAYBE RELATED ‘WE WILL "OBLITERATE" IRAN’?

ARE WE IN AN "FOUR MORE YEARS OF CLINTON" ANYWAYS?

AREN’T WE JUST IN A "FOUR MORE YEARS OF CLINTON" AS EVIDENCED BY THOSE SURROUNDING "PRESIDENT BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA"?

WELL WE ARE APPROACHING APRIL 15TH "TAX DAY" AND LIKELY WITH REVENUES WHERE THEY WOULD BE IF SENATOR HILLARY RODHAM CLINTON HAD BEEN ELECTED IN DEMOCRAT PRIMARY AND OUR GENERAL ELECTION OF 2008. 

DID SHE EVER REALLY BECOME A "SOUTHERN BELLE"?

DID SHE EVER LOOSE HER ILLINOIS "STREET" OF TALES TOLD OF HAVING BEEN RAISED TO HIT THE NEIGHBORHOOD BOYS FIRST?  

THIS IS NOT NOW THE DAYS WE CAN SAY WE WOULD HAVE BEEN SAVED BY THE "BELLE" - THIS IS NOW THE ONSET OF "HILLARY DEMS" ESPECIALLY AROUND THE "OBAMA" ECONOMICS.

TODAY THOUGH IS THE LAST DAY OF PLAY (?) AT AUGUSTA MASTERS:  SECRETARY HILLARY CLINTON:  HAVE YOU EXPRESSED YOUR THOUGHTS AND FEELINGS AROUND TIGER WOODS PLAY YET? 

WOULD WOOD WIN WIND WOODS WITHIN WALLS WITH "WOMEN" WON WITH WOOD’S WOODS WHILE WONDERING WITH WIN WON WITH "WOMEN" WON WHILE WITH "WOMAN" "WIFE" WONDERING WON "WITH" "WOMEN" WONDEROUS WHITHER WILEY WITH WHETHER WITH WITH WON "WITHIN WALLS WOOD" WON?

SECRETARY HILLARY?  

 

4/10/2010

myblog format test

Filed under: — @jphoganorg @ 9:43 am

It is near April 15th first anniversary of my blog writing and posting on jphogan.org.  I have had over 93,000 visits in past year with near 227 columns so available to an international audience with domains showing visits from near 19 different countries.  www.jphogan.org is such blog location and this http://myblog.jphogan.org another option I may adapt.